Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted glycan degradation potentiates the anticancer immune response in vivo

Open access
Gray, Melissa A., Stanczak, Michal A., Mantuano, Natália R., Xiao, Han, Pijnenborg, Johan F. A., Malaker, Stacy A., Miller, Caitlyn L., Weidenbacher, Payton A., Tanzo, Julia T., Ahn, Green, Woods, Elliot C., Läubli, Heinz, Bertozzi, Carolyn R.·2020·Nature Chemical Biology

Abstract

Currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting the PD-1 and CTLA-4 receptor pathways are powerful treatment options for certain cancers; however, most patients across cancer types still fail to respond. Consequently, there is interest in discovering and blocking alternative pathways that mediate immune suppression. One such mechanism is an upregulation of sialoglycans in malignancy, which has been recently shown to inhibit immune cell activation through multiple mechanisms and therefore represents a targetable glycoimmune checkpoint. Since these glycans are not canonically druggable, we designed an αHER2 antibody–sialidase conjugate that potently and selectively strips diverse sialoglycans from breast cancer cells. In syngeneic breast cancer models, desialylation enhanced immune cell infiltration and activation and prolonged the survival of mice, an effect that was dependent on expression of the Siglec-E checkpoint receptor found on tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells. Thus, antibody–sialidase conjugates represent a promising modality for glycoimmune checkpoint therapy. An αHER2 antibody–neuraminidase conjugate, which selectively targets the removal of sialic acids from glycans on breast cancer cells, bypasses a glycoimmune checkpoint and enhances tumor cell killing by the host immune system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41589-020-0622-x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Gray, M. A., Stanczak, M. A., Mantuano, N. R., Xiao, H., Pijnenborg, J. F. A., Malaker, S. A., Miller, C. L., Weidenbacher, P. A., Tanzo, J. T., Ahn, G., Woods, E. C., Läubli, H., & Bertozzi, C. R.
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2020-08-17
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
1376-1384
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W3048973619
Cited by
362
References
4
FWCI
12.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted glycan degradation potentiates the anticancer immune response in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41589-020-0622-x
The paper
Gray, M. A., Stanczak, M. A., Mantuano, N. R., Xiao, H., Pijnenborg, J. F. A., Malaker, S. A., Miller, C. L., Weidenbacher, P. A., Tanzo, J. T., Ahn, G., Woods, E. C., Läubli, H., & Bertozzi, C. R. (2020). Targeted glycan degradation potentiates the anticancer immune response in vivo. Nature Chemical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-020-0622-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.