Cited by 17Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Reorganization of the theropod wrist preceded the origin of avian flight

Napoli, James G., Fabbri, Matteo, Ruebenstahl, Alexander A., O’Connor, Jingmai K., Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S., Norell, Mark A.·2025·Nature

Abstract

The carpus (wrist) of birds has a complex evolutionary history, long known to involve carpal reduction and recently shown to include topological replacement of one carpal (the ulnare) by another (the pisiform)1. The pisiform plays a crucial role in stabilization of the distal wingtip during flight 2, and facilitates kinematic integration that 'automates' wing motion 3. The apparent absence of a pisiform in all but the earliest theropod dinosaurs led to the proposal that it was lost early in theropod evolution and regained only in birds as a key step in the origin of flight 1. Here, we describe the forelimb skeletons of two newly prepared theropod dinosaur specimens from the Gobi Desert of Mongolia, each of which preserves a pisiform, establishing its presence in Oviraptorosauria and Troodontidae in addition to birds. Reinterpretation of published material in light of these specimens shows a pisiform in a wide range of theropod species, including Microraptor 4, Ambopteryx 5 and Anchiornis 6. Our results indicate that the pisiform replaced the ulnare by origin of the clade Pennaraptora, phylogenetically coincident with the hypothesized origin(s) of flight in birds and their closest relatives 7,8. Taken together, our results indicate that replacement of the ulnare by the pisiform was a terminal step in assembly of the dinosaurian flight apparatus that occurred close to the origins of flight in theropod dinosaurs, rather than a novelty restricted to birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-025-09232-3

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptations of the wrist necessary for wing folding evolved outside of Aves to protect elongate forelimb feathers.

    “Adaptations of the wrist necessary for wing folding evolved outside of Aves in order to protect the elongate forelimb feathers [41, 42].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Napoli, J. G., Fabbri, M., Ruebenstahl, A. A., O’Connor, J. K., Bhullar, B.-A. S., & Norell, M. A.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
Corresponding author
Napoli, James G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2025-07-09
Volume
644
Issue
8077
Pages
699-705
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4412151432
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 3
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
theropod dinosaurs, wrist, pisiform bone, Oviraptorosauria, Troodontidae, wing kinematics, Microraptor, Late Cretaceous
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Biological Evolution, Flight, Animal, Forelimb, Fossils, Phylogeny, Wings, Animal, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review