Cited by 30Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyAvian ecology and behaviorComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Functional constraints on the number and shape of flight feathers

Open access
Kiat, Yosef, O’Connor, Jingmai K.·2024·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

As a fundamental ecological aspect of most organisms, locomotor function significantly constrains morphology. At the same time, the evolution of novel locomotor abilities has produced dramatic morphological transformations, initiating some of the most significant diversifications in life history. Despite significant new fossil evidence, it remains unclear whether volant locomotion had a single or multiple origins in pennaraptoran dinosaurs and the volant abilities of individual taxa are controversial. The evolution of powered flight in modern birds involved exaptation of feathered surfaces extending off the limbs and tail yet most studies concerning flight potential in pennaraptorans do not account for the structure and morphology of the wing feathers themselves. Analysis of the number and shape of remex and rectrix feathers across a large dataset of extant birds indicates that the number of remiges and rectrices and the degree of primary vane asymmetry strongly correlate with locomotor ability revealing important functional constraints. Among these traits, phenotypic flexibility varies reflected by the different rates at which morphological changes evolve, such that some traits reflect the ancestral condition, whereas others reflect current locomotor function. While Mesozoic birds and Microraptor have remex morphologies consistent with extant volant birds, that of anchiornithines deviate significantly providing strong evidence this clade was not volant. The results of these analyses support a single origin of dinosaurian flight and indicate the early stages of feathered wing evolution are not sampled by the currently available fossil record.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2306639121

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The primaries of Archaeopteryx have an asymmetry value of 3.47.

    “The primaries have an asymmetry value of 3.47, within the range of volant neornithines (2.5-6.63) [5, 14].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Results section on primary feather asymmetry places Archaeopteryx and other stem birds within the asymmetry range of volant crown birds, and gives that range as 2.50–6.63. It does not give 3.47 as Archaeopteryx’s value; the reported 2.72–4.50 range covers multiple stem-bird taxa. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primary feathers of Archaeopteryx exhibit a degree of vane asymmetry within the range of extant volant birds, whereas these feathers are nearly symmetrical in non-avian pennaraptorans with the exception of the volant Microraptor.

    “the primary feathers exhibit a degree of vane asymmetry that is within the range of extant volant birds, whereas these feathers are nearly symmetrical in non-avian pennaraptorans with the exception of the volant Microraptor [5, 20]”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Anchiornis was non-volant.

    “it is increasingly clear from the morphology of the skeleton, forelimb feathers, molt pattern, and ontogenetic changes in proportions that this taxon was non-volant [2, 4-6]”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The Archaeopteryx wing is formed by 11 primaries.

    “As in volant neornithines (9-11 primaries), the Archaeopteryx wing is formed by 11 primaries, although the 11th specimen appears to have 12 [5].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The 11th specimen of Archaeopteryx appears to have 12 primaries.

    “As in volant neornithines (9-11 primaries), the Archaeopteryx wing is formed by 11 primaries, although the 11th specimen appears to have 12 [5].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [66]L. Jenni, R. Winkler, The Biology of Moult in Birds (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020).
  2. [68]W. Wang, J. K. O’Connor, Morphological coevolution of the pygostyle and tail feathers in Early Cretaceous birds. Vertebr. Palasiat. 55, 1 (2017).
  3. [76]P. Pyle, Identification Guide to North American Birds: Anatidae to Alcidae (Slate Creek Press, 2008).
  4. [95]J. K. O’Connor, Z. Xiao-Ting, H. U. Han, W. Xiao-Li, Z. Zhong-He, The morphology of Chiappeavis magnapremaxillo (Pengornithidae: Enantiornithes) and a comparison of aerodynamic function in Early Cretaceous avian tail fans. Vertebr. Palasiat. 55, 41 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiat, Y., & O’Connor, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Field Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605
Corresponding author
Kiat, Yosef
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-02-12
Volume
121
Issue
8
Pages
e2306639121-e2306639121
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4391757139
Cited by
30
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Field Museum (NA)
  • Zuckerman STEM (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
flight feathers, remiges, rectrices, Microraptor, Mesozoic birds, exaptation, phenotypic flexibility, functional constraints
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Biological Evolution, Feathers, Flight, Animal, Fossils, Locomotion, Phylogeny, Wings, Animal, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review