Sliding Window Interaction Grammar (SWING): a generalized interaction language model for peptide and protein interactions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The explosion of sequence data has allowed the rapid growth of protein language models (pLMs). pLMs have now been employed in many frameworks including variant-effect and peptide-specificity prediction. Traditionally, for protein-protein or peptide-protein interactions (PPIs), corresponding sequences are either co-embedded followed by post-hoc integration or the sequences are concatenated prior to embedding. Interestingly, no method utilizes a language representation of the interaction itself. We developed an interaction LM (iLM), which uses a novel language to represent interactions between protein/peptide sequences. Sliding Window Interaction Grammar (SWING) leverages differences in amino acid properties to generate an interaction vocabulary. This vocabulary is the input into a LM followed by a supervised prediction step where the LM's representations are used as features. SWING was first applied to predicting peptide:MHC (pMHC) interactions. SWING was not only successful at generating Class I and Class II models that have comparable prediction to state-of-the-art approaches, but the unique Mixed Class model was also successful at jointly predicting both classes. Further, the SWING model trained only on Class I alleles was predictive for Class II, a complex prediction task not attempted by any existing approach. For de novo data, using only Class I or Class II data, SWING also accurately predicted Class II pMHC interactions in murine models of SLE (MRL/lpr model) and T1D (NOD model), that were validated experimentally. To further evaluate SWING's generalizability, we tested its ability to predict the disruption of specific protein-protein interactions by missense mutations. Although modern methods like AlphaMissense and ESM1b can predict interfaces and variant effects/pathogenicity per mutation, they are unable to predict interaction-specific disruptions. SWING was successful at accurately predicting the impact of both Mendelian mutations and population variants on PPIs. This is the first generalizable approach that can accurately predict interaction-specific disruptions by missense mutations with only sequence information. Overall, SWING is a first-in-class generalizable zero-shot iLM that learns the language of PPIs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · see citing works
Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning
Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., & Pereira, F. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '06 · doi:10.3115/1610075.1610094 · Cited by 1,543 · see citing works
Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology
Theodoris, C. V., Xiao, L., Chopra, A., Chaffin, M. D., Al Sayed, Z. R., Hill, M. C., Mantineo, H., Brydon, E. M., Zeng, Z., Liu, X. S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06139-9 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Protein language models (pLMs) have been used for engineering synthetic protein sequences that function like natural proteins 4,5 and in niche contexts of predicting antibody evolution to better understand the immune repertoire 6 .”
Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data
Frazer, J., Notin, P., Dias, M., Gomez, A., Min, J. K., Brock, K., Gal, Y., & Marks, D. S. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8 · Cited by 791 · see citing works
Widespread macromolecular interaction perturbations in human genetic disorders
Sahni, N., Yi, S., Taipale, M., Fuxman Bass, J. I., Coulombe-Huntington, J., Yang, F., Peng, J., Weile, J., Karras, G. I., Wang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.013 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Stereoselective amino acid synthesis by synergistic photoredox-pyridoxal radical biocatalysis
Cheng, L., Li, D., Mai, B. K., Bo, Z., Cheng, L., Liu, P., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg2420 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Ma, J., Fong, S. H., Luo, Y., Bakkenist, C. J., Shen, J. P., Mourragui, S., Wessels, L. F. A., Hafner, M., Sharan, R., Peng, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-00169-2 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Siwek, J. C., Omelchenko, A. A., Chhibbar, P., Arshad, S., Rosengart, A., Nazarali, I., Patel, A., Nazarali, K., Rahimikollu, J., Tilstra, J. S., Shlomchik, M. J., Koes, D. R., Joglekar, A. V., & Das, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Joglekar, Alok V.
- Das, Jishnu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2025-07-28
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1707-1719
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- PMC
- PMC12328204
- OpenAlex
- W4412692505
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP2AI164325)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG012041)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- protein-protein interaction, peptide-MHC interaction, MHC class I, MHC class II, amino acid properties, zero-shot prediction, protein language models, systemic lupus erythematosus, type 1 diabetes, risk alleles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review