Cited by 23Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Single-cell proteomic landscape of the developing human brain

Open access
Wu, Tianzhi, Jiang, Lihua, Mukhtar, Tanzila, Wang, Li, Jian, Ruiqi, Wang, Cheng, Trinh, Tiffany, Kriegstein, Arnold R. +2 more·2026·Nature Biotechnology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Profiling protein abundance and dynamics at single-cell resolution in complex human tissues is challenging. Given the discordance between transcript and protein abundance observed in studies of the human cerebral cortex, we developed an optimized workflow that combines label-free single-cell mass spectrometry with precise sample preparation to resolve quantitative proteomes of individual cells from the developing human brain. Our method achieves deep proteomic coverage (~800 proteins per cell) even in small immature prenatal human neurons (diameter ~7-10 μm, ~50 pg protein), capturing major brain cell types and enabling proteome-wide characterization at single-cell resolution. We document extensive transcriptome-proteome discordance across cell types, particularly in genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Proteins exhibit markedly higher cell-type specificity than their mRNA counterparts, underscoring the importance of proteomic-level analysis. By reconstructing developmental trajectories from radial glia to excitatory neurons at the proteomic level, we identify dynamic, stage-specific protein co-expression modules and pinpoint the intermediate progenitor-to-neuron transition as a genetically vulnerable phase associated with autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41587-025-02980-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wu, T., Jiang, L., Mukhtar, T., Wang, L., Jian, R., Wang, C., Trinh, T., Kriegstein, A. R., Snyder, M., & Li, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kriegstein, Arnold R.
  • Snyder, Michael
  • Li, Jingjing
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2026-01-27
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
1391-1404
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W7125786661
Cited by
23
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 2
FWCI
32.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
single-cell proteomics, human brain development, label-free mass spectrometry, neurodevelopmental disorders, autism spectrum disorder, radial glia, excitatory neurons, developmental trajectories, cell type specificity
MeSH terms
Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Neurodevelopment, Brain, Humans, Neurons, Proteome, Proteomics, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review