The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We introduce multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG), a method for joint analysis of summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of different traits, possibly from overlapping samples. We apply MTAG to summary statistics for depressive symptoms (N eff = 354,862), neuroticism (N = 168,105), and subjective well-being (N = 388,538). As compared to the 32, 9, and 13 genome-wide significant loci identified in the single-trait GWAS (most of which are themselves novel), MTAG increases the number of associated loci to 64, 37, and 49, respectively. Moreover, association statistics from MTAG yield more informative bioinformatics analyses and increase the variance explained by polygenic scores by approximately 25%, matching theoretical expectations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“C-GWAS has been shown to have increased statistical power compared to traditional methods such as minimal p-values of multiple single-trait GWASs (MinGWAS) and MTAG [5]”
From Combined genome-wide association study of 136 quantitative ear morphology traits in multiple populations reveal 8 novel loci (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“and has been previously associated with both MD and neuroticism (Turley et al., 2018; Wray et al., 2018).”
From Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Turley et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Using this method, we discovered 1,193 independent, genome-wide significantly associated common variants (MAF > 1%; 173 for AgeSmk, 89 CigDay, 83 SmkCes, 692 SmkInit, and 156 DrnkWk) listed in Supplementary Table 12”
From Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use (2019) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2011) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,279
Self-citationClustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points
Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1136800 · Cited by 6,855
LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B. K., Loh, P.-R., Finucane, H. K., Ripke, S., Yang, J., Patterson, N., Daly, M. J., Price, A. L., & Neale, B. M. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3211 · Cited by 5,559 · cited 3×
“Using the GWAS results, we obtain an estimate of h 2 using LD score regression 14 and an estimate of R E( ) k 2 from the predictive power of the GWAS-based polygenic score.”
Self-citationGenetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology
Study, T. L. C., Locke, A. E., The ADIPOGen Consortium, The AGEN-BMI Working Group, The CARDIOGRAMplusC4D Consortium, The CKDGen Consortium, The, G. L. G. C., The, I. C. B. P., The MAGIC Investigators, The MuTHER Consortium, et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14177 · Cited by 4,534
Self-citationAn atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
ReproGen Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., Gusev, A., Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Duncan, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3406 · Cited by 4,255 · cited 2×
“Next, bivariate LD score regressions 6 are run using each pair of GWAS results, and the estimated intercepts are used to construct the off-diagonal elements of Σ (cid:31) j .”
Self-citationGlutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568 · cited 2×
“Moreover, the particular glutamate receptor genes prioritized by DEPICT ( GRIK3 , GRM1 , GRM5 , and GRM8 ) suggest the importance of processes involving communication between neurons on an intermediate time scale 18,19 , such as learning and memory.”
Cohort Profile: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS)
Sonnega, A., Faul, J. D., Ofstedal, M. B., Langa, K. M., Phillips, J. W., & Weir, D. R. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu067 · Cited by 2,318 · cited 7×
“We again used the HRS and Add Health cohorts as our prediction samples (and obtained the SNP effect estimates for SWB from the analyses that omitted HRS from the discovery sample).”
InfluentialThe Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium, Wood, A. R., The MIGen Consortium, The PAGE Consortium, Study, T. L. C., Esko, T., Yang, J., Vedantam, S., Pers, T. H., Gustafsson, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3097 · Cited by 1,853
New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution
The ADIPOGen Consortium, Shungin, D., The CARDIOGRAMplusC4D Consortium, The CKDGen Consortium, The GEFOS Consortium, The GENIE Consortium, The, G. L. G. C., The, I. C. B. P., The International Endogene Consortium, Study, T. L. C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14132 · Cited by 1,580
Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores
Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Yang, J., Finucane, H. K., Gusev, A., Lindström, S., Ripke, S., Genovese, G., Loh, P.-R., Bhatia, G., Do, R., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.09.001 · Cited by 1,303
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Mountford, H. S., Eising, E., Fontanillas, P., Auton, A., Irving-Pease, E. K., Doust, C., Bates, T. C., Martin, N. G., Fisher, S. E., & Michelle Luciano, A. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.02.15.24302884 · Cited by 3
“Constituent univariate GWAS χ 2 statistics were calculated by MTAG for dyslexia (χ 2 = 1.66) and GenLang word reading (χ 2 = 1.08), and multivariate GWAS (χ 2 = 1.35).”
