Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reply to ‘Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction’

Koren, Sergey, Phillippy, Adam M., Simpson, Jared T., Loman, Nicholas J., Loose, Matthew·2019·Nature Biotechnology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-018-0005-y

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Koren, S. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/271486 (2018). · DOI
  2. Lehmann, R. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/278267 (2018). · DOI
  3. Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907 (2012). · arXiv

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Koren, S., Phillippy, A. M., Simpson, J. T., Loman, N. J., & Loose, M.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2019-01-22
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
127-128
ISSN
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
Cited by
30
References
14
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reply to ‘Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-018-0005-y
The paper
Koren, S., Phillippy, A. M., Simpson, J. T., Loman, N. J., & Loose, M. (2019). Reply to ‘Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction’. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-018-0005-y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.