Cited by 292Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetics and Plant BreedingGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions

Open access
Millet, Emilie J., Kruijer, Willem, Coupel-Ledru, Aude, Alvarez Prado, Santiago, Cabrera-Bosquet, Llorenç, Lacube, Sébastien, Charcosset, Alain, Welcker, Claude +2 more·2019·Nature Genetics

Abstract

The development of germplasm adapted to changing climate is required to ensure food security 1,2. Genomic prediction is a powerful tool to evaluate many genotypes but performs poorly in contrasting environmental scenarios 3-7 (genotype × environment interaction), in spite of promising results for flowering time 8. New avenues are opened by the development of sensor networks for environmental characterization in thousands of fields 9,10. We present a new strategy for germplasm evaluation under genotype × environment interaction. Yield was dissected in grain weight and number and genotype × environment interaction in these components was modeled as genotypic sensitivity to environmental drivers. Environments were characterized using genotype-specific indices computed from sensor data in each field and the progression of phenology calibrated for each genotype on a phenotyping platform. A whole-genome regression approach for the genotypic sensitivities led to accurate prediction of yield under genotype × environment interaction in a wide range of environmental scenarios, outperforming a benchmark approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0414-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weather stations now collect high-resolution longitudinal data on environmental covariables such as temperature, soil water potential, humidity, and solar radiation for every environment within a multi-environment trial breeding program.

    “Weather stations now collect high-resolution longitudinal data on environmental covariables such as temperature, soil water potential, humidity, and solar radiation for every environment within an MET breeding program (Millet et al. , 2019).”

    From REML implementations of kernel-based genomic prediction models for genotype x environment x management interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Millet et al. , 2019

    The available indexed passages contain bibliographic information and a dataset listing, but no discussion of weather-station measurements. Searches for weather stations, soil water potential, temperature, humidity, solar radiation, and longitudinal environmental data found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Not all covariables and timeframes in the growth cycle are relevant.

    “We did not perform any feature selection, but it is well known that not all covariables and timeframes in the growth cycle are relevant (Millet et al. , 2019).”

    From REML implementations of kernel-based genomic prediction models for genotype x environment x management interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Millet et al. , 2019

    The available passages are bibliographic information and a dataset listing (Abstract and “2 Finished”; no page given), not a discussion of which covariables or growth-cycle periods matter. Searches for feature selection, environmental variables, and growth stages found no passage in our copy that addresses the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millet, E. J., Kruijer, W., Coupel-Ledru, A., Alvarez Prado, S., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Lacube, S., Charcosset, A., Welcker, C., van Eeuwijk, F., & Tardieu, F.
Affiliations
  • Institut Agro Montpellier (FR)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Tardieu, François
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
952-956
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2945720445
Cited by
280
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 4
FWCI
19.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-INBS-0012)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
maize, grain yield prediction, gene-environment interaction, environmental drivers, sensor networks, phenotyping platforms, germplasm evaluation, climate change adaptation
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Environment, Europe, Geography, Phenotype, Genome, Plant, Genomics, Genetic Association Studies, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review