MethodInfluentialHan, R., Huang, J., Zeng, N., Xie, F., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., & Fan, J. (2023) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-023-01151-3 · Cited by 2
“developed a method, multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG), that allows the meta-analysis of genetically correlated traits to increase power to identify more susceptibility loci in any one of the traits [16].”
MethodZhou, C., Yang, L., Liu, C., Ma, H., Yang, F., & Chen, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364735 · Cited by 3
He, W., Võsa, U., Palumaa, T., Ong, J., Díaz‐Torres, S., Hewitt, A. W., Mackey, D. A., Gharahkhani, P., Esko, T., & MacGregor, S. (2024) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddae157 · Cited by 2
Fu, J. (2025) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2025.100157 · Cited by 2
Wang, P., Tai, Y., Zhu, X., Wan, X., Sun, A., Wang, J., Cheng, H., Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. (2025) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-025-04205-9 · Cited by 2
“We employed the FUSION [30] method to identify associations at the gene transcript level with ss and brain structure phenotypes.”
Investigating shared genetic architecture between major depressive disorder and central obesity
Zhan, Y., Zhao, N., Zhao, Q., Wu, C., Yuan, S., Yu, X., Zheng, X., Liu, C., Hai, R., Liu, Z., et al. (2025) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.24333 · Cited by 2
“To identify shared risk SNPs associated with the combined phenotype (MDD-WHR), a cross-trait meta-analysis of GWAS was conducted using multitrait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) [18] and cross-phenotype association (CPASSOC) methods [ 19].”
Güler, M., & Canzian, F. (2025) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/s41408-025-01351-4 · Cited by 2
Zhang, W., Qiu, L., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Tang, M., Chen, L., Zhang, B., & Jiang, X. (2025) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1155/da/5250758 · Cited by 2
“We performed a multitrait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) to identify shared genetic variants in fl uencing pairs of traits [21].”
Large-scale composite hypothesis testing procedure for omics data analyses
Walsche, A. D., Gauthier, F., Boissot, N., Charcosset, A., & Mary‐Huard, T. (2025) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf118 · Cited by 2
The genetics of fibromyalgia and its relationships to psychiatric and medical traits
Bright, U., Beck, S., Levey, D. F., Deak, J. D., Program, T. V. M. V., Gaziano, J. M., Stein, M. B., & Gelernter, J. E. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75256-6 · Cited by 3
“We used MRlap to assess the inferred causality between genetic liability to fi bromyalgia and genetic liability to traits that had a signi fi cant effect in the LDSC analyses.”
Wang, Z., Yu, M., & Wang, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19697-x · Cited by 2
“Multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) presents an efficient way to detect genetic risk variations across traits, effectively leveraging the genetic structure of shared traits to enhance detection capabilities 13 .”
Han, T., Qu, Y., Zhu, J., Sha, L., Lei, B., Xiang, R., Zhao, X., Hou, J., Deng, Q., Zheng, S., et al. (2025) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2025.117719 · Cited by 2
“…investigate whether the genetic variants had independent effects on both traits, we performed a cross-trait meta-analysis using multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) [14], Cross-Phenotype Association (CPASSOC) [15], and Pleiotropic Locus Exploration and Interpretation using Optimal test (PLEIO) [16].”
Zhang, M., Wu, Y., & Qin, Y. (2025) · Psychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1097/ypg.0000000000000410 · Cited by 2
Comprehensive genomic insights into the genetic causality and comorbidity in urological cancers
Zhang, X., Yang, F., Tao, J., Wang, K., Xu, K., Liu, T., Chen, J., Li, H., Cheng, A., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-01235-7 · Cited by 2
Kealhofer, M., Brown, R. C., Riley, B. P., & Nguyen, T.-H. (2025) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf162 · Cited by 2
“However, joint analysis of multiple traits can additionally accommodate heterogeneity in the effects of variants or genes across traits [ 29 , 30 ], and has identified shared common variant associations [ 31–34 ] and additional risk loci [ 33 , 35 ].”
Psychological Resilience and Mental Wellbeing Mitigate the Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Zhang, M., Wellens, J., Zhao, J., Ji, H., Sun, J., Li, X., Kalla, R., Ding, Y. C., Τheodoratou, E., Satsangi, J. J., et al. (2025) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003833 · Cited by 3
He, Y., Lu, W., Jee, Y. H., Shih, M.-Y., Wang, Y., Tsuo, K., Qian, D. C., Diao, J. A., Huang, H., Patel, C. J., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02470-1 · Cited by 6
“We then used PRS-CSx to jointly model trait-specific MTAG results across ancestry groups to derive candidate scores 30,31 to include in the final PRSxtra.”
