Cited by 690Computational Drug Discovery MethodsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies

Open access
Blanco-González, Alexandre, Cabezón, Alfonso, Seco-González, Alejandro, Conde-Torres, Daniel, Antelo-Riveiro, Paula, Piñeiro, Ángel, Garcia-Fandino, Rebeca·2023·Pharmaceuticals

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process, offering improved efficiency, accuracy, and speed. However, the successful application of AI is dependent on the availability of high-quality data, the addressing of ethical concerns, and the recognition of the limitations of AI-based approaches. In this article, the benefits, challenges, and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed, and possible strategies and approaches for overcoming the present obstacles are proposed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods, as well as the potential advantages of AI in pharmaceutical research, are also discussed. Overall, this review highlights the potential of AI in drug discovery and provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for realizing its potential in this field. Note from the human authors: This article was created to test the ability of ChatGPT, a chatbot based on the GPT-3.5 language model, in terms of assisting human authors in writing review articles. The text generated by the AI following our instructions (see Supporting Information) was used as a starting point, and its ability to automatically generate content was evaluated. After conducting a thorough review, the human authors practically rewrote the manuscript, striving to maintain a balance between the original proposal and the scientific criteria. The advantages and limitations of using AI for this purpose are discussed in the last section.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that AI can improve the efficiency, accuracy, and speed of drug discovery, but its success depends on high-quality data, ethical safeguards, and recognition of AI’s limits. It also reports an experiment in which ChatGPT-assisted drafting required substantial human rewriting and had only 6% correct references in the preliminary AI-generated text.

Key findings

  • AI/ML can support prediction of drug efficacy and toxicity, drug–drug interactions, novel compound design, target identification, and case studies in cancer, Alzheimer’s, antibiotics, and COVID-19, though the review presents these as literature examples rather than new experimental results.
  • The paper identifies major barriers: limited or low-quality training data, ethical concerns including bias and fairness, data privacy/security, and job-loss concerns from automation.
  • Proposed strategies include data augmentation, explainable AI (XAI), and integration of AI with traditional experimental methods and human expertise.
  • In the writing experiment, the preliminary ChatGPT text had only 6% correct references; similarity to the final manuscript was identical 4.3%, minor changes 13.3%, and related meaning 16.3%. The authors conclude ChatGPT is not useful for reliable scientific texts without substantial human intervention.

Methods

  • Narrative review on AI in drug discovery, generated with assistance from ChatGPT (GPT-3.5), with human authors providing topic, section count, prompts, and instructions.
  • Human authors edited AI-generated text, corrected/enriched content, avoided repetitions and inconsistencies, and revised all AI-suggested references through iterative revisions.
  • The paper evaluated the AI-assisted process using similarity percentages between preliminary and final text and the percentage of correct references in the preliminary ChatGPT output.

Limitations

  • Stated: AI-based approaches require large volumes of suitable data; accessible data may be limited, low quality, or inconsistent, affecting accuracy and reliability.
  • Stated: AI cannot substitute for traditional experimental methods or human researchers’ expertise; predictions must be validated and interpreted by humans.
  • Stated: ChatGPT lacked ability to evaluate veracity/reliability, was trained in 2021 and not updated, and produced mostly incorrect references; the authors also note reviewers may struggle to distinguish AI-written from human-written articles. Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search strategy, and its drug-discovery examples are cited from other studies rather than independently validated here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ph16060891

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 67 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Interpretationcitation

    AI-based approaches can enable the rapid and efficient design of novel compounds with desirable properties and activities.

    “AI-based approaches, on the other hand, can enable the rapid and efficient design of novel compounds with desirable properties and activities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Combining ML and MD methodologies is being explored to take advantage of synergies between them.

    “The technique of combining these methodologies is being explored to take advantage of the synergies between them [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Bai, 2022, Application advances of deep learning methods for de novo drug design and molecular dynamics simulation, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning

    The use of AI in pharmaceutical research offers the ability to improve the prediction of the efficacy and toxicity of potential drug compounds.

    “The previous examples from the literature demonstrate that the use of AI in pharmaceutical research offers the ability to improve the prediction of the efficacy and toxicity of potential drug compounds.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    A deep learning algorithm trained on a dataset of known drug compounds and their biological activity was able to predict the activity of novel compounds with high accuracy.

