Virus-induced senescence is a driver and therapeutic target in COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
Derailed cytokine and immune cell networks account for the organ damage and the clinical severity of COVID-19 (refs. 1-4). Here we show that SARS-CoV-2, like other viruses, evokes cellular senescence as a primary stress response in infected cells. Virus-induced senescence (VIS) is indistinguishable from other forms of cellular senescence and is accompanied by a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which comprises pro-inflammatory cytokines, extracellular-matrix-active factors and pro-coagulatory mediators 5-7. Patients with COVID-19 displayed markers of senescence in their airway mucosa in situ and increased serum levels of SASP factors. In vitro assays demonstrated macrophage activation with SASP-reminiscent secretion, complement lysis and SASP-amplifying secondary senescence of endothelial cells, which mirrored hallmark features of COVID-19 such as macrophage and neutrophil infiltration, endothelial damage and widespread thrombosis in affected lung tissue 1,8,9. Moreover, supernatant from VIS cells, including SARS-CoV-2-induced senescence, induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation and activation of platelets and the clotting cascade. Senolytics such as navitoclax and a combination of dasatinib plus quercetin selectively eliminated VIS cells, mitigated COVID-19-reminiscent lung disease and reduced inflammation in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters and mice. Our findings mark VIS as a pathogenic trigger of COVID-19-related cytokine escalation and organ damage, and suggest that senolytic targeting of virus-infected cells is a treatment option against SARS-CoV-2 and perhaps other viral infections.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Senescent cell fate can be triggered by many stressors, including DNA damage, oncogene activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolites, oxygen extremes, proteotoxic stress, extracellular signals, infections, mechanical or shear stress, resistance exercise, and factors secreted by other senescent cells.
“The senescent cell fate can be triggered by a number of stressors including DNA damage, cancerous mutations or oncogene activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolites, hyperoxia or hypoxia, proteotoxic stress, extracellular signals, infections, mechanical or shear stresses that deform cells, resistance exercise and factors secreted by other senescent cells18,38–47.”
From Cellular senescence and senolytics: the path to the clinic (2022) · cites this paper as [45]
The Article section says that viral entry can trigger senescence and identifies activated oncogenes and DNA-damaging cancer therapy as other triggers. The Properties of VIS section also reports paracrine senescence induction. The paper does not support the full list attributed to it, including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxygen extremes, mechanical or shear stress, and resistance exercise (no page numbers provided). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSenescent cells accumulate with aging and skeletal injury in the bone microenvironment.
“There is considerable evidence that senescent cells accumulate with aging and skeletal injury in the bone microenvironment25,73–76.”
From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
The Article section says cellular senescence occurs in ageing and wound healing. It does not say that senescent cells accumulate after skeletal injury or locate that accumulation in the bone microenvironment; searches for skeletal injury, bone, and fracture found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTransgenic mice with cell type-specific elimination of senescent cells were recently developed, p16-LOX-ATTAC mice.
“To address this limitation, transgenic mice with cell type-specific elimination of senescent cells were recently developed, p16-LOX-ATTAC mice75.”
From Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
The “Senolytic targeting of COVID-19 in vivo” section describes K18-hACE2-transgenic mice treated with senolytic drugs, not p16-LOX-ATTAC mice. Searches for “p16-LOX-ATTAC,” “ATTAC,” and cell type-specific genetic elimination found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed mouse model. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSARS-CoV-2 worsens the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP).
“SARS-CoV-2, like other viruses, can induce senescence and exacerbates the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Virus-induced senescence appears to be a universal stress response in host cells and can be triggered by many virus species.
“VIS appears to be a universal stress response in host cells and can be induced by many different virus species.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
SARS-CoV-2 is able to induce cellular senescence.
“Recently, it was found that SARS-CoV-2 can evoke a form of cellular senescence, virus-induced senescence (VIS) (Box 1), through multiple mechanisms27–29”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Cells lacking functional p53 or overexpressing JMJD2c fail to enter VIS and lack a SASP after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“in vitro experiments showed that cells that lack functional p53 or overexpress the H3K9me3 demethylase JMJD2c46,50 — which therefore cannot enter senescence in response to pro-senescent oncogenes such as Ras-G12V or Braf-V600E46,51 — also failed to enter VIS and lacked a SASP upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 (ref.28).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Lung specimens from COVID-19 patients show much stronger signs of senescence than SARS-CoV-2 negative controls.
