Cited by 0Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The landscape of gene loss and missense variation across the mammalian tree informs on gene essentiality

Open access
Liao, Calwing, Ye, Robert, Ivankovic, Franjo, Fu, Jack M., Walters, Raymond, Lowther, Chelsea, Valkanas, Elise, Churchhouse, Claire +6 more·2026·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Patterns of gene and sequence preservation across species provide insight into gene essentiality under natural selection. Here we developed two interspecies constraint metrics across 462 mammalian species: Gene Identity Score of Mammalian Orthologs (GISMO), which quantifies gene loss weighted by evolutionary distance to humans, and GISMO-mis, which measures missense constraint using the ratio of missense to synonymous variation across mammals. Both metrics are strongly correlated with human loss of function, missense and dosage constraint derived from large-scale sequencing studies, yet are largely independent of coding sequence length. GISMO and GISMO-mis identify essential genes missed by existing human-only metrics, particularly short genes. Genes in the most constrained deciles are enriched for rare variant associations in disorders linked to reduced fecundity, including schizophrenia, autism and neurodevelopmental disorders, and show strong enrichment for common variant heritability. These deciles also exhibit reduced copy number variation, consistent with dosage sensitivity. In addition, GISMO improves prioritization of recessive disease genes and captures signatures of homozygous selection across the mammalian tree. Taken together, GISMO and GISMO-mis leverage deep mammalian evolution to provide complementary, length-robust measures of gene essentiality that strengthen disease–gene prioritization and illuminate the selective forces shaping human biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-026-02783-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liao, C., Ye, R., Ivankovic, F., Fu, J. M., Walters, R., Lowther, C., Valkanas, E., Churchhouse, C., Samocha, K. E., Lindblad-Toh, K., Karlsson, E., Hiller, M., Talkowski, M. E., & Neale, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Liao, Calwing
  • Neale, Benjamin M.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2026-10-20
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W7223046854
Cited by
0
References
4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH101244)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U24HG011450)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
gene essentiality, gene loss, mammalian evolution, dosage sensitivity, copy number variation, rare variant association, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, neurodevelopmental disorders, disease gene prioritization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review