InfluentialZhou, X., Lu, J., Wang, Z., Cheng, K. K., & Li, G. H. (2026) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.70565 · Cited by 2
“Here we employed GWAS meta-analysis and multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) 11 to identify additional loci for BCAAs and their catabolites, followed by testing causal inference across 10 T2D-related traits using bidirectional MR framework.”
Kim, M. J., Gunn, S., Wang, D., Shiau, F., Lazcano, P., Mann, J. J., & Singh, T. (2026) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-026-03827-8 · Cited by 1
“Additionally, the incorporation of analytical approaches like multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) [18], which improves statistical power by jointly analyzing genetically correlated traits, and conditional and conjunctional false discovery rate (condFDR and conjFDR) [19, 20], which identi fi es…”
InfluentialTrimarchi, M. P., Namjou‐Khales, B., Morgenstern, N. B.-B., Rochman, M., Chen, X., Osswald, G. A., Besse, J. A., Shook, M., Caldwell, J. M., Lape, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2026.03.008 · Cited by 2
Genetic architecture of sleep in a genome wide association study of device measured sleep traits
Portas, L., Yuan, H., Cai, L., Smith-Byrne, K., van Duijvenboden, S., Kyle, S. D., Ray, D. W., Howson, J. M. M., & Doherty, A. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71252-y · Cited by 2
“MTAG performs a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics across genetically correlated traits, addressing sample overlap to enhance power and precision 33 .”
Wang, M., Cao, X., Zhang, S., & Sha, Q. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30415-3 · Cited by 2
“It has been shown that the LD score regression which has been commonly used in recent years can control the potential confounders such as population stratification, unknown sample overlap, cryptic relatedness, and so forth 20–22 .”
BackgroundMethodDeng, Q., Song, C. W., & Lin, S. (2023) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-023-01389-7 · Cited by 2
“Linkage disequilibrium score regression is another option, which may be potentially suited when there are sample overlaps across studies [8, 16].”
GCPBayes pipeline: a tool for exploring pleiotropy at the gene level
Asgari, Y., Sugier, P., Baghfalaki, T., Lucotte, E. A., Karimi, M., Sedki, M., Ngo, A., Liquet, B., & Truong, T. (2023) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqad065 · Cited by 2
Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS): Concept and Methodology for Gene Mapping in Plants
Sahu, T. K., Singh, M., Kalia, S., & Singh, A. K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26669-0_17 · Cited by 3
Cho, J. M., Koh, J. H., Kim, S. G., Lee, S., Kim, Y., Cho, S., Kim, K., Kim, Y. C., Han, S. S., Lee, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/jgh.16355 · Cited by 2
“8 As well-powered MR studies rely on the strength of genetic instruments, applying these strong genetic instruments offers robust MR results in our study.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationXi, D., Cui, D., Zhang, J., Shang, M., Zhang, M., Guo, L., Han, J., & Du, L. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43904-9_60 · Cited by 2
Kim, K., Jun, T., Ha, B., Wang, S., & Sun, H. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05505-8 · Cited by 2
“For example, recent studies have successfully identified pleiotropic variants using multi-phenotype association models which can increase the statistical power of detecting SNPs [6, 7].”
BackgroundLin, F., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, T., Lu, T., Jiang, M., Yang, K., Jia, M., Zhang, D., & Wang, L. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23677 · Cited by 2
Boetto, C., Frouin, A., Henches, L., Auvergne, A., Suzuki, Y., Patin, É., Bredon, M., Chiu, A. M., Sankararaman, S., Zaitlen, N., et al. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae272 · Cited by 4
“The joint analysis of multiple outcomes can increase statistical power to detect associations [7, 8], help in deciphering complex biological processes through clustering approaches [9] or improve the prediction accuracy of an outcome of interest [10].”
BackgroundShared and Unique Genetic Links between Neuroticism and Gastrointestinal Tract Diseases
Tian, Y., Zi, J., Hu, Y., Zeng, Y., Li, H., Luo, H., & Xiong, J. (2024) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1155/2024/5515448 · Cited by 2
“To identify SNPs related to joint phenotypes of pairwise traits, we used multitrait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) and the recently developed pleiotropic analysis under the composite null hypothesis (PLACO) [14, 15].”
