Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 643

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH

Open access
Codeluppi, Simone, Borm, Lars E., Zeisel, Amit, La Manno, Gioele, van Lunteren, Josina A., Svensson, Camilla I., Linnarsson, Sten·2018·Nature Methods

Abstract

Global efforts to create a molecular census of the brain using single-cell transcriptomics are producing a large catalog of molecularly defined cell types. However, spatial information is lacking and new methods are needed to map a large number of cell type–specific markers simultaneously on large tissue areas. Here, we describe a cyclic single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization methodology and define the cellular organization of the somatosensory cortex. osmFISH applies automated cycles of single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization without barcoding to provide spatial gene expression in tissue sections at high sensitivity, accuracy and throughput.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-018-0175-z

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Lee, J. H. et al. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Lee, J. H. et al. Nat. Protoc. 10, 442–458 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lubeck, E. & Cai, L. Nat. Methods 9, 743–748 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Shah, S., Lubeck, E., Zhou, W. & Cai, L. Neuron 92, 342–357 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lyubimova, A. et al. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1743–1758 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Itzkovitz, S. et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 106–114 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Codeluppi, S. et al. protocols.io, https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.psednbe (2018). · doi:10.17504/protocols.io.psednbe
  8. Maddox, P. H. & Jenkins, D. J. Clin. Pathol. 40, 1256–1257 (1987). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Preibisch, S., Saalfeld, S. & Tomancak, P. Bioinformatics 25, 1463–1465 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pedregosa, F. et al. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2012).
  11. Van Der Maaten, L. J. P. & Hinton, G. E. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
  12. Ripley, B. D. J. Appl. Probab. 13, 255–266 (1976). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Rocklin, M. in Proc. 14th Python in Science Conference (eds. Huff, K. & Bergstra, J.) 130–136 (2015).
  14. Collette, A. Python and HDF5 (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, 2013).
  15. Dalcín, L., Paz, R. & Storti, M. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 65, 1108–1115 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Van Der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C. & Varoquaux, G. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 22–30 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  17. McKinney, W. in Proc. 9th Python in Science Conference (eds. van der Walt, S. & Millman, J.) 51–56 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  18. van der Walt, S. et al. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014). · doi:10.7717/peerj.453
  19. Meurer, A. et al. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e103 (2017). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 643

Metadata

Authors
Codeluppi, S., Borm, L. E., Zeisel, A., La Manno, G., van Lunteren, J. A., Svensson, C. I., & Linnarsson, S.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2018-10-30
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
932-935
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2952383043
Cited by
643
References
14
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41592-018-0175-z
The paper
Codeluppi, S., Borm, L. E., Zeisel, A., La Manno, G., van Lunteren, J. A., Svensson, C. I., & Linnarsson, S. (2018). Spatial organization of the somatosensory cortex revealed by osmFISH. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0175-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.