Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology
Open accessAbstract
Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues. Recently, transfer learning has revolutionized fields such as natural language understanding 1,2 and computer vision 3 by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards a vast array of downstream tasks with limited task-specific data. Here, we developed a context-aware, attention-based deep learning model, Geneformer, pretrained on a large-scale corpus of about 30 million single-cell transcriptomes to enable context-specific predictions in settings with limited data in network biology. During pretraining, Geneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the attention weights of the model in a completely self-supervised manner. Fine-tuning towards a diverse panel of downstream tasks relevant to chromatin and network dynamics using limited task-specific data demonstrated that Geneformer consistently boosted predictive accuracy. Applied to disease modelling with limited patient data, Geneformer identified candidate therapeutic targets for cardiomyopathy. Overall, Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model from which fine-tuning towards a broad range of downstream applications can be pursued to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
51 of 63 cited sources checked · 31 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Genes known to be highly context-dependent, such as NOTCH receptors, showed more variability in their embeddings across variable cell types compared to the known housekeeping gene GAPDH.
“Furthermore, genes known to be highly context-dependent, such as NOTCH receptors, showed more variability in their embeddings across variable cell types14 compared to the known housekeeping gene GAPDH (Extended Data Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source
The Results sections describe cell-type-specific gene expression in human aortic tissue, but the passages found do not discuss NOTCH receptors as context-dependent genes. Searches for NOTCH, GAPDH, and embedding variability found no passage addressing the cited point. The embedding comparison is attributed to the citing paper’s Extended Data Fig. 3, not clearly to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mapping the gene regulatory networks that drive disease progression enables screening for molecules that correct the network by normalizing core regulatory elements, rather than targeting peripheral downstream effectors that may not be disease modifying.
“Mapping the gene regulatory networks that drive disease progression enables screening for molecules that correct the network by normalizing core regulatory elements, rather than targeting peripheral downstream effectors that may not be disease modifying4,5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell 160, 1072–1086 (2015). source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [5] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease. Science 371, eabd0724 (2021). source
- Findingown data
Geneformer cell embeddings clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype as opposed to individual patient.
“Using a publicly available aortic aneurysm dataset14 as a test case, we found that while the original data was impacted by inter-patient variability, Geneformer cell embeddings clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype as opposed to individual patient (Extended Data Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source
- Findingcitation
Embeddings of genes in iPSC-derived myogenic cells showed similar context awareness with in silico differentiation via MYOD.
“Embeddings of genes in iPSC-derived myogenic cells16 showed similar context awareness with in silico differentiation via MYOD (Extended Data Fig. 2d–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Guo, D. et al. iMyoblasts for ex vivo and in vivo investigations of human myogenesis and disease modeling. eLife 11, e70341 (2022). source
- Findingown data
In silico reprogramming fibroblasts by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the remaining genes in the transcriptome's embedding towards the iPSC state.
“When we in silico reprogrammed fibroblasts15 by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC to the front of their rank value encodings, the remaining genes in the transcriptome significantly shifted their embedding towards the iPSC state (Extended Data Fig. 2b–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Xing, Q. R. et al. Diversification of reprogramming trajectories revealed by parallel single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility sequencing. Sci. Adv. 6, 463–474 (2020). source
- Findingown data
In silico deletion of GATA4 had a significantly higher effect on genes known to be most significantly dysregulated by GATA4 variants in a previously reported iPSC disease model of GATA4-related heart defects.
“In silico deletion of GATA4 had a significantly higher effect on genes known to be most significantly dysregulated by GATA4 variants in a previously reported iPSC disease model of GATA4-related heart defects33 (Extended Data Fig. 9e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Ang, Y. S. et al. Disease model of GATA4 mutation reveals transcription factor cooperativity in human cardiogenesis. Cell 167, 1734–1749 (2016). source
- Findingown data
Direct GATA4 targets (as defined by ChIP-seq) were significantly more impacted by in silico deletion of GATA4 in fetal cardiomyocytes compared to indirect targets.