Xi, D., Cui, D., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Shang, M., Guo, L., Han, J., & Du, L. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.08.027 · Cited by 2
“Further, MTAG was proposed only aims to the traits whose GWAS estimates were correlated [22], CONFIT needs a prior which is hard to obtain in practical [23], and MTAR only considers variations of one gene each time [24,25].”
BackgroundFu, S., Wheeler, W., Wang, X., Hua, X., Godbole, D., Duan, J., Zhu, B., Deng, L., Qin, F., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011322 · Cited by 3
Xu, C., Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Lu, M., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Shi, L., Cheng, L., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.03.003 · Cited by 2
Erdelyi-Hamza, B., Torok, D., Krause, S., Eszlari, N., Bagdy, G., Juhász, G., & Gonda, X. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.119731 · Cited by 1
DrFARM: identification of pleiotropic genetic variants in genome-wide association studies
Chan, L. S., Li, G., Fauman, E. B., Yin, X., Laakso, M., Boehnke, M., & Song, P. X. ‐. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60439-4 · Cited by 2
Genetic analyses of eight complex diseases using predicted continuous representations of disease
Chen, R. K., Rocheleau, G., Petrazzini, B. O., Forrest, I. S., Park, J. K., Duffy, Á., Vy, H. M. T., Jordan, D. M., & Do, R. (2025) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2025.101115 · Cited by 4
“To explain why combined PRSs outperformed case-control PRSs, we investigated the extent to which case-control and predicted PRSs were complementary.”
InfluentialDistinct patterns of genetic overlap among multimorbidities revealed with trivariate MiXeR
Shadrin, A. A., Hindley, G., Hagen, E., Parker, N., Tesfaye, M., Jaholkowski, P. P., Rahman, Z., Kutrolli, G., Fominykh, V., Djurovic, S., et al. (2025) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-025-01528-3 · Cited by 11
“These pleiotropy-motivated methods cover various actively developing domains of statistical genetics analysis, including MTAG [13] and sfFDR [14] for improved discovery of genetic loci, mvSuSiE [15] and CAFEH [16] for fine-mapping, mr.mash-rss [17] and MT-Bayes [18] for polygenic prediction, and…”
Zhou, J., Dou, X., Wu, X., Li, Y., Wang, S., & Kang, J. (2025) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-025-07693-5 · Cited by 2
“By incorporating LDSC, MTAG adjusts for sample overlap between related traits, thereby enhancing the statistical power to detect trait-specific genetic associations [29].”
Timsina, J., Jiang, C., McCartney, D. L., Tao, F., Dalmasso, M. C., Najar, J., Anastasi, F., Ohlei, O., Puerta, R., Yang, C., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71682-8 · Cited by 5
“Similarly, rs75840268 had signi fi cantly different effect size between CO and AD ( p =6.44×10 − 06 ) and with the meta-analysis ( p =2.8 × 10 − 04 ) with an opposite direction of effect betweenADandCO(SupplementaryFigs.13,14).”
InfluentialFinding hidden treasures in summary statistics from genome-wide association studies
Privé, F., Zhu, Z., & Vilhjálmsson, B. J. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00824-z · Cited by 2
Bi-Level Structured Functional Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Studies
Wu, M., Wang, F., Ge, Y., Ma, S., & Li, Y. (2023) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13871 · Cited by 2
Insulin-related traits and prostate cancer: A Mendelian randomization study
Chen, G., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.034 · Cited by 2
“The MTAG is designed to enhance statistical power in detecting genetic associations by jointly analyzing GWAS results for multiple related traits [29].”
MethodJiang, Y., Song, Y., Li, Y., Tong, Y., Ding, H., Li, L., Yang, Z., Meng, Z., Guo, M., Su, S. W., et al. (2024) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2024.05.004 · Cited by 2
Brikell, I. (2018) · Figshare · Cited by 2
Type-2 diabetes with low LDL-C: genetic insights into a unique phenotypePreprint
Klimentidis, Y. C., Arora, A., Newell, M., Zhou, J. J., Ordovás, J. M., Renquist, B. J., & Wood, A. C. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/837013 · Cited by 2
Dissecting the genetic overlap of education, socioeconomic status, and mental healthPreprint
Wendt, F. R., Pathak, G. A., Lencz, T., Krystal, J. H., Gelernter, J. E., & Polimanti, R. A. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.01.09.20017079 · Cited by 3
“Second is multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG), which jointly analyses GWAS summary statistics and adjusts per-SNP effect estimates and association p-values using the strength of the genetic correlation between phenotypes (16).”
