Cited by 102Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Large language models should be used as scientific reasoning engines, not knowledge databases

Truhn, Daniel, Reis-Filho, Jorge S., Kather, Jakob Nikolas·2023·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02594-z

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truhn, D., Reis-Filho, J. S., & Kather, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Kather, Jakob Nikolas
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-10-18
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2983-2984
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4387744047
Cited by
102
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, scientific reasoning, knowledge base, genetic testing
MeSH terms
Data Management, Language, Problem Solving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review