    “For instance, a DL algorithm has recently been trained using a dataset of known drug compounds, along with their corresponding biological activity [11]. The algorithm was then able to predict the activity of novel compounds with high accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Hansen, 2015, Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: Accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisereasoning

    AI-based approaches can identify drug-drug interactions by analyzing large datasets of known drug interactions and recognizing patterns and trends.

    “This issue can be identified by AI-based approaches by analyzing large datasets of known drug interactions and recognizing the patterns and trends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    This paper was generated with the assistance of ChatGPT, a chatbot based on the GPT-3.5 language model, trained with a large corpus of text via OpenAI, which at that time did not have connection to the Internet.

    “This paper was generated with the assistance of ChatGPT, a chatbot based on the GPT-3.5 language model, trained with a large corpus of text via OpenAI [1], which at that time did not have connection to the Internet.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] (2022, December 06). OpenAI. ChatGPT (Dec 6 Version) [Large Language Model]. Available online: https://chat.openai.com/chat.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The total percentage of similarity between the preliminary text obtained directly from ChatGPT and the current version of the manuscript is: identical 4.3%, minor changes 13.3%, and related meaning 16.3%.

    “The total percentage of similarity between the preliminary text, obtained directly from ChatGPT, and the current version of the manuscript is: identical 4.3%, minor changes 13.3%, and related meaning 16.3% [2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] (2022, December 06). Plagiarism Detector Software|Anti-Plagiarism Tools|Copyleaks. Available online: https://copyleaks.com.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The percentage of correct references in the preliminary text obtained directly from ChatGPT was just 6%.

    “The percentage of correct references in the preliminary text, obtained directly from ChatGPT, was just 6%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the authors' experiment, revision of AI-generated text required major edits and corrections, including replacement of nearly all references because those provided by ChatGPT were clearly incorrect.

    “Our revision of the text, which was generated by the AI following our instructions, required the application of major edits and corrections, including the replacement of nearly all the references since those provided by the software were clearly incorrect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    ChatGPT was trained in 2021 and does not work with updated information.

    “Another important problem of the employed AI-based tool is that it was trained in 2021 and so does not work with updated information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    ChatGPT has advantages as an AI assistant to write scientific papers, including capacity to generate and optimize text quickly, and ability to help with organization of information or connecting ideas.

    “As an AI assistant to write scientific papers, ChatGPT has several advantages, including its capacity to generate and optimize text quickly, as well as its ability to help users with several tasks, including the organization of information or even connecting ideas in some cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The successful application of AI in drug discovery is dependent on the availability of high-quality data, the addressing of ethical concerns, and the recognition of the limitations of AI-based approaches.

    “However, the successful application of AI is dependent on the availability of high-quality data, the addressing of ethical concerns, and the recognition of the limitations of AI-based approaches.”
    • Also stated in: § 10. Conclusions and Summary of the Potential of AI for Revolutionizing Drug Discovery · plain
      “However, the successful application of AI in drug discovery is dependent on the availability of high-quality data, the addressing of ethical concerns, and the recognition of the limitations of AI-based approaches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI has the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process, offering improved efficiency, accuracy, and speed.

    “Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process, offering improved efficiency, accuracy, and speed.”
    • Also stated in: § 10. Conclusions and Summary of the Potential of AI for Revolutionizing Drug Discovery · plain
      “In conclusion, AI has the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process, offering improved efficiency and accuracy, accelerated drug development, and the capacity for the development of more effective and personalized treatments (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The use of AI in medicinal chemistry has gained significant attention in recent years as a potential means of revolutionizing the pharmaceutical industry.

    “The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicinal chemistry has gained significant attention in recent years as a potential means of revolutionizing the pharmaceutical industry [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Paul, 2021, Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development, Drug Discov. Today source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    AlphaFold represents a significant step forward in the use of AI in structural biology and life sciences.

    “AlphaFold represents a significant step forward in the use of AI in structural biology and life sciences in general.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI-based approaches have the ability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of drug discovery processes and can lead to the development of more effective medications.

    “AI-based approaches, on the other hand, have the ability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of drug discovery processes and can lead to the development of more effective medications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional methods of pharmaceutical research are limited by their reliance on trial-and-error experimentation and their inability to accurately predict the behavior of new potential bioactive compounds.

