Cited by 165Heat shock proteins researchProtein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 42 of the 71 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Structure of Hsp90–p23–GR reveals the Hsp90 client-remodelling mechanism

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Hsp90 is a conserved and essential molecular chaperone responsible for the folding and activation of hundreds of 'client' proteins 1-3. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a model client that constantly depends on Hsp90 for activity 4-9. GR ligand binding was previously shown to nr inhibited by Hsp70 and restored by Hsp90, aided by the co-chaperone p23 10. However, a molecular understanding of the chaperone-mediated remodelling that occurs between the inactive Hsp70-Hsp90 'client-loading complex' and an activated Hsp90-p23 'client-maturation complex' is lacking for any client, including GR. Here we present a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the human GR-maturation complex (GR-Hsp90-p23), revealing that the GR ligand-binding domain is restored to a folded, ligand-bound conformation, while being simultaneously threaded through the Hsp90 lumen. In addition, p23 directly stabilizes native GR using a C-terminal helix, resulting in enhanced ligand binding. This structure of a client bound to Hsp90 in a native conformation contrasts sharply with the unfolded kinase-Hsp90 structure 11. Thus, aided by direct co-chaperone-client interactions, Hsp90 can directly dictate client-specific folding outcomes. Together with the GR-loading complex structure 12, we present the molecular mechanism of chaperone-mediated GR remodelling, establishing the first, to our knowledge, complete chaperone cycle for any Hsp90 client.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-021-04236-1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

54 Own result · 21 Own interpretation · 15 Supported · 9 Partly supported · 9 No full text of the sources · 7 Supported so far · 3 Own method · 1 Not supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Sources not found · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 50
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
73 of 73
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this work, the molecular basis of the transition between the client-loading and client-maturation complexes was lacking for GR and for all clients.

    “However, a molecular understanding of the chaperone-mediated remodeling that occurs between the inactive Hsp70:Hsp90 ‘client-loading complex’ and an activated Hsp90:p23 ‘client-maturation complex’ is lacking for GR, or any client.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The in vitro reconstituted GR:Hsp90:p23 complex represents the physiological GR maturation complex.

    “The GR-maturation complex was prepared through in vitro reconstitution of the GR chaperone cycle”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The MBP-GR ligand-binding domain construct behaves equivalently to full-length GR in the chaperone cycle.

    “MBP (maltose-binding protein)-GR ligand-binding domain (LBD) was incubated with Hsp70, Hsp40, Hop, Hsp90, and p23”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Noddings, C. M., Wang, R. Y.-R., Johnson, J. L., & Agard, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Agard, David A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2021-12-22
Volume
601
Issue
7893
Pages
465-469
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4200236070
Cited by
164
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 10
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • Life Sciences Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od021741-01, 1s10od020054-01)
  • University of California, San Francisco (R35GM118099)
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA265084)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118099, P20GM104420, R01GM127675)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
HSP90, p23, glucocorticoid receptor, molecular chaperones, co-chaperones, ligand-binding domain, chaperone cycle
MeSH terms
Prostaglandin-E Synthases, Humans, Ligands, Protein Binding, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Molecular Chaperones, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, HSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins, Cryoelectron Microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review