BackgroundMethodAmin, V., Behrman, J. R., Fletcher, J. M., Flores, C. A., Flores‐Lagunes, A., & Kohler, H. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/684688 · Cited by 2
“A PGS constructed using MTAG summary statistics has more predictive power than a PGS that employs standard GWAS summary statistics (Turley et al. 2018).”
InfluentialThe Genetic Determinants of Aortic DistensionPreprint
Pirruccello, J. P., Choi, S. H., Chaffin, M. D., Nekoui, M., Chou, E. L., Jurgens, S. J., Friedman, S. F., Juric, D., Stone, J. R., Batra, P., et al. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.10.16.21265089 · Cited by 2
“In the present study, we did not report MTAG-enhanced results because we found MTAG to have a high maximum false discovery rate (maxFDR) for our aortic measurements (maxFDR of 15% for ascending and 25% for descending distensibility; Supplementary Note ), which is more likely to occur in scenarios where the analyzed tr…”
InfluentialSinkala, M., Elsheikh, S. S. M., Mbiyavanga, M., Cullinan, J., & Mulder, N. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.02.27.22268990 · Cited by 2
Huang, X., Yao, M., Tian, P., Wong, J. Y. Y., Li, Z., Liu, Z., & Zhao, J. V. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.05.21.22275413 · Cited by 2
Xu, H., Toikumo, S., Crist, R. C., Glogowska, K., Deak, J. D., Gelernter, J. E., Johnson, E. C., Kranzler, H. R., & Kember, R. L. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.07.06.22277340 · Cited by 2
Westergaard, D., Jørgensen, F. H., Waaben, J., Lademann, M., Hansen, T. F., Cremers, J., Ostrowski, S. R., Pedersen, O. B., Requant, R., Jørgensen, I. F., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.02.08.23285642 · Cited by 2
StocSum: stochastic summary statistics for whole genome sequencing studiesPreprint
Wang, N., Yu, B., Jun, G., Qi, Q., Durazo-Arvizú, R., Lindström, S., Morrison, A. C., Kaplan, R. C., Boerwinkle, E., & Chen, H. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.06.535886 · Cited by 2
Pettersson, O. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.02.565287 · Cited by 2
“Multi-trait PGIs have been shown to outperform standard, single-trait PGIs in terms of predictive accuracy (Becker et al. 2021; Turley et al. 2018).”
BackgroundDavis, C. N., Khan, Y., Toikumo, S., Jinwala, Z., Boomsma, D. I., Levey, D. F., Gelernter, J. E., Kember, R. L., & Kranzler, H. R. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4228593/v1 · Cited by 2
“41 Exploratory Analysis Genetic Correlations.”
Narayan, V. P., Tanwar, V., Andersen, J. K., & Kapahi, P. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4351073/v1 · Cited by 2
The Association between Endometriosis and Immunological diseasesPreprint
Shigesi, N., Harris, H. R., Fang, H., Ndungu, A., Lincoln, M. R., Cotsapas, C. J., Knight, J. C., Missmer, S. A., Morris, A. P., Becker, C. M., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.07.08.24310092 · Cited by 2
Bian, S., Bass, A. J., Liu, Y., Wingo, A. P., Wingo, T. S., Cutler, D. J., & Epstein, M. P. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.10.612314 · Cited by 2
Dias, J., Chen, T., Hua, X., Wang, X., Rodriguez, A. A., Madduri, R., Kraft, P., & Zhang, H. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.11.25323772 · Cited by 2
“; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.11.25323772 doi: medRxiv preprint methodological advancements, such as multi-trait 38 or ancestry-aware fine-mapping approaches 39 , could refine pooled analysis to better capture ancestry-specific effects.”
