Cited by 193Computational Drug Discovery MethodsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classification

Prediction of drug efficacy from transcriptional profiles with deep learning

Zhu, Jie, Wang, Jingxiang, Wang, Xin, Gao, Mingjing, Guo, Bingbing, Gao, Miaomiao, Liu, Jiarui, Yu, Yanqiu +10 more·2021·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Drug discovery focused on target proteins has been a successful strategy, but many diseases and biological processes lack obvious targets to enable such approaches. Here, to overcome this challenge, we describe a deep learning-based efficacy prediction system (DLEPS) that identifies drug candidates using a change in the gene expression profile in the diseased state as input. DLEPS was trained using chemically induced changes in transcriptional profiles from the L1000 project. We found that the changes in transcriptional profiles for previously unexamined molecules were predicted with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.74. We examined three disorders and experimentally tested the top drug candidates in mouse disease models. Validation showed that perillen, chikusetsusaponin IV and trametinib confer disease-relevant impacts against obesity, hyperuricemia and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, respectively. DLEPS can generate insights into pathogenic mechanisms, and we demonstrate that the MEK-ERK signaling pathway is a target for developing agents against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Our findings suggest that DLEPS is an effective tool for drug repurposing and discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-021-00946-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 193

Authors
Zhu, J., Wang, J., Wang, X., Gao, M., Guo, B., Gao, M., Liu, J., Yu, Y., Wang, L., Kong, W., An, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, X., Huang, Z., Zhou, H., Zhang, N., Zheng, R., & Xie, Z.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Hong
  • Zhang, Ning
  • Zheng, Ruimao
  • Xie, Zhengwei
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2021-06-17
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
1444-1452
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W3192398644
Cited by
193
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
14.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
drug efficacy prediction, gene expression profiling, deep learning, drug repurposing, drug discovery, obesity, hyperuricemia, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, MEK/ERK signaling, trametinib, mouse models of human disease
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Proteins, Mice, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review