“Similar analyses of lung specimens from patients with COVID-19, consistent with multiple independent patient datasets29,44,52, also showed much stronger signs of senescence compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative controls28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
A panel of senescence markers distinguishes nasopharyngeal mucosa from COVID-19 patients versus pre-pandemic controls, with higher reactivity in COVID-19 samples.
“when comparing samples of nasopharyngeal mucosa from patients with COVID-19 to pre-pandemic biopsy samples from individuals without a manifest respiratory tract infection, a panel of senescence markers was shown to robustly discriminate these two groups, with significantly higher reactivity in samples from patients with COVID-19 (refs.28,29,44,52).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA is detectable in many but not all VIS-positive samples, suggesting that VIS can persist after the initial infection.
“SARS-CoV-2 mRNA was detectable by in situ hybridization in many but not all VIS-positive samples, suggesting that VIS may persist beyond the initial infection28,61,62”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Senescence markers p16INK4a, p21CIP1, H3K9me3, lipofuscin, and IL-8 are markedly elevated in upper respiratory mucosa from COVID-19 patients.
“senescence markers, such as p16INK4a, p21CIP1, H3K9me3 and lipofuscin (detected by the GL13-SenTraGorTM reagent in fixed tissues60), as well as IL-8 (a component of the SASP) were markedly elevated in samples from the upper respiratory mucosa from patients with COVID-19 (ref.28)”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
In vitro and in vivo experiments show that macrophages near SASP-producing virus-infected epithelial cells can undergo paracrine secondary senescence or acquire a senescence-like condition.
“in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown that resident and non-resident macrophages in the vicinity of SASP-producing virus-infected epithelial cells can undergo paracrine secondary senescence or acquire a senescence-like condition28,63,66,77,78.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Senescent cells acutely reinforce systemic inflammatory responses to pathogens and facilitate the spread of senescence, as described by the SASP amplifier/rheostat model.
“We suspect that senescent cells acutely reinforce systemic inflammatory responses to pathogens and facilitate the spread of senescence, a hypothesis termed the ‘SASP amplifier/rheostat model’27,28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
WHO-graded clinical severity of COVID-19 correlates positively with increasing levels of IL-6, SERPINA3, and D-Dimer-based clotting activity.
“WHO-graded clinical severity of COVID-19 correlated positively with increasing concentrations of the pro-inflammatory SASP cytokine IL-6, the coagulation-related SASP representative SERPINA3 and D-Dimer-based clotting activity28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
SASP-typical cytokines, extracellular matrix-active proteases, and SASP-related pro-coagulant and complement-activating factors are strongly elevated in the serum of COVID-19 patients compared with healthy controls.
“were also strongly elevated in the serum of patients with COVID-19 compared to healthy controls28,52,67–70.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Lungs from patients with severe COVID-19 show much higher infiltration by CD86+ macrophages and stronger SASP-reminiscent cytokine expression than controls.
“lungs from patients with severe COVID-19 exhibited much higher levels of infiltration by CD86+ macrophages and much stronger SASP-reminiscent cytokine expression compared to lungs from patients who died without notable signs of a respiratory infection and who were not infected with SARS-CoV-2 (refs.28,61).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
These effects were detected to a much lesser extent when supernatant from virus-infected but senescence-resistant cells was tested.
“These effects represent highly disease-relevant components of COVID-19-related immunothrombosis, which were detected to a much lesser extent if the supernatant from virus-infected but senescence-resistant cells was tested28 (Fig. 2).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Conditioned medium from senescent cells rich in SASP-associated factors evoked paracrine senescence in endothelial cells or triggered complement-mediated cytolysis, promoted NET formation by neutrophils, activated platelets, and accelerated clotting.
“Specifically, conditioned medium from senescent cells that is rich in SASP-associated factors evoked paracrine senescence in endothelial cells or triggered their complement-mediated cytolysis, promoted NET formation by neutrophils, activated platelets, and accelerated clotting.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
In vitro observations suggest an essential, secretome-dependent role of VIS and senescence in general in the pathobiological manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
“Overall, these in vitro observations suggest an essential, secretome-dependent role of VIS and senescence in general in the pathobiological manifestation of the infection27–29.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Culture supernatant from equally virus-infected but senescence-incapable cells did not evoke those macrophage effects.
“By contrast, the culture supernatant of equally virus-infected but senescence-incapable cells failed to evoke these cellular effects28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
In animal models of fatal COVID-19, senolytic regimens based on flavonoids, such as the dasatinib and quercetin combination or fisetin, enhanced survival rates.