InfluentialPleiotropic heritability quantifies the shared genetic variance of common diseasesPreprint
Zhao, Y., Strober, B. J., Hou, K., Kerner, G., Danesh, J., Gazal, S., Cheng, W., Inouye, M., Price, A. L., & Jiang, X. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.10.25329261 · Cited by 2
“First, our results can inform the incorporation of genome-wide priors in polygenic risk scores that leverage pleiotropic diseases/traits 24,39–43 .”
Khunsriraksakul, C., Zhang, F., Wang, L., Chen, S., Markus, H., Chen, D., Shenoy, G., Lopez-Silva, C., Jabboure, F. J., Kesaf, A. E., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.10.06.25336803 · Cited by 2
MacGregor, S., Ni, G., Seviiri, M., Kolovos, A., Le, N., Hassall, M., Schmidt, J. M., Gharahkhani, P., Tang, V., Souzeau, E., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.01.23.26344675 · Cited by 2
Guo, H., & Yu, Z. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9010107 · Cited by 1
“The key idea of MTAG is that, when GWAS results from different traits are correlated, the effect estimates of each trait can be improved by appropriately integrating the information from the GWAS results of other traits [25].”
BackgroundLiu, G., Yan, D., Wang, X., Liu, A., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1391017 · Cited by 1
“Initially, we isolated SNPs associated with BMI or height exhibiting genome-wide significance ( p 5 × 10 − 8 ) (14).”
BackgroundGenetic Predisposition of Different Social Status Indicators in Men and Women
Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2024) · Twin Research and Human Genetics · doi:10.1017/thg.2024.23 · Cited by 1
“…was an out-of-sample predictive power of a PGS greater than 1%; if a multivariate estimate PGS (estimated by multitrait analysis of GWAS [MTAG]; Turley et al., 2018) was provided by the WLS, we used the multivariate PGSs; if no multivariate PGS was provided, we used the univariate PGS…”
Hypometric genetics: Improved power in genetic discovery by incorporating quality control flags
Tanigawa, Y., & Kellis, M. (2024) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.09.008 · Cited by 1
Identification of disease-related genetic variants and imaging factors leveraging summary statistics
Xi, D., Cui, D., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Shang, M., Guo, L., Du, L., & Han, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822054 · Cited by 1
Deciphering the shared genetic architecture between bipolar disorder and body mass index
Ma, H., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, J., & Jin, X. Y. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.002 · Cited by 1
Chen, X., Zhu, Y. X., Zhong, P., & Xie, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2025.1590652 · Cited by 1
“In this analysis, precomputed linkage disequilibrium scores for HapMap3 SNPs, derived from individuals of European ancestry in the 1000 Genomes Project (Bulik-Sullivan et al., 2015), were used.”
InfluentialChen, G., Luo, Q., Wu, C., & Xie, M. (2025) · Clinical Genetics · doi:10.1111/cge.14749 · Cited by 1
“…(MR) was employed to assess causal effects; (4) genetic overlap and shared loci were analyzed with the conditional/conjunctional false discovery rate (cond/conjFDR) analysis [20]; (5) comorbidity risk loci for both conditions were validated via multi-trait analysis of GWASs (MTAG) [21].”
InfluentialGenetic Links Between Subcortical Brain Morphometry and Suicide Attempt Risk in Children and Adults
Ceja, Z., García‐Marín, L. M., Hung, I., Medland, S. E., Edwards, A. C., Rentería, M. E., & Rabinowitz, J. A. (2025) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.70220 · Cited by 1
“Briefly, GWAS meta-analyses were performed using MTAG (Turley et al. 2018) by leveraging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data in up to 74,898 individuals of European ancestry from several international datasets, including the UK Biobank (Elliott et al. 2018) and ABCD (Feldstein Ewing et al. 2018)…”
Uncovering pleiotropic loci in allergic rhinitis and leukocyte traits through multi-trait GWAS
Yang, L., Peng, B., Wu, Y., Ye, W., Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Meng, Z., Wu, Q., Jiang, Y., Li, L., et al. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07100-8 · Cited by 1
Dietary intake and five types of mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
Zhang, Y., Zhang, M.-Z., Guan, Q., Liu, P., Zhang, W., Yang, S., Dong, H., & Hou, H.-F. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07100-y · Cited by 1
“Neuroticism data were from a multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) involving the Genetics of Personality Consortium (GPC), 23andMe, and the UK Biobank (UKB), with 168,105 individuals [21].”
