Cited by 222Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Scalable telomere-to-telomere assembly for diploid and polyploid genomes with double graph

Open access
Cheng, Haoyu, Asri, Mobin, Lucas, Julian, Koren, Sergey, Li, Heng·2024·Nature Methods

Abstract

Despite advances in long-read sequencing technologies, constructing a near telomere-to-telomere assembly is still computationally demanding. Here we present hifiasm (UL), an efficient de novo assembly algorithm combining multiple sequencing technologies to scale up population-wide near telomere-to-telomere assemblies. Applied to 22 human and two plant genomes, our algorithm produces better diploid assemblies at a cost of an order of magnitude lower than existing methods, and it also works with polyploid genomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-024-02269-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These technological advancements led to a new generation of genome alignment and assembly algorithms leveraging new data types.

    “These technological advancements also led to a new generation of genome alignment and assembly algorithms leveraging the new data types (84–89).”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Cheng H, Concepcion GT, Feng X, Zhang H. & Li H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170-175 (2021). [PubMed: 33526886]
  2. Nurk S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res 30, 1291-1305 (2020). [PubMed: 32801147]
  3. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y. & Pevzner PA Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540-546 (2019). [PubMed: 30936562]
  4. Luo X, Kang X. & Schönhuth A. phasebook: haplotype-aware de novo assembly of diploid genomes from long reads. Genome Biol 22, 299 (2021). [PubMed: 34706745]
  5. Rautiainen M. et al. Telomere-to-telomere assembly of diploid chromosomes with Verkko. Nat. Biotechnol. 1-9 (2023). [PubMed: 36653493]
  6. Bankevich A, Bzikadze AV, Kolmogorov M, Antipov D. & Pevzner PA Multiplex de bruijn graphs enable genome assembly from long, high-fidelity reads. Nat Biotechnol 40, 1075-1081 (2022). [PubMed: 35228706]
  7. Lorig-Roach R. et al. Phased nanopore assembly with Shasta and modular graph phasing with GFAse. bioRxiv 2023-02 (2023).
  8. Bao Z. et al. Genome architecture and tetrasomic inheritance of autotetraploid potato. Mol. Plant 15, 1211-1226 (2022). [PubMed: 35733345]
  9. Cheng H. et al. Haplotype-resolved assembly of diploid genomes without parental data. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1332-1335 (2022). [PubMed: 35332338]
  10. Edge P, Bafna V. & Bansal V. HapCUT2: robust and accurate haplotype assembly for diverse sequencing technologies. Genome Res 27, 801-812 (2017). [PubMed: 27940952]
  11. Martin M. et al. WhatsHap: fast and accurate read-based phasing. bioRxiv (2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, H., Asri, M., Lucas, J., Koren, S., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Heng
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2024-05-10
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
967-970
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W4396803203
Cited by
222
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 1
FWCI
28.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01HG010040, U01HG010971, U41HG010972, K99HG012798)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
telomere-to-telomere genome assembly, de novo genome assembly, Hifiasm, double graphs, polyploid genomes, diploid genome, long-read sequencing, PacBio HiFi, hybrid assembly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review