“In animal models of fatal COVID-19, senolytic regimens based on flavonoids, such as the dasatinib and quercetin combination or fisetin, enhanced survival rates28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Navitoclax, fisetin, and a combination of dasatinib and quercetin demonstrated significant cytotoxic activity against VIS cells in vitro, leaving uninfected or virus-infected but genetically senescence-incapable cells virtually unaffected.
“Navitoclax, fisetin, and a combination of dasatinib and quercetin demonstrated significant cytotoxic activity against VIS cells (including human nasal epithelial cells exposed to SARS-CoV-2) in vitro, leaving uninfected or virus-infected but genetically senescence-incapable cells virtually unaffected28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Navitoclax, fisetin, or a combination of dasatinib and quercetin quantitatively eliminated senescent cells in situ and improved at least some central histopathological findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung in all mentioned animal models.
“Navitoclax, fisetin, or a combination of dasatinib and quercetin were found to quantitatively eliminate senescent cells in situ and to improve at least some of the central histopathological findings of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lung in all the animal models mentioned28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Beta variants elicited a significantly stronger pro-inflammatory SASP upon infection compared to the ancestral strain, and these VIS cells exhibited excellent susceptibility to the aforementioned senolytics in vitro, comparable to cells infected with the ancestral virus.
“Importantly, the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha and Beta variants elicited a significantly stronger pro-inflammatory SASP upon infection compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain, and these VIS cells exhibited excellent susceptibility to the aforementioned senolytics in vitro, comparable to cells infected with the ancestral virus28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Targeting the cGAS-STING axis with the small-molecule STING inhibitor H-151 had a SASP-suppressing, senomorphic effect and led to reduced lung pathology and prolonged survival in a human ACE2-transgenic mouse model of COVID-19.
“Targeting of the cGAS–STING axis, which induces type I interferons and other SASP factors, with the small-molecule STING inhibitor H-151 had a SASP-suppressing, senomorphic effect28,121,128,129 and led to reduced lung pathology and prolonged survival in a human ACE2-transgenic mouse model of COVID-19 (ref.59).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Broadly elevated levels of SASP-typical cytokines and interleukins, including G-CSF, IFNγ, IL-1α, IL-7, IL-17A, TNF and VEGF, in serum of infected animals were reduced by all agents tested to levels virtually indistinguishable from uninfected animals.
“Strikingly, the broadly elevated levels of SASP-typical cytokines and interleukins — among them granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IFNγ, IL-1α, IL-7, IL-17A, TNF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) — that were detected (despite the challenge to do this at the protein level in hamsters) in the serum of infected animals, were reduced by all agents tested to levels that were”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Expression of BCL-xL and BCL-w and activity of SRC, AKT and p38 kinases were elevated in retrovirus-infected fibroblast models of VIS, in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters, and in patients with COVID-19.
“Indeed, the expression of BCL-xL and BCL-w and the activity of SRC, AKT and p38 kinases were found to be elevated in retrovirus-infected fibroblast models of VIS, in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters and in patients with COVID-19 (ref.28).”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
In the Roborovski dwarf hamster model, treatment with dasatinib and quercetin resulted in significantly attenuated disease features regarding overall pneumonia score, bronchial epithelial hyperplasia, and alveolar damage.
“Particularly pronounced effects were observed in the Roborovski dwarf hamster model, where treatment with a combination of dasatinib and quercetin resulted in significantly attenuated disease features with respect to the overall pneumonia score, bronchial epithelial hyperplasia and alveolar damage28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
A collective analysis of both trials demonstrated a significantly better outcome in terms of avoiding hospitalization, need for oxygen, referral to the intensive care unit and death.
“Specifically, a collective analysis of both trials demonstrated a significantly better outcome in terms of avoiding hospitalization, need for oxygen, referral to the intensive care unit and death28.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Rapidly expanding evidence implicates cellular senescence as a host cell response to viral infection in general and to SARS-CoV-2 in particular.
“Rapidly expanding evidence implicates cellular senescence as a host cell response to viral infection in general and to SARS-CoV-2 in particular, similar to other cellular insults such as telomere dysfunction, oncogene activation or chemotherapy27–29.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
A large variety of viruses have been shown to induce senescence in vitro and in vivo, whereas no VIS phenotype was observed upon infection with the mild seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus in Syrian hamsters.
