Cited by 327Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Designing microbial consortia with defined social interactions

Open access
Kong, Wentao, Meldgin, David R., Collins, James J., Lu, Ting·2018·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

Designer microbial consortia are an emerging frontier in synthetic biology that enable versatile microbiome engineering. However, the utilization of such consortia is hindered by our limited capacity in rapidly creating ecosystems with desired dynamics. Here we present the development of synthetic communities through social interaction engineering that combines modular pathway reconfiguration with model creation. Specifically, we created six two-strain consortia, each possessing a unique mode of interaction, including commensalism, amensalism, neutralism, cooperation, competition and predation. These consortia follow distinct population dynamics with characteristics determined by the underlying interaction modes. We showed that models derived from two-strain consortia can be used to design three- and four-strain ecosystems with predictable behaviors and further extended to provide insights into community dynamics in space. This work sheds light on the organization of interacting microbial species and provides a systematic framework-social interaction programming-to guide the development of synthetic ecosystems for diverse purposes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41589-018-0091-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Weber, W., Daoud-El Baba, M. & Fussenegger, M. Synthetic ecosystems based on airborne inter-and intrakingdom communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10435-10440 (2007).
  2. Balagaddé, F.K. et al. A synthetic Escherichia coli predator-prey ecosystem. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 187 (2008).
  3. Gore, J., Youk, H. & Van Oudenaarden, A. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature 459, 253 (2009).
  4. Mee, M.T., Collins, J.J., Church, G.M. & Wang, H.H. Syntrophic exchange in synthetic microbial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2149-E2156 (2014).
  5. Wintermute, E.H. & Silver, P.A. Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 407 (2010).
  6. Minty, J.J. et al. Design and characterization of synthetic fungal-bacterial consortia for direct production of isobutanol from cellulosic biomass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14592-14597 (2013).
  7. Shou, W., Ram, S. & Vilar, J.M. Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1877-1882 (2007).
  8. Brenner, K., Karig, D.K., Weiss, R. & Arnold, F.H. Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17300-17304 (2007).
  9. Foster, K.R. Social behaviour in microorganisms. in Social Behaviour: Genes, Ecology and Evolution 331-356 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  10. Xavier, J.B. Social interaction in synthetic and natural microbial communities. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 483 (2011).
  11. Kong, W., Kapuganti, V.S. & Lu, T. A gene network engineering platform for lactic acid bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e37 (2016).
  12. Oh, J.-H. & van Pijkeren, J.-P. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e131 (2014).

Cited by

Authors
Kong, W., Meldgin, D. R., Collins, J. J., & Lu, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Collins, James J.
  • Lu, Ting
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2018-06-25
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
821-829
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W2809425738
Cited by
327
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
addendum (2024-04-22)
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1553649, 1227034)
  • American Heart Association
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
synthetic microbial consortia, microbial community dynamics, commensalism, amensalism, neutralism, cooperation, competition (biology), predation, synthetic ecosystem
MeSH terms
Lactococcus lactis, Microbial Interactions, Synthetic Biology, Microbial Consortia, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review