Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 580

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses

Open access
Forster, Samuel C., Kumar, Nitin, Anonye, Blessing O., Almeida, Alexandre, Viciani, Elisa, Stares, Mark D., Dunn, Matthew, Mkandawire, Tapoka T., Zhu, Ana, Shao, Yan, Pike, Lindsay J., Louie, Thomas, Browne, Hilary P., Mitchell, Alex L., Neville, B. Anne, Finn, Robert D., Lawley, Trevor D.·2019·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Understanding gut microbiome functions requires cultivated bacteria for experimental validation and reference bacterial genome sequences to interpret metagenome datasets and guide functional analyses. We present the Human Gastrointestinal Bacteria Culture Collection (HBC), a comprehensive set of 737 whole-genome-sequenced bacterial isolates, representing 273 species (105 novel species) from 31 families found in the human gastrointestinal microbiota. The HBC increases the number of bacterial genomes derived from human gastrointestinal microbiota by 37%. The resulting global Human Gastrointestinal Bacteria Genome Collection (HGG) classifies 83% of genera by abundance across 13,490 shotgun-sequenced metagenomic samples, improves taxonomic classification by 61% compared to the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) genome collection and achieves subspecies-level classification for almost 50% of sequences. The improved resource of gastrointestinal bacterial reference sequences circumvents dependence on de novo assembly of metagenomes and enables accurate and cost-effective shotgun metagenomic analyses of human gastrointestinal microbiota.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Green, M.R., Sambrook, J. & Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. 4th edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2012).

Cited by

See all 580

Metadata

Authors
Forster, S. C., Kumar, N., Anonye, B. O., Almeida, A., Viciani, E., Stares, M. D., Dunn, M., Mkandawire, T. T., Zhu, A., Shao, Y., Pike, L. J., Louie, T., Browne, H. P., Mitchell, A. L., Neville, B. A., Finn, R. D., & Lawley, T. D.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2019-02
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
186-192
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2912883243
Cited by
580
References
56
FWCI
25.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7
The paper
Forster, S. C., Kumar, N., Anonye, B. O., Almeida, A., Viciani, E., Stares, M. D., Dunn, M., Mkandawire, T. T., Zhu, A., Shao, Y., Pike, L. J., Louie, T., Browne, H. P., Mitchell, A. L., Neville, B. A., Finn, R. D., & Lawley, T. D. (2019). A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.