Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resequencing of 414 cultivated and wild watermelon accessions identifies selection for fruit quality traits

Open access
Guo, Shaogui, Zhao, Shengjie, Sun, Honghe, Wang, Xin, Wu, Shan, Lin, Tao, Ren, Yi, Gao, Lei, Deng, Yun, Zhang, Jie, Lu, Xuqiang, Zhang, Haiying, Shang, Jianli, Gong, Guoyi, Wen, Changlong, He, Nan, Tian, Shouwei, Li, Maoying, Liu, Junpu, Wang, Yanping, Zhu, Yingchun, Jarret, Robert, Levi, Amnon, Zhang, Xingping, Huang, Sanwen, Fei, Zhangjun, Liu, Wenge, Xu, Yong·2019·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Fruit characteristics of sweet watermelon are largely the result of human selection. Here we report an improved watermelon reference genome and whole-genome resequencing of 414 accessions representing all extant species in the Citrullus genus. Population genomic analyses reveal the evolutionary history of Citrullus, suggesting independent evolutions in Citrullus amarus and the lineage containing Citrullus lanatus and Citrullus mucosospermus. Our findings indicate that different loci affecting watermelon fruit size have been under selection during speciation, domestication and improvement. A non-bitter allele, arising in the progenitor of sweet watermelon, is largely fixed in C. lanatus. Selection for flesh sweetness started in the progenitor of C. lanatus and continues through modern breeding on loci controlling raffinose catabolism and sugar transport. Fruit flesh coloration and sugar accumulation might have co-evolved through shared genetic components including a sugar transporter gene. This study provides valuable genomic resources and sheds light on watermelon speciation and breeding history.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0518-4

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Metadata

Authors
Guo, S., Zhao, S., Sun, H., Wang, X., Wu, S., Lin, T., Ren, Y., Gao, L., Deng, Y., Zhang, J., Lu, X., Zhang, H., Shang, J., Gong, G., Wen, C., He, N., Tian, S., Li, M., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Jarret, R., Levi, A., Zhang, X., Huang, S., Fei, Z., Liu, W., & Xu, Y.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-11
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1616-1623
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2986820495
Cited by
363
References
66
FWCI
29.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resequencing of 414 cultivated and wild watermelon accessions identifies selection for fruit quality traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-019-0518-4
The paper
Guo, S., Zhao, S., Sun, H., Wang, X., Wu, S., Lin, T., Ren, Y., Gao, L., Deng, Y., Zhang, J., Lu, X., Zhang, H., Shang, J., Gong, G., Wen, C., He, N., Tian, S., Li, M., Liu, J., . . . Xu, Y. (2019). Resequencing of 414 cultivated and wild watermelon accessions identifies selection for fruit quality traits. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0518-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.