Characterizing aging-related genetic and physiological determinants of spinal curvature
Wang, F. M., Ruby, J. G., Sethi, A., Veras, M. A., Telis, N., & Melamud, E. (2025) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-01003-5 · Cited by 2
“The method for conducting MTAG from GWAS statistics has been previously described 22 .”
Unravelling the genetic architecture of cerebral small vessel disease in the context of stroke
Sathyaseelan, C., Grand, Q. L., Shaoxuan, L. W., Debette, S., & Sargurupremraj, M. (2025) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x251362977 · Cited by 3
“14 This powerful strategy has been particularly effective for ischemic stroke (IS) sub-types, which often suffer from low statistical power due to limited sample sizes.”
Tian, W., Wu, Z., Yang, W. C., Wang, H., & Feng, Q. (2025) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-025-04162-w · Cited by 1
“0.8) [27].”
InfluentialExploiting pleiotropy to enhance variant discovery with functional false discovery rates
Bass, A. J., & Wallace, C. (2025) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-025-00852-3 · Cited by 3
“When applying MTAG to the obesity-related traits, we found that MTAG did not increase the number of discoveries and performed worse than the standard analysis at some sample sizes.”
InfluentialZou, K., Zheng, Y., Ren, X., & Cui, W. (2025) · Journal of Health Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-025-01059-y · Cited by 1
“Recognized as a widely utilized analytical tool, MTAG offers distinct advantages in detecting comorbidity risk loci [21].”
Wang, X., Xia, X., Qiu, K., Shu, T., Pang, W., Ren, J., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-025-02281-3 · Cited by 1
“For metabolism-SNHL trait pairs with significant genetic correlations, we performed sequential cross-trait meta-analyses to identify pleiotropic loci (Turley et al. 2018).”
Dissecting the shared genetic architecture between anxiety and cognitive function
Yang, M., Yu, Z., Wei, Z., Wang, J., Wang, N., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120306 · Cited by 1
Novel Insights Into the Genetic Basis Between Cholelithiasis and Four Dietary Patterns
Zheng, E.-D., Cai, B., & Huang, X. (2025) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.71052 · Cited by 1
“By integrating conjFDR and MTAG as dual validation approaches, several putative shared genetic loci were successfully identified.”
InfluentialHope, S., Lin, A., Rødevand, L. N., Hübenette, S. J., Quintana, D. S., Sønderby, I. E., Cheng, W., Frei, O., Bahrami, S., Hindley, G., et al. (2025) · Psychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1097/ypg.0000000000000406 · Cited by 1
“Using MTAG, a loneliness composite variable was computed using question (1) (perceived feelings of loneliness) as the primary trait and using questions (2) and (3) as related, supporting traits.”
InfluentialSong, N., Xi, X., Zhang, K., Li, Z., Kuan, Y., & Pei, C. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07338-w · Cited by 1
“Model validity was verified through maximum false discovery rate (maxFDR) evaluation to ensure methodological robustness [35].”
Chen, H., Liao, Y., Tang, L., Wei, X., Li, T., & Chen, W. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25509-z · Cited by 2
“…(0.0103), Z = 22.7), Executive Function (h 2 = 0.1214 (0.0061), Z = 19.8), Processing Speed (h 2 = 0.1171 (0.0067), Z = 17.4), Educational Attainment (h 2 = 0.1085 (0.0032), Z = 33.9), Reaction Time (h 2 = 0.0832 (0.0026), Z = 31.8), and Memory Performance (h 2 = 0.0364 (0.0035), Z = 10.4) 59 .”
InfluentialZhu, Z., Shi, L., Li, H., Wang, X., Gao, J., Cheng, L., & Zhang, X. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf633 · Cited by 1
Xu, L., Zheng, W., Hu, J., Lin, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, G., Liu, T., & Zhao, H. (2025) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.11.006 · Cited by 1
Liu, L., Chen, J. W., Chen, T., Li, J., & Wang, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30962-x · Cited by 1
“Multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG), as a diverse sample association analysis, was commonly applied in genomic association studies to detect gene variations associated with specific phenotypes in large-scale samples 15 .”
Cao, X., Zhu, L., Liang, X., Zhang, S., & Sha, Q. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-12239-9 · Cited by 1
“In this study, we perform four most commonly used GWAS summary-based multiple phenotype association tests to identify the association between phenotype in each network module and each of genetic variants, including minP [37], ACAT [38], MTAG [39], and SHom [40] (details in Text S3).”
