Cited by 445Mitochondrial Function and PathologyAutophagy in Disease and TherapyCell death mechanisms and regulation

Function and regulation of the divisome for mitochondrial fission

Kraus, Felix, Roy, Krishnendu, Pucadyil, Thomas J., Ryan, Michael T.·2021·Nature

Abstract

Mitochondria form dynamic networks in the cell that are balanced by the flux of iterative fusion and fission events of the organelles. It is now appreciated that mitochondrial fission also represents an end-point event in a signalling axis that allows cells to sense and respond to external cues. The fission process is orchestrated by membrane-associated adaptors, influenced by organellar and cytoskeletal interactions and ultimately executed by the dynamin-like GTPase DRP1. Here we invoke the framework of the 'mitochondrial divisome', which is conceptually and operationally similar to the bacterial cell-division machinery. We review the functional and regulatory aspects of the mitochondrial divisome and, within this framework, parse the core from the accessory machinery. In so doing, we transition from a phenomenological to a mechanistic understanding of the fission process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-03214-x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fragmentation of mitochondrial network facilitates mitophagy, allowing selective clearance of defective mitochondria and preventing excessive ROS production and Ca2+ dyshomeostasis.

    “Fragmentation of the mitochondrial network facilitates mitophagy, allowing the selective clearance of defective mitochondria [77] and consequently preventing excessive ROS production and Ca2+ dyshomeostasis.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraus, F., Roy, K., Pucadyil, T. J., & Ryan, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IN)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Pucadyil, Thomas J.
  • Ryan, Michael T.
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-02-03
Volume
590
Issue
7844
Pages
57-66
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3129190575
Cited by
445
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 26
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
mitochondrial fission, Drp1, mitochondrial fusion, mitochondrial dynamics, cytoskeletal interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease, Biological Evolution, Health, Humans, Mitochondria, Cell Death, Calcium Signaling, Dynamins, Mitochondrial Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review