Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies

Open access
Kennedy, Katherine M., de Goffau, Marcus C., Perez-Muñoz, Maria Elisa, Arrieta, Marie-Claire, Bäckhed, Fredrik, Bork, Peer, Braun, Thorsten, Bushman, Frederic D., Dore, Joel, de Vos, Willem M., Earl, Ashlee M., Eisen, Jonathan A., Elovitz, Michal A., Ganal-Vonarburg, Stephanie C., Gänzle, Michael G., Garrett, Wendy S., Hall, Lindsay J., Hornef, Mathias W., Huttenhower, Curtis, Konnikova, Liza, Lebeer, Sarah, Macpherson, Andrew J., Massey, Ruth C., McHardy, Alice Carolyn, Koren, Omry, Lawley, Trevor D., Ley, Ruth E., O’Mahony, Liam, O’Toole, Paul W., Pamer, Eric G., Parkhill, Julian, Raes, Jeroen, Rattei, Thomas, Salonen, Anne, Segal, Eran, Segata, Nicola, Shanahan, Fergus, Sloboda, Deborah M., Smith, Gordon C. S., Sokol, Harry, Spector, Tim D., Surette, Michael G., Tannock, Gerald W., Walker, Alan W., Yassour, Moran, Walter, Jens·2023·Nature

Abstract

Whether the human fetus and the prenatal intrauterine environment (amniotic fluid and placenta) are stably colonized by microbial communities in a healthy pregnancy remains a subject of debate. Here we evaluate recent studies that characterized microbial populations in human fetuses from the perspectives of reproductive biology, microbial ecology, bioinformatics, immunology, clinical microbiology and gnotobiology, and assess possible mechanisms by which the fetus might interact with microorganisms. Our analysis indicates that the detected microbial signals are likely the result of contamination during the clinical procedures to obtain fetal samples or during DNA extraction and DNA sequencing. Furthermore, the existence of live and replicating microbial populations in healthy fetal tissues is not compatible with fundamental concepts of immunology, clinical microbiology and the derivation of germ-free mammals. These conclusions are important to our understanding of human immune development and illustrate common pitfalls in the microbial analyses of many other low-biomass environments. The pursuit of a fetal microbiome serves as a cautionary example of the challenges of sequence-based microbiome studies when biomass is low or absent, and emphasizes the need for a trans-disciplinary approach that goes beyond contamination controls by also incorporating biological, ecological and mechanistic concepts. This Perspective reviews the evidence for and against the existence of a fetal microbiome and concludes that detected microbial signals are most likely the result of contamination, suggesting that the ‘sterile womb’ hypothesis is correct.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-022-05546-8

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 134 references

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Kennedy, K. M., de Goffau, M. C., Perez-Muñoz, M. E., Arrieta, M.-C., Bäckhed, F., Bork, P., Braun, T., Bushman, F. D., Dore, J., de Vos, W. M., Earl, A. M., Eisen, J. A., Elovitz, M. A., Ganal-Vonarburg, S. C., Gänzle, M. G., Garrett, W. S., Hall, L. J., Hornef, M. W., Huttenhower, C., Konnikova, L., Lebeer, S., Macpherson, A. J., Massey, R. C., McHardy, A. C., Koren, O., Lawley, T. D., Ley, R. E., O’Mahony, L., O’Toole, P. W., Pamer, E. G., Parkhill, J., Raes, J., Rattei, T., Salonen, A., Segal, E., Segata, N., Shanahan, F., Sloboda, D. M., Smith, G. C. S., Sokol, H., Spector, T. D., Surette, M. G., Tannock, G. W., Walker, A. W., Yassour, M., & Walter, J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-01-25
Volume
613
Issue
7945
Pages
639-649
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4317951846
Cited by
371
References
134
FWCI
28.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-022-05546-8
The paper
Kennedy, K. M., de Goffau, M. C., Perez-Muñoz, M. E., Arrieta, M.-C., Bäckhed, F., Bork, P., Braun, T., Bushman, F. D., Dore, J., de Vos, W. M., Earl, A. M., Eisen, J. A., Elovitz, M. A., Ganal-Vonarburg, S. C., Gänzle, M. G., Garrett, W. S., Hall, L. J., Hornef, M. W., Huttenhower, C., . . . Walter, J. (2023). Questioning the fetal microbiome illustrates pitfalls of low-biomass microbial studies. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05546-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.