Prediction of drug efficacy from transcriptional profiles with deep learning
Abstract
Drug discovery focused on target proteins has been a successful strategy, but many diseases and biological processes lack obvious targets to enable such approaches. Here, to overcome this challenge, we describe a deep learning-based efficacy prediction system (DLEPS) that identifies drug candidates using a change in the gene expression profile in the diseased state as input. DLEPS was trained using chemically induced changes in transcriptional profiles from the L1000 project. We found that the changes in transcriptional profiles for previously unexamined molecules were predicted with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.74. We examined three disorders and experimentally tested the top drug candidates in mouse disease models. Validation showed that perillen, chikusetsusaponin IV and trametinib confer disease-relevant impacts against obesity, hyperuricemia and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, respectively. DLEPS can generate insights into pathogenic mechanisms, and we demonstrate that the MEK-ERK signaling pathway is a target for developing agents against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Our findings suggest that DLEPS is an effective tool for drug repurposing and discovery.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML has been used to identify small-molecule inhibitors of the protein MEK.
“The use of ML to identify small-molecule inhibitors of the protein MEK [22] has recently been described.”
From The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
An ML algorithm was able to identify novel inhibitors for the protein MEK.
“The ML algorithm was able to identify novel inhibitors for this protein.”
From The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Zhu, J., Wang, J., Wang, X., Gao, M., Guo, B., Gao, M., Liu, J., Yu, Y., Wang, L., Kong, W., An, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, X., Huang, Z., Zhou, H., Zhang, N., Zheng, R., & Xie, Z.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Hong
- Zhang, Ning
- Zheng, Ruimao
- Xie, Zhengwei
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2021-06-17
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1444-1452
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W3192398644
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- drug efficacy prediction, gene expression profiling, deep learning, drug repurposing, drug discovery, obesity, hyperuricemia, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, MEK/ERK signaling, trametinib, mouse models of human disease
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Animals, Proteins, Mice, Drug Discovery, Drug Repositioning, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review