“Notably, direct GATA4 targets (as defined by ChIP-seq33) were significantly more impacted by in silico deletion of GATA4 in fetal cardiomyocytes compared to indirect targets (Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Ang, Y. S. et al. Disease model of GATA4 mutation reveals transcription factor cooperativity in human cardiogenesis. Cell 167, 1734–1749 (2016). source
- Findingcitation
In silico deletion of GATA4 or TBX5 alone had a significantly more deleterious effect on their known co-bound targets compared to housekeeping genes.
“Indeed, in silico deletion of GATA4 or TBX5 alone had a significantly more deleterious effect on their known co-bound targets33 compared to housekeeping genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Ang, Y. S. et al. Disease model of GATA4 mutation reveals transcription factor cooperativity in human cardiogenesis. Cell 167, 1734–1749 (2016). source
- Findingown data
20% of attention heads significantly attended transcription factors more than other genes.
“When examining the attention weights in aortic ECs14, we found that 20% of attention heads significantly attended transcription factors more than other genes, indicating that specific attention heads learned, in an entirely self-supervised manner, the relative importance of transcription factors in distinguishing cell states (Fig. 4e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source
- Findingcitation
In silico deletion of TBX5 in fetal cardiomyocytes more significantly impacted its direct targets (as defined by ChIP-seq) compared to indirect targets and housekeeping genes.
“Analogously, in silico deletion of TBX5, another known congenital heart disease gene, in fetal cardiomyocytes23 more significantly impacted its direct targets (as defined by ChIP-seq34) compared to indirect targets and housekeeping genes (Extended Data Fig. 9f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [23] Cao, J. et al. A human cell atlas of fetal gene expression. Science 370, 808 (2020). source
- cites [34] Kathiriya, I. S. et al. Modeling human TBX5 haploinsufficiency predicts regulatory networks for congenital heart disease. Dev. Cell 56, 292–309 (2021). source
The Results sections on cardiomyocyte function and transcriptional responses report TBX5 loss-of-function in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and an association between TBX5-sensitive genes and TBX5 binding sites. They do not report an in silico deletion in fetal cardiomyocytes. The direct-versus-indirect-target comparison is pointed to the citing paper’s Extended Data Fig. 9f, rather than clearly attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
By fine-tuning Geneformer using solely transcriptional data with only 56 labeled loci in ~15,000 ESCs, the model could predict the results of more recent studies that included genome-wide profiling of bivalent domains.
“Thus, by fine-tuning Geneformer using solely transcriptional data with only 56 labeled loci in ~15,000 ESCs, the model could predict the results of more recent studies30 that included genome-wide profiling of bivalent domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Pan, G. et al. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 299–312 (2007). source
- Premisecitation
Chen et al. previously systematically integrated thousands of transcription factor binding and histone modification profiles assayed by ChIP-seq with thousands of gene expression profiles to identify two classes of transcription factors with distinct ranges of regulatory influence.
“Chen et al. previously systematically integrated thousands of transcription factor binding and histone modification profiles assayed by chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) with thousands of gene expression profiles to identify two classes of transcription factors with distinct ranges of regulatory influence31.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Chen, C. H. et al. Determinants of transcription factor regulatory range. Nat. Commun. 11, 2472 (2020). source
- Findingown data
In silico deletion of genes linked by a prior GWAS to cardiac MRI traits relevant to cardiac disease had a larger effect compared to the control set.
“In silico deletion of genes linked by a prior genome-wide association study24 (GWAS) to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) traits relevant to cardiac disease also had a larger effect compared to the control set (Extended Data Fig. 7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Pirruccello, J. P. et al. Analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 36,000 individuals yields genetic insights into dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Commun. 11, 2254 (2020). source
- Findingown data
Fine-tuned Geneformer to distinguish cardiomyocytes from non-failing hearts (n=9) or hearts affected by hypertrophic (n=11) or dilated (n=9) cardiomyopathy with an overall out-of-sample accuracy of 90%.