    “Thus, while traditional methods of pharmaceutical research have been relatively successful in the past, they are limited by their reliance on trial-and-error experimentation and their inability to accurately predict the behavior of new potential bioactive compounds [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Bannigan, 2021, Machine learning directed drug formulation development, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current medicinal chemistry methods can be slow, costly, and often yield results with low accuracy.

    “However, these methods can be slow, costly, and often yield results with low accuracy [6].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Pu, L., Naderi, M., Liu, T., Wu, H.C., Mukhopadhyay, S., and Brylinski, M. (2019). EToxPred: A machine learning-based approach to estimate the toxicity of drug candidates. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol., 20. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI can identify possible drug-drug interactions in personalized medicine, enabling custom-made treatment plans that minimize the risk of adverse reactions.

    “The role of AI to identify possible drug–drug interactions in the context of personalized medicine is also relevant, enabling the development of custom-made treatment plans that minimize the risk of adverse reactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI can enable the development of more effective and safer medications and accelerate the drug discovery process.

    “This can enable the development of more effective and safer medications and accelerate the drug discovery process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current medicinal chemistry methods can be limited by the availability of suitable test compounds and the difficulty of accurately predicting their behavior in the body.

    “In addition, they can be limited by the availability of suitable test compounds and the difficulty of accurately predicting their behavior in the body [9].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Chen, R., Liu, X., Jin, S., Lin, J., and Liu, J. (2018). Machine learning for drug-target interaction prediction. Molecules, 23. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collaboration between AI researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can help improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical trials by using AI algorithms to analyze trial data to identify trends and potential adverse effects.

    “This collaboration can also help improve the accuracy and efficiency of clinical trials, as AI algorithms can be used to analyze the data collected during these trials to identify trends and the potential adverse effects of the drugs being tested.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    AI-based methods can accelerate the drug discovery process and enable the development of more effective medications.

    “Many more examples are available [3,32,33,34,35,36,37], showing that AI-based methods can accelerate the drug discovery process and enable the development of more effective medications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [3] Paul, 2021, Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development, Drug Discov. Today source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] Vatansever, 2021, Artificial intelligence and machine learning-aided drug discovery in central nervous system diseases: State-of-the-arts and future directions, Med. Res. Rev. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Farghali, 2021, The Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development, Physiol. Res. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] Ganesh, G.S., Kolusu, A.S., Prasad, K., Samudrala, P.K., and Nemmani, K.V.S. (2022). Advancing health care via artificial intelligence: From concept to clinic. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 934. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [35] Koromina, 2019, Rethinking Drug Repositioning and Development with Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Omics, OMICS A J. Integr. Biol. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] Mak, 2019, Artificial intelligence in drug development: Present status and future prospects, Drug Discov. Today source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Fleming, 2018, How artificial intelligence is changing drug discovery spotlight, Nature source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    AI in the pharmaceutical industry raises concerns about job losses due to automation.

    “The use of AI in the pharmaceutical industry also raises concerns about job losses due to automation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    AI in the pharmaceutical industry raises questions about data privacy and security.

    “Additionally, the use of AI in the pharmaceutical industry raises questions about data privacy and security.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    As AI systems rely on large amounts of data, there is a risk that sensitive personal information could be accessed or misused.

    “As AI systems rely on large amounts of data to function, there is a risk that sensitive personal information could be accessed or misused.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Using AI algorithms to analyze data from large populations can identify trends and patterns that help predict the effectiveness of potential drug candidates for specific patient populations and tailor treatments.

    “By using AI algorithms to analyze data from large populations, they can be used to identify trends and patterns that can help predict the effectiveness of potential drug candidates for specific patient populations, which can help tailor treatments to the needs of individual patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The amount of accessible data may be limited, or data may be of low quality or inconsistent, which can affect the accuracy and reliability of AI results.

    “In many cases, the amount of data that is accessible may be limited, or the data may be of low quality or inconsistent, which can affect the accuracy and reliability of the results [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Wei, 2018, Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules, ACS Central Sci. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    AI can only provide predictions based on the data available, and the results must be validated and interpreted by human researchers.

