Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2

Open access
Williamson, Brandi N., Feldmann, Friederike, Schwarz, Benjamin, Meade-White, Kimberly, Porter, Danielle P., Schulz, Jonathan, van Doremalen, Neeltje, Leighton, Ian, Yinda, Claude Kwe, Pérez-Pérez, Lizzette, Okumura, Atsushi, Lovaglio, Jamie, Hanley, Patrick W., Saturday, Greg, Bosio, Catharine M., Anzick, Sarah, Barbian, Kent, Cihlar, Tomas, Martens, Craig, Scott, Dana P., Munster, Vincent J., de Wit, Emmie·2020·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Effective therapies to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed. While many investigational, approved, and repurposed drugs have been suggested as potential treatments, preclinical data from animal models can guide the search for effective treatments by ruling out those that lack efficacy in vivo. Remdesivir (GS-5734) is a nucleotide analogue prodrug with broad antiviral activity1,2 that is currently being investigated in COVID-19 clinical trials and recently received Emergency Use Authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration3,4. In animal models, remdesivir was effective against infection with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)2,5,6. In vitro, remdesivir inhibited replication of SARS-CoV-27,8. Here we investigate the efficacy of remdesivir in a rhesus macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection9. Unlike vehicle-treated animals, macaques treated with remdesivir did not show signs of respiratory disease; they also showed reduced pulmonary infiltrates on radiographs and reduced virus titres in bronchoalveolar lavages twelve hours after the first dose. Virus shedding from the upper respiratory tract was not reduced by remdesivir treatment. At necropsy, remdesivir-treated animals had lower lung viral loads and reduced lung damage. Thus, treatment with remdesivir initiated early during infection had a clinical benefit in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. Although the rhesus macaque model does not represent the severe disease observed in some patients with COVID-19, our data support the early initiation of remdesivir treatment in patients with COVID-19 to prevent progression to pneumonia. The nucleotide analogue prodrug remdesivir reduces viral load and lung disease in a rhesus macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2423-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
Williamson, B. N., Feldmann, F., Schwarz, B., Meade-White, K., Porter, D. P., Schulz, J., van Doremalen, N., Leighton, I., Yinda, C. K., Pérez-Pérez, L., Okumura, A., Lovaglio, J., Hanley, P. W., Saturday, G., Bosio, C. M., Anzick, S., Barbian, K., Cihlar, T., Martens, C., Scott, D. P., Munster, V. J., & de Wit, E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
585
Issue
7824
Pages
273-276
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3032915827
Cited by
689
References
19
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-020-2423-5
The paper
Williamson, B. N., Feldmann, F., Schwarz, B., Meade-White, K., Porter, D. P., Schulz, J., van Doremalen, N., Leighton, I., Yinda, C. K., Pérez-Pérez, L., Okumura, A., Lovaglio, J., Hanley, P. W., Saturday, G., Bosio, C. M., Anzick, S., Barbian, K., Cihlar, T., Martens, C., . . . de Wit, E. (2020). Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2423-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.