The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants
Open accessAbstract
Plants intimately associate with diverse bacteria. Plant-associated bacteria have ostensibly evolved genes that enable them to adapt to plant environments. However, the identities of such genes are mostly unknown, and their functions are poorly characterized. We sequenced 484 genomes of bacterial isolates from roots of Brassicaceae, poplar, and maize. We then compared 3,837 bacterial genomes to identify thousands of plant-associated gene clusters. Genomes of plant-associated bacteria encode more carbohydrate metabolism functions and fewer mobile elements than related non-plant-associated genomes do. We experimentally validated candidates from two sets of plant-associated genes: one involved in plant colonization, and the other serving in microbe–microbe competition between plant-associated bacteria. We also identified 64 plant-associated protein domains that potentially mimic plant domains; some are shared with plant-associated fungi and oomycetes. This work expands the genome-based understanding of plant–microbe interactions and provides potential leads for efficient and sustainable agriculture through microbiome engineering. Comparative genomic analysis of 3,837 bacterial genomes, including new sequences from 484 root-associated isolates, identifies plant-associated gene clusters and plant-mimicking domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform
Katoh, K. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkf436 · Cited by 17,027
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496
KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1070 · Cited by 7,387
Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes
Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Lozupone, C., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ramey, R. R., Bircher, J. S., Schlegel, M. L., Tucker, T. A., Schrenzel, M. D., Knight, R., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155725 · Cited by 3,747
Self-citationEmms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2015) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2 · Cited by 3,408
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Microbiota and Host Nutrition across Plant and Animal Kingdoms
Hacquard, S., Garrido-Oter, R., González, A., Spaepen, S., Ackermann, G., Lebeis, S., McHardy, A. C., Dangl, J. L., Knight, R., Ley, R., et al. (2015) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.009 · Cited by 779
Self-citation
Cited by
A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data
Liu, Y.-X., Qin, Y., Chen, T., Lu, M., Qian, X., Guo, X., & Bai, Y. (2021) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-020-00724-8 · Cited by 864
Jiao, S., Chen, W., Wang, J., Du, N., Li, Q., & Wei, G. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0526-0 · Cited by 759
Microbiome-Mediated Stress Resistance in Plants
Liu, H., Brettell, L. E., Qiu, Z., & Singh, B. K. (2020) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2020.03.014 · Cited by 731
A single bacterial genus maintains root growth in a complex microbiome
Finkel, O. M., Salas-González, I., Castrillo, G., Conway, J. M., Law, T. F., Teixeira, P. J. P. L., Wilson, E. D., Fitzpatrick, C. R., Jones, C. D., & Dangl, J. L. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2778-7 · Cited by 517
Self-citationAntibiotic Resistomes in Plant Microbiomes
Chen, Q.-L., Cui, H.-L., Su, J.-Q., Penuelas, J., & Zhu, Y.-G. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.010 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, A., Salas Gonzalez, I., Mittelviefhaus, M., Clingenpeel, S., Herrera Paredes, S., Miao, J., Wang, K., Devescovi, G., Stillman, K., Monteiro, F., Rangel Alvarez, B., Lundberg, D. S., Lu, T.-Y., Lebeis, S., Jin, Z., McDonald, M., Klein, A. P., Feltcher, M. E., Rio, T. G., Grant, S. R., Doty, S. L., Ley, R. E., Zhao, B., Venturi, V., Pelletier, D. A., Vorholt, J. A., Tringe, S. G., Woyke, T., & Dangl, J. L.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2017-12-18
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-150
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2774168073
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 40.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-017-0012-9
- The paper
- Levy, A., Salas Gonzalez, I., Mittelviefhaus, M., Clingenpeel, S., Herrera Paredes, S., Miao, J., Wang, K., Devescovi, G., Stillman, K., Monteiro, F., Rangel Alvarez, B., Lundberg, D. S., Lu, T.-Y., Lebeis, S., Jin, Z., McDonald, M., Klein, A. P., Feltcher, M. E., Rio, T. G., . . . Dangl, J. L. (2018). Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-017-0012-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