    “AI can only provide predictions based on the data available, and the results must then be validated and interpreted by human researchers [52].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Gilpin, L.H., Bau, D., Yuan, B.Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M., and Kagal, L. (2018, January 1–3). Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, DSAA Turin, Itali. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many new companies are arising around AI in drug discovery and their impact is expected to be significant in the short term.

    “Many new companies are currently arising around this area of research and their impact is expected to be significant in the short term [39].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] (2022, December 06). 11 Companies Using Pharma AI to Stimulate Growth in the Industry. Available online: https://www.p360.com/data360/11-companies-using-pharma-ai-to-stimulate-growth-in-the-industry-1/.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collaboration between AI researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can help improve the accessibility and affordability of healthcare.

    “Furthermore, collaboration between AI researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can also help to improve the accessibility and affordability of healthcare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Explainable AI methods can help address concerns about bias and fairness in AI-based approaches and provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and assumptions behind predictions.

    “This can help to address concerns about bias and fairness in AI-based approaches [43] and provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and assumptions behind the predictions [49].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43] Kleinberg, J. (2018, January 18–22). Inherent Trade-Offs in Algorithmic Fairness. Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, Irvine, CA, USA. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] Arrieta, 2020, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Inf. Fusion source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collaboration between AI researchers and pharmaceutical scientists can help create powerful algorithms and machine-learning models intended to predict the efficacy of potential drug candidates and speed up the drug discovery process.

    “By combining their expertise and knowledge, they can create powerful algorithms and machine-learning models intended to predict the efficacy of potential drug candidates and speed up the drug discovery process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Current AI-based approaches are not a substitute for traditional experimental methods and cannot replace the expertise and experience of human researchers.

    “Current AI-based approaches are not a substitute for traditional experimental methods, and they cannot replace the expertise and experience of human researchers [50,51].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [50] Grebner, 2021, Application of Deep Neural Network Models in Drug Discovery Programs, ChemMedChem source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [51] Schraagen, J.M., and van Diggelen, J. (2021). Expertise at Work, Palgrave Macmillan.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Recent developments in AI, including data augmentation, explainable AI, and integration with traditional experimental methods, offer promising strategies for overcoming challenges and limitations of AI in drug discovery.

    “Recent developments in AI, including the use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods, offer promising strategies for overcoming the challenges and limitations of AI in the context of drug discovery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A pioneering ML approach identified powerful types of antibiotic from a pool of more than 100 million molecules, including one that works against a wide range of bacteria, such as tuberculosis and untreatable bacterial strains.

    “A pioneering ML approach has identified powerful types of antibiotic from a pool of more than 100 million molecules, including one that works against a wide range of bacteria, such as tuberculosis and untreatable bacterial strains [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Marchant, J. (Nature, 2020). Powerful antibiotics discovered using AI, Nature, Online ahead of print. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Growing levels of interest and attention from researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies, combined with the potential benefits of AI, make this an exciting and promising area of research, with the potential to transform the drug discovery process.

    “The growing levels of interest and attention from researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies, combined with the potential benefits of AI, make this an exciting and promising area of research, with the potential to transform the drug discovery process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Merck and Numerate collaborated to develop AI-based approaches for medicinal chemistry.

    “An illustrative example is the collaboration between the pharmaceutical company Merck and the AI company Numerate to develop AI-based approaches for medicinal chemistry [38].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] (2022, December 06). Available online: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/numerate-forms-drug-discovery-collaboration-merck-to-utilize-numerate-s-silico-drug-design.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The language and style used by ChatGPT may not be suitable for academic writing.

    “Additionally, the language and style used by ChatGPT may not be suitable for academic writing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most of these problems could be solved relatively quickly, introducing new and urgent challenges regarding control of apparently new content.

    “Most of these problems could be solved relatively quickly, which introduces new and urgent challenges regarding the control of apparently new content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Scientific text generated by ChatGPT will definitely contain errors or misleading information.

    “As a result, scientific text generated by ChatGPT will definitely contain errors or misleading information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    ChatGPT is not yet ready to be used in the production of scientific articles.

    “One of the main reasons why this AI is not yet ready to be used in the production of scientific articles is its lack of ability to evaluate the veracity and reliability of the information that it processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The incorrect references provided by ChatGPT represent a key difference with respect to other computational tools such as typical web browsers, which are focused on providing reliable references.

