Cited by 66Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Automatic cell type identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing

Open access
Xie, Bingbing, Jiang, Qin, Mora, Antonio, Li, Xuri·2021·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has become a powerful tool for scientists of many research disciplines due to its ability to elucidate the heterogeneous and complex cell-type compositions of different tissues and cell populations. Traditional cell-type identification methods for scRNA-seq data analysis are time-consuming and knowledge-dependent for manual annotation. By contrast, automatic cell-type identification methods may have the advantages of being fast, accurate, and more user friendly. Here, we discuss and evaluate thirty-two published automatic methods for scRNA-seq data analysis in terms of their prediction accuracy, F1-score, unlabeling rate and running time. We highlight the advantages and disadvantages of these methods and provide recommendations of method choice depending on the available information. The challenges and future applications of these automatic methods are further discussed. In addition, we provide a free scRNA-seq data analysis package encompassing the discussed automatic methods to help the easy usage of them in real-world applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.027

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many unsupervised scRNA-seq clustering methods have been proposed, which are followed by time-consuming and labor-costly annotations.

    “Many unsupervised scRNA-seq clustering methods have been proposed2–4, which are followed by time-consuming and labor-costly annotations5.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, B., Jiang, Q., Mora, A., & Li, X.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jiang, Qin
  • Mora, Antonio
  • Li, Xuri
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2021-01
Volume
19
Pages
5874-5887
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3208953781
Cited by
66
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070983)
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, cell type annotation, unsupervised clustering, method comparison, prediction accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review