The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies
Open accessAbstract
To the Editor — Community-developed standards, such as those for the identification 1 , citation 2 and reporting 3 of data, underpin reproducible and reusable research, aid scholarly publishing, and drive both the discovery and the evolution of scientific practice. The number of these standardization efforts, driven by large organizations or at the grassroots level, has been on the rise since the early 2000s. Thousands of community-developed standards are available (across all disciplines), many of which have been created and/or implemented by several thousand data repositories. Nevertheless, their uptake by the research community has been slow and uneven mainly because investigators lack incentives to follow and adopt standards. Uptake is further compromised if standards are not promptly implemented by databases, repositories and other research tools, or endorsed by infrastructures. Furthermore, the fragmentation of community efforts results in the development of arbitrarily different, incompatible standards. In turn, this leads to standards becoming rapidly obsolete in fast-evolving research areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423
Self-citationTaylor, C. F., Field, D., Sansone, S.-A., Aerts, J., Apweiler, R., Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Binz, P.-A., Bogue, M., Booth, T., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1411 · Cited by 558
Self-citation
Cited by
Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021
Davis, A. P., Grondin, C. J., Johnson, R. J., Sciaky, D., Wiegers, J., Wiegers, T. C., & Mattingly, C. J. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa891 · Cited by 1,107
Towards FAIR Principles for Research Software
Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Martin Del Pico, E., Dominguez Del Angel, V., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., et al. (2020) · Data Science · doi:10.3233/ds-190026 · Cited by 322
Self-citationA review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
Burgelman, J.-C., Pascu, C., Szkuta, K., Von Schomberg, R., Karalopoulos, A., Repanas, K., & Schouppe, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2019.00043 · Cited by 215
The IUPHAR/BPS Guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2024
Harding, S. D., Armstrong, J. F., Faccenda, E., Southan, C., Alexander, S. P. H., Davenport, A. P., Spedding, M., & Davies, J. A. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad944 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Community, T. F., Sansone, S.-A., McQuilton, P., Rocca-Serra, P., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Izzo, M., Lister, A. L., & Thurston, M.
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 358-367
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2934450419
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
- The paper
- Community, T. F., Sansone, S.-A., McQuilton, P., Rocca-Serra, P., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Izzo, M., Lister, A. L., & Thurston, M. (2019). FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