“First, we fine-tuned Geneformer to distinguish cardiomyocytes35 from non-failing hearts (n=9) or hearts affected by hypertrophic (n=11) or dilated (n=9) cardiomyopathy with an overall out-of-sample accuracy of 90% (Fig. 6b, Extended Data Fig. 10a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Chaffin, M. et al. Single-nucleus profiling of human dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nature 608, 174–180 (2022). source
- Findingown data
Geneformer was able to distinguish central versus peripheral factors in the N1-dependent network with fine-tuning on 884 ECs from healthy versus dilated aortas to a better degree than the alternative methods' predictions trained on the larger dataset of ~30,000 ECs.
“Interestingly, Geneformer was able to distinguish central versus peripheral factors in the N1-dependent network with fine-tuning on this very minimal data to a better degree than the alternative methods’ predictions trained on the larger dataset of ~30,000 ECs32, demonstrating the strength of pretraining in enabling predictions from increasingly limited data (Fig. 4d, Extended Data Fig. 9b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 455–472 (2020). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In silico deletion of TBX5 was significantly more deleterious to previously reported TBX5 direct targets.
“In silico deletion of TBX5 was significantly more deleterious to previously reported TBX5 direct targets34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Kathiriya, I. S. et al. Modeling human TBX5 haploinsufficiency predicts regulatory networks for congenital heart disease. Dev. Cell 56, 292–309 (2021). source
The Results section, “Discrete transcriptional responses to reduced TBX5 dosage in cardiomyocytes” (page unavailable), reports that TBX5 occupancy was associated with dosage-vulnerable genes and that 61 of 85 stepwise dose-dependent genes were near TBX5 binding sites. It does not report an in silico TBX5 deletion or a statistically significant comparison showing greater harm to previously reported direct targets. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
As cells pass through each layer of the Geneformer model fine-tuned to distinguish indicated cell types using only Drop-seq data, the model successively extrudes them from each other to derive separable embeddings that distinguish the cell types.
“As the cells pass through each layer, the model successively extrudes them from each other to derive separable embeddings that distinguish the cell types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Selewa, A. et al. Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomes during cardiomyocyte differentiation. Sci. Rep. 10, 1535 (2020). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
Cells which do not progress to the iPSC state bifurcate into an alternative fate compared to cells that progress to the iPSC state after the day 12 stage.
“Cell embeddings suggested that cells which do not progress to the iPSC state bifurcate into an alternative fate compared to cells that progress to the iPSC state after the day 12 stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Xing, Q. R. et al. Diversification of reprogramming trajectories revealed by parallel single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility sequencing. Sci. Adv. 6, 463–474 (2020). source
The Results section on pseudotemporal trajectories reports branching paths and distinguishes a non-reprogrammed state 8 from a successfully reprogrammed state 9. It also places unsuccessful and successful subgroups as early as day 8, so the copy does not establish that the bifurcation occurs after day 12. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In silico deletion of GATA4 was significantly more deleterious to previously reported highest confidence GATA4 targets than to housekeeping genes.
“In silico deletion of GATA4 was significantly more deleterious to the previously reported highest confidence GATA4 targets33 than to housekeeping genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Ang, Y. S. et al. Disease model of GATA4 mutation reveals transcription factor cooperativity in human cardiogenesis. Cell 167, 1734–1749 (2016). source
- Findingown data
Pretrained Geneformer cell embeddings of cells undergoing iPSC to myoblast differentiation captured the earlier S1 (PAX3+) and later S2B (PAX3+/MYOD+) stages.
“UMAP of pretrained Geneformer cell embeddings of cells undergoing iPSC to myoblast differentiation at the earlier S1 (PAX3+) and later S2B (PAX3+/MYOD+) stages”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Guo, D. et al. iMyoblasts for ex vivo and in vivo investigations of human myogenesis and disease modeling. eLife 11, e70341 (2022). source
The Results section on scRNA-seq (page unavailable) identifies an earlier PAX3-expressing S1 cluster and a more differentiated S2B subcluster expressing MYOD1. The paper used Seurat to analyze the cells and visualize clusters with UMAP; it does not report pretrained Geneformer embeddings or establish PAX3 expression specifically in S2B. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Pretrained Geneformer cell embeddings of cells undergoing iPSC reprogramming appropriately captured the temporal trajectory of reprogramming.