Fieder, M., & Huber, S. (2026) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.70192 · Cited by 1
Wang, T., Miao, X., & Xia, Y. (2026) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1155/genr/1063531 · Cited by 1
Causal evidence linking chronic pain genetics to late-onset asthma via the nervous system
Kolifarhood, G., Parisien, M., Fillingim, M., Chen, C. X., Yiran, C., Dimitrov, N., Zidan, M., Hanumunthadu, L., Her, P. H., Bhatnagar, S., et al. (2026) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2025.11.020 · Cited by 1
“MTAG-enhanced sum-mary statistics were then used to refine gene prioritisation 33 (Supplementary Methods).”
Isolating the Genetic Component of Mania in Bipolar Disorder
Merola, G. P., Zvrskovec, J., Wang, R., Li, Y. K., Castellini, G., Ricca, V., Coleman, J., Vassos, E., & Breen, G. D. (2026) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.11.008 · Cited by 5
Meena, D., Pansini, M., Fichera, A., Huang, J., Ahmed, A., Dehghan, A., Banerjee, R., & Yaghootkar, H. (2026) · Human Genomics · doi:10.1186/s40246-026-00913-2 · Cited by 3
“MTAG is a generalised meta-analytic framework that leverages the shared genetic architecture across traits to boost power for identifying trait-specific associations, while accounting for sample overlap and incomplete genetic correlation [46].”
Leveraging pleiotropy to improve genetic risk prediction across diseases
Hu, J., Zhou, G., Zhao, H., & DeWan, A. T. (2026) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.gim.2026.102548 · Cited by 2
Wu, P., Maimaiti, A., Ma, Z., Abulizi, A., Yang, W., Yin, S., Wang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x261426920 · Cited by 1
“First, we utilized the MTAG software with the -equal_h2 option to perform a meta-analysis, termed IA FinnGen, to address sample overlap, 21 considering the high genetic correlation between SAH and UIA ( [ r g = ± 0 970 0 133 .”
InfluentialDeep learning and statistical methods identify novel asthma risk variants in Europeans
Chen, E., Jiang, Y., Meng, Z., Song, Y., Wang, X., Wu, Q., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Glessner, J., Song, X., et al. (2026) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2026.03.016 · Cited by 1
Song, Y., Jiang, Y., Tian, H., Glessner, J., Hakonarson, H. H., & Chang, X. (2026) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-026-03591-7 · Cited by 3
Zhu, Z., Li, H., Wang, X., Chen, X., & Cheng, L. (2026) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1155/humu/9992644 · Cited by 1
“MTAG, which involves a joint association analysis of genetically correlated traits, has demonstrated utility in boosting statistical power for detecting novel susceptibility variants relative to conducting separate GWAS for the individual traits tested [14].”
Metadata
- Authors
- 23andMe Research Team, Turley, P., Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Walters, R. K., Maghzian, O., Okbay, A., Lee, J. J., Fontana, M. A., Nguyen-Viet, T. A., Wedow, R., Zacher, M., Furlotte, N. A., Magnusson, P., Oskarsson, S., Johannesson, M., Visscher, P. M., Laibson, D., Cesarini, D., Neale, B. M., & Benjamin, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- 23andMe (United States) (US)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Turley, Patrick
- Cesarini, David
- Neale, Benjamin M.
- Benjamin, Daniel J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-237
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC5805593
- OpenAlex
- W2780560743
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 37
- FWCI
- 38.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1144083)
- University of Southern California
- Wellcome Trust (213422/Z/18/Z)
- Broad Institute
- Vetenskapsrådet (421-2013-1061)
- National Institutes of Health (MH107649)
- Medical Research Council (MR/N01104X/1, MR/N01104X/2)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S008349/1)
- National Institute on Aging (T32AG000186, AG005842, R01AG042568, P01AG005842, P30AG012810, P30AG034532)
- National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH109539, R01MH107649, R01MH101244)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD031921, R01HD073342, R01HD060726)
- H2020 European Research Council (647648)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- multi-trait analysis, MTAG, genome-wide association summary statistics, depressive symptoms, neuroticism, subjective well-being, polygenic risk score, genetic loci, personality traits, overlapping samples
- MeSH terms
- Neuroticism, Algorithms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Depression, Health, Humans, Phenotype, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Association Studies, Diagnostic Self Evaluation, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review