“A large variety of viruses have been shown to induce senescence in vitro and in vivo27,28,38, whereas no VIS phenotype was observed upon infection with the mild seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus in Syrian hamsters62, implying that not all virus infections might be susceptible to senolytic strategies.”
From COVID-19 and cellular senescence (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Senolytic treatment in animal models of COVID-19 eliminates virus-induced senescent cells and reduces inflammation and mortality, suggesting senescent cells are a potential therapeutic target in viral infections.
“Notably, senolytic treatment in animal models of COVID-19 eliminates virus-induced senescent cells and reduces inflammation and mortality, suggesting that senescent cells are a potential therapeutic target in viral infections (Camell et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 350
- Authors
- Lee, S., Yu, Y., Trimpert, J., Benthani, F., Mairhofer, M., Richter-Pechanska, P., Wyler, E., Belenki, D., Kaltenbrunner, S., Pammer, M., Kausche, L., Firsching, T. C., Dietert, K., Schotsaert, M., Martínez-Romero, C., Singh, G., Kunz, S., Niemeyer, D., Ghanem, R., Salzer, H. J. F., Paar, C., Mülleder, M., Uccellini, M., Michaelis, E. G., Khan, A., Lau, A., Schönlein, M., Habringer, A., Tomasits, J., Adler, J. M., Kimeswenger, S., Gruber, A. D., Hoetzenecker, W., Steinkellner, H., Purfürst, B., Motz, R., Di Pierro, F., Lamprecht, B., Osterrieder, N., Landthaler, M., Drosten, C., García-Sastre, A., Langer, R., Ralser, M., Eils, R., Reimann, M., Fan, D. N. Y., & Schmitt, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Kepler Universitätsklinikum (AT)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- German Center for Infection Research (DE)
- Stiftung Charité (DE)
- Regeneron (United States) (US)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- BOKU University (AT)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schmitt, Clemens A.
- ORCID
- Lee, Soyoung
- Yu, Yong
- Trimpert, Jakob
- Benthani, Fahad
- Mairhofer, Mario
- Wyler, Emanuel
- Belenki, Dimitri
- Kaltenbrunner, Sabine
- Kausche, Lea
- Firsching, Theresa C.
- Dietert, Kristina
- Schotsaert, Michael
- Martínez-Romero, Carles
- Singh, Gagandeep
- Kunz, Séverine
- Niemeyer, Daniela
- Salzer, Helmut J. F.
- Mülleder, Michael
- Uccellini, Melissa
- Michaelis, Edward G.
- Khan, Amjad
- Schönlein, Martin
- Adler, Julia M.
- Kimeswenger, Susanne
- Gruber, Achim D.
- Hoetzenecker, Wolfram
- Steinkellner, Herta
- Purfürst, Bettina
- Lamprecht, Bernd
- Osterrieder, Nikolaus
- Landthaler, Markus
- Drosten, Christian
- García-Sastre, Adolfo
- Langer, Rupert
- Ralser, Markus
- Eils, Roland
- Reimann, Maurice
- Schmitt, Clemens A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2021-09-13
- Volume
- 599
- Issue
- 7884
- Pages
- 283-289
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W3200781500
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 37.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2025-02-04)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- JPB Foundation (2020-215611, HHSN272201400008C, 2020-215611 [5384))
- Wellcome Trust (FC001134)
- Francis Crick Institute (10134, FC001134)
- Open Philanthropy Project (#2020-215611, HHSN272201400008C)
- Cancer Research UK (FC001134)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHM 1633/11-1, SFB-TR84 Z01b, GO 2688/1 1, SFB‐TR84, SCHM 1633/9-1)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0189A)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
- Deutsche Krebshilfe (7011377629)
- Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011, W81XWH-20-1-0270, HR0011-19-2-0020, U19AI135972, U19AI142733)
- Medical Research Council (FC001134, COVID-19)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272201400008C), #75N93021C00014, COVID-19, W81XWH-20-1-0270, 2020-215611 (5384, U19AI142733, U19AI135972, 2020-215611, U19AI142733, U19AI135972)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, cellular senescence, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, senolytics, navitoclax, macrophage activation, neutrophil extracellular traps, thrombosis, endothelial cell senescence, cytokine storm, lung injury, respiratory mucosa, complement-mediated lysis, viral pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Dasatinib, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Aniline Compounds, Animals, Cell Line, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Cricetinae, Humans, Male, Quercetin, Sulfonamides, Thrombosis, Cellular Senescence, Mice, Molecular Targeted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review