“UMAP of pretrained Geneformer cell embeddings of cells undergoing iPSC reprogramming appropriately captured temporal trajectory of reprogramming”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Xing, Q. R. et al. Diversification of reprogramming trajectories revealed by parallel single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility sequencing. Sci. Adv. 6, 463–474 (2020). source
The Results section (‘Single-cell profiling of human cell fate reprogramming’; page unavailable) reports that UMAP clustering showed a dynamic transition from parental cells to successfully reprogrammed cells. The source thus supports the temporal reprogramming pattern, but it does not report an analysis of pretrained Geneformer cell embeddings or establish that those embeddings captured it. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In silico deletion of TBX5 was significantly more deleterious to previously reported TBX5 direct targets than to housekeeping genes or TBX5 indirect targets.
“In silico deletion of TBX5 was significantly more deleterious to previously reported TBX5 direct targets34 than to housekeeping genes or TBX5 indirect targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Kathiriya, I. S. et al. Modeling human TBX5 haploinsufficiency predicts regulatory networks for congenital heart disease. Dev. Cell 56, 292–309 (2021). source
- Findingown data
The authors assembled Genecorpus-30M, comprised of 29.9 million human single cell transcriptomes from a broad range of tissues from publicly available data.
“We assembled a large-scale pretraining corpus, Genecorpus-30M, comprised of 29.9 million human single cell transcriptomes from a broad range of tissues from publicly available data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The authors developed Geneformer, a context-aware, attention-based deep learning model pretrained on large-scale transcriptomic data to enable predictions in settings with limited data.
“Here, we developed a context-aware, attention-based deep learning model, Geneformer, pretrained on large-scale transcriptomic data to enable predictions in settings with limited data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues.
- Findingown data
Gene embeddings were dependent on the context of other genes expressed in the cell, highlighting Geneformer's context awareness.
“However, gene embeddings were dependent on the context of other genes expressed in the cell, highlighting Geneformer’s context awareness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Geneformer was pretrained on Genecorpus-30M using a self-supervised masked learning objective to gain a fundamental understanding of network dynamics.
“We then pretrained Geneformer on this corpus using a self-supervised masked learning objective to gain a fundamental understanding of network dynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pretrained Geneformer accurately predicted dosage-sensitive disease genes and their downstream targets through a context-aware in silico deletion approach.
“The pretrained Geneformer accurately predicted dosage-sensitive disease genes and their downstream targets through a context-aware in silico deletion approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Applied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental inhibition significantly improved cardiomyocyte contraction in an iPSC-based model of the disease.
“Applied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental inhibition significantly improved cardiomyocyte contraction in an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based model of the disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fine-tuning Geneformer towards a diverse panel of downstream tasks relevant to chromatin and network dynamics using limited task-specific data demonstrated that Geneformer consistently boosted predictive accuracy.
“Furthermore, fine-tuning Geneformer towards a diverse panel of downstream tasks relevant to chromatin and network dynamics using just a limited set of task-specific training examples demonstrated that Geneformer consistently boosted predictive accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict bivalently marked genes compared to alternative methods (AUC 0.93 and 0.88; bivalent versus unmethylated or H3K4me3-only, respectively).
“Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict bivalently marked genes compared to alternative methods (AUC 0.93 and 0.88; bivalent versus unmethylated or H3K4me3-only, respectively) (Fig. 3a–b, Extended Data Fig. 7d–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fine-tuned Geneformer model correctly predicted the high confidence genes to be dosage-sensitive in the specific context of fetal cerebral cells with 96% concordance with the original study.
“The fine-tuned Geneformer model correctly predicted the high confidence genes to be dosage-sensitive in the specific context of fetal cerebral cells with 96% concordance with the original study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In silico deletion of known cardiomyopathy and structural heart disease genes had a significantly larger effect than the control set of known hyperlipidemia genes in fetal cardiomyocytes.
“In silico deletion of known cardiomyopathy and structural heart disease genes had a significantly larger effect than the control set of known hyperlipidemia genes, which are expressed in cardiomyocytes and related to heart disease but whose phenotype affects cell types other than cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The final layers were dominated by centrality-driven attention heads that focused on the highest ranked genes that uniquely define each cell state.
