Cited by 58Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Deep embedding and alignment of protein sequences

Open access
Llinares-López, Felipe, Berthet, Quentin, Blondel, Mathieu, Teboul, Olivier, Vert, Jean-Philippe·2023·Nature Methods

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Protein sequence alignment is a key component of most bioinformatics pipelines to study the structures and functions of proteins. Aligning highly divergent sequences remains, however, a difficult task that current algorithms often fail to perform accurately, leaving many proteins or open reading frames poorly annotated. Here, we leverage recent advances in deep learning for language modelling and differentiable programming to propose DEDAL, a flexible model to align protein sequences and detect homologs. DEDAL is a machine learning-based model that learns to align sequences by observing large datasets of raw protein sequences and of correct alignments. Once trained, we show that DEDAL improves by up to two- or three-fold the alignment correctness over existing methods on remote homologs, and better discriminates remote homologs from evolutionarily unrelated sequences, paving the way to improvements on many downstream tasks relying on sequence alignment in structural and functional genomics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-022-01700-2

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Llinares-López, F., Berthet, Q., Blondel, M., Teboul, O., & Vert, J.-P.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Vert, Jean-Philippe
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2022-12-15
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
104-111
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W4311661986
Cited by
58
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein sequence alignment, deep learning, differentiable programming, homology detection, divergent sequences, protein structure annotation, open reading frames
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review