Cited by 145Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Evaluating measures of association for single-cell transcriptomics

Skinnider, Michael A., Squair, Jordan W., Foster, Leonard J.·2019·Nature Methods

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics provides an opportunity to characterize cell-type-specific transcriptional networks, intercellular signaling pathways and cellular diversity with unprecedented resolution by profiling thousands of cells in a single experiment. However, owing to the unique statistical properties of scRNA-seq data, the optimal measures of association for identifying gene-gene and cell-cell relationships from single-cell transcriptomics remain unclear. Here, we conducted a large-scale evaluation of 17 measures of association for their ability to reconstruct cellular networks, cluster cells of the same type and link cell-type-specific transcriptional programs to disease. Measures of proportionality were consistently among the best-performing methods across datasets and tasks. Our analysis provides data-driven guidance for gene and cell network analysis in single-cell transcriptomics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-019-0372-4

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • hdWGCNA co-expression networks have a similar level of functional coherence to a previous study that evaluated co-expression networks derived from scRNA-seq data with different measures of gene-gene association.

    “We report a similar level of functional coherence in these co-expression networks to a previous study that evaluated co-expression networks derived from scRNA-seq data with different measures of gene-gene association.24”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skinnider, M. A., Squair, J. W., & Foster, L. J.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Skinnider, Michael A.
  • Foster, Leonard J.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
381-386
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2929810236
Cited by
145
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 10
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Genome Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
association measures, single-cell transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, gene-gene association, gene regulatory networks, cell clustering, disease association, network inference
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cell Line, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review