    “This is a huge problem with ChatGPT, and it represents a key difference with respect to other computational tools such as typical web browsers, which are focused on providing reliable references for the required information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Losing trust in the accuracy and integrity of scientific research could have a detrimental impact on the progress of science.

    “Losing trust in the accuracy and integrity of scientific research could have a detrimental impact on the progress of science.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    One of the biggest dangers is the potential for the proliferation of false information in scientific articles, which could lead to a devaluation of the scientific enterprise itself.

    “One of the biggest dangers is the potential for the proliferation of false information in scientific articles, which could lead to a devaluation of the scientific enterprise itself.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    ChatGPT lacks the ability to evaluate the veracity and reliability of the information it processes.

    “One of the main reasons why this AI is not yet ready to be used in the production of scientific articles is its lack of ability to evaluate the veracity and reliability of the information that it processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
41 of 41
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reviewers may find it not a trivial matter to distinguish between an article written by a human or by ChatGPT.

    “It is also important to note that reviewers may find it not a trivial matter to distinguish between an article written by a human or by this AI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Predatory journals may exploit the opportunity for quick production of scientific articles to generate large amounts of low-quality content.

    “A real risk is that predatory journals may exploit the opportunity for the quick production of scientific articles to generate large amounts of low-quality content.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Predatory journals are often motivated by profit rather than a commitment to scientific advancement.

    “These journals, often motivated by profit rather than a commitment to scientific advancement, may use AI to rapidly produce articles, flooding the market with subpar research that undermines the credibility of the scientific community.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Predatory journals may use AI to rapidly produce articles, flooding the market with subpar research that undermines the credibility of the scientific community.

    “These journals, often motivated by profit rather than a commitment to scientific advancement, may use AI to rapidly produce articles, flooding the market with subpar research that undermines the credibility of the scientific community.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 690

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schraagen, J.M., and van Diggelen, J. (2021). Expertise at Work, Palgrave Macmillan.

Authors
Blanco-González, A., Cabezón, A., Seco-González, A., Conde-Torres, D., Antelo-Riveiro, P., Piñeiro, Á., & Garcia-Fandino, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
  • Department of Organic Chemistry, Center for Research in Biological Chemistry and Molecular Materials, University of Santiago de Compostela, CIQUS, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Corresponding author
Piñeiro, Ángel
Venue
Pharmaceuticals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-18
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
891
ISSN
1424-8247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381252028
Cited by
690
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 161 · 2025: 251 · 2024: 207 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 1
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmaceuticals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the ERDF (RTI2018-098795-A-I00, PID2019-111327GB-I00, PDC2022-133402-I00, ED431F 2020/05, ED431B 2022/36, 06_IN606D_2021_2600276, ED431G/09, RYC-2016-20335, ED481A 2022/290)
  • Xunta de Galicia and the ERDF (RTI2018-098795-A-I00, PID2019-111327GB-I00, PDC2022-133402-I00, ED431F 2020/05, ED431B 2022/36, 06_IN606D_2021_2600276, ED431G/09, RYC-2016-20335, ED481A 2022/290)
  • Centro Singular de Investigación de Galicia (RTI2018-098795-A-I00, PID2019-111327GB-I00, PDC2022-133402-I00, ED431F 2020/05, ED431B 2022/36, 06_IN606D_2021_2600276, ED431G/09, RYC-2016-20335, ED481A 2022/290)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades for a “Ramón y Cajal” contract (RTI2018-098795-A-I00, PID2019-111327GB-I00, PDC2022-133402-I00, ED431F 2020/05, ED431B 2022/36, 06_IN606D_2021_2600276, ED431G/09, RYC-2016-20335, ED481A 2022/290)
  • Xunta de Galicia for a predoctoral contract (RTI2018-098795-A-I00, PID2019-111327GB-I00, PDC2022-133402-I00, ED431F 2020/05, ED431B 2022/36, 06_IN606D_2021_2600276, ED431G/09, RYC-2016-20335, ED481A 2022/290)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence, drug discovery, data quality, ethical considerations, explainable AI, data augmentation, ChatGPT, AI limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review