Cited by 3Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

A genetically encoded selection for amyloid-β oligomer binders

Open access
Lee, ByungUk, Mannone, John A., Wang, Tina·2025·Nature Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Soluble amyloid-β oligomers (AβOs) are a hypothesized source of neurotoxicity in Alzheimer disease. Binding proteins that recognize these species may have high utility in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. However, identifying binders to AβOs directly generated from the aggregation cascade is challenging because of the short lifetime and low concentrations of oligomer populations. We report a strategy to detect binding to AβOs formed during Aβ42 aggregation using a genetically encoded biosensor. We show that our method enables rapid, highly reproducible measurement of the activity of existing AβO binders and can be used to select for new binders with improved potency. We uncover hits that are >20-fold more effective than reported binders at delaying secondary nucleation, the step in Aβ aggregation thought to generate the highest number of toxic oligomers. Our approach may greatly accelerate the discovery and characterization of binding proteins that target AβOs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41589-025-01975-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lee, B., Mannone, J. A., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Tina
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Published
2025-07-15
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1885-1894
ISSN
  • 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4469
OpenAlex
W4412420997
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health (R21AG088715, R01 GM 061238, R35 GM151985)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC21K0065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyloid-beta oligomers, genetically encoded biosensors, binder selection, secondary nucleation, Alzheimer's disease, protein aggregation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Protein Binding, Biosensing Techniques, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review