“The middle layers were most broad in terms of gene ranks they attended, and the final layers were dominated by centrality-driven attention heads that focused on the highest ranked genes that uniquely define each cell state (Extended Data Fig. 9c–d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The middle layers were most broad in terms of gene ranks they attended.
“The middle layers were most broad in terms of gene ranks they attended, and the final layers were dominated by centrality-driven attention heads that focused on the highest ranked genes that uniquely define each cell state (Extended Data Fig. 9c–d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genes whose deletion was predicted to have the most deleterious effect on cardiomyocytes were significantly enriched for human phenotypes including cardiomyopathy and abnormal myocardial morphology.
“Overall, genes whose deletion was predicted to have the most deleterious effect on cardiomyocytes were significantly enriched for human phenotypes including cardiomyopathy and abnormal myocardial morphology (Supplementary Table 3–4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More than twice as many general cardiac ECs were needed to gain similar predictive potential as was possible from fine-tuning with the more relevant data from healthy versus dilated aortas.
“More than twice as many general cardiac ECs were needed to gain similar predictive potential as was possible from fine-tuning with the more relevant data from healthy versus dilated aortas, suggesting that the minimum amount of fine-tuning data needed is dependent on both the specific application and relevance of the data to that task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Specific attention heads significantly attended central regulatory nodes to a greater degree than peripheral genes within N1-dependent network in ECs.
“Furthermore, specific attention heads significantly attended central regulatory nodes to a greater degree than peripheral genes within N1-dependent network in ECs (Extended Data Fig. 9c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Exposure to hundreds of experimental datasets during pretraining appeared to promote robustness to batch-dependent technical artifacts and individual variability that commonly impact single cell analyses in biology.
“Additionally, exposure to hundreds of experimental datasets during pretraining also appeared to promote robustness to batch-dependent technical artifacts and individual variability that commonly impact single cell analyses in biology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fine-tuned Geneformer predicted moderate confidence genes to be dosage-sensitive in fetal cerebral cells with 84% concordance with the original study.
“The fine-tuned Geneformer predicted moderate confidence genes to be dosage-sensitive in fetal cerebral cells with 84% concordance with the original study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict the regulatory range of transcription factors compared to alternative methods, whose predictions were near random.
“Again, Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict the regulatory range of transcription factors compared to alternative methods, whose predictions were near random (Fig. 3e, Extended Data Fig. 8d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Moderate confidence genes were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at a higher rate in fetal cerebral cells compared to neurons across any adult or developmental timepoint.
“The moderate confidence genes were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at a higher rate in fetal cerebral cells compared to neurons across any adult or developmental timepoint, consistent with these genes’ association with predominantly neurodevelopmental phenotypes where adult neurons may be less relevant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
High confidence genes were predicted by Geneformer to be dosage-sensitive at similar rates in fetal cerebral (96%) and other cells (95%).
“Interestingly, although the high confidence genes, which may have a stronger effect, were predicted by Geneformer to be dosage-sensitive at similar rates in fetal cerebral (96%) and other cells (95%), the predicted dosage sensitivity of the moderate confidence genes appeared to be more context-specific.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Geneformer's predictions of bivalently marked genes were generalizable to the remainder of the genome that was excluded from fine-tuning.
“Furthermore, predictions were generalizable to the remainder of the genome that was excluded from fine-tuning (Fig. 3c, Extended Data Fig. 8a–c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fine-tuned Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict dosage sensitivity compared to alternative methods (AUC 0.91).
“The fine-tuned Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict dosage sensitivity compared to alternative methods (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.91) (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 7a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pretraining with larger and more diverse corpuses consistently improved the predictive power in the downstream dosage sensitivity task despite using the same amount of limited task-specific data for fine-tuning.
“Notably, pretraining with larger and more diverse corpuses consistently improved the predictive power in the downstream task despite using the same amount of limited task-specific data for fine-tuning (Fig. 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CRISPR-mediated knockout of novel candidate TEAD4 in iPSC-derived cardiac microtissues caused a significant reduction in their ability to generate contractile stress.
“Experimental validation demonstrated that CRISPR-mediated knockout of novel candidate TEAD4 in iPSC-derived cardiac microtissues caused a significant reduction in their ability to generate contractile stress (force per unit area) (Fig. 2e, Extended Data Fig. 7c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Attention heads in the earliest layers were consistently the most diverse in terms of gene ranks they attended.
“Interestingly, attention heads in the earliest layers were consistently the most diverse in terms of gene ranks they attended, suggesting the model initially orients to the observed cell state through a joint survey of distinct portions of the input space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pretraining with larger and more diverse corpora consistently improved Geneformer's predictive power.
“Furthermore, we found that pretraining with larger and more diverse corpuses consistently improved Geneformer’s predictive power”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Centrality-driven attention heads consistently attended to a significantly greater degree the highest ranked genes in each cell's unique rank value encoding in aortic ECs, smooth muscle cells, T cells, and macrophage/monocyte/dendritic cells.
“Concordantly, these centrality-driven attention heads consistently attended to a significantly greater degree the highest ranked genes in each cell’s unique rank value encoding in aortic ECs, smooth muscle cells, T cells, and macrophage/monocyte/dendritic cells (which each have different sets of highest ranked genes based on cell type context) (Extended Data Fig. 9d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Nearly equivalent predictive potential was retained even when reducing the fine-tuning data to only 5,000 ECs.
“We found that nearly equivalent predictive potential was retained even when reducing the fine-tuning data to only 5,000 ECs (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CRISPR-mediated knockout of both Geneformer-predicted targets GSN and PLN in TTN+/- cells significantly improved the contractile stress of the TTN+/- cardiac microtissues.
“Strikingly, CRISPR-mediated knockout of both Geneformer-predicted targets GSN and PLN in the TTN+/− cells significantly improved the contractile stress of the TTN+/− cardiac microtissues, validating these genes as promising candidate therapeutic targets for this disease (Fig. 6f–g, Extended Data Fig. 10e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Geneformer boosted cell type predictions in a variety of tissues, with the gap in performance by accuracy and macro F1 score increasing as the number of cell type classes increased.
“Compared to these alternative methods, Geneformer boosted cell type predictions in a variety of tissues, with the gap in performance by accuracy and macro F1 score increasing as the number of cell type classes increased, indicating that Geneformer was robust in even increasingly complex multiclass prediction applications (Extended Data Fig. 5–6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pretrained Geneformer contextual attention versus gene rank in rank value encoding in indicated aortic cell types, which each have different sets of highest ranked genes based on cell type context.
“Pretrained Geneformer contextual attention versus gene rank in rank value encoding in the indicated aortic cell types, which each have different sets of highest ranked genes based on cell type context”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Geneformer fine-tuned for cell type annotation in indicated human tissues had predictive potential as measured by accuracy and macro F1 score compared to XGBoost (CaSTLe) and deep neural network-based (scDeepSort) methods.
“Predictive potential (as measured by accuracy and macro F1 score) of Geneformer fine-tuned for cell type annotation in the indicated human tissues as compared to XGBoost (CaSTLe) and deep neural network-based (scDeepSort) methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Genes such as transcription factors that may be lowly expressed when they are expressed but highly distinguish cell state move to a higher rank within the encoding.
“Conversely, genes such as transcription factors that may be lowly expressed when they are expressed but highly distinguish cell state will move to a higher rank within the encoding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
- Findingreasoning
The rank value encoding method deprioritizes ubiquitously highly-expressed housekeeping genes by normalizing them to a lower rank.
“Specifically, this method will deprioritize ubiquitously highly-expressed housekeeping genes by normalizing them to a lower rank.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
- Findingown data
Inaccurate predictions were predominantly in predicting that cardiomyocyte type 2 was type 1, as expected given the minimal examples of cardiomyocyte type 2 in the Drop-seq data.
“Of note, inaccurate predictions were predominantly in predicting that cardiomyocyte type 2 was type 1, as expected given the minimal examples of cardiomyocyte type 2 in the Drop-seq data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Predictive potential on the downstream fine-tuning task was essentially equivalent by AUC, confusion matrices, and F1 score whether task-specific data was included in or excluded from the pretraining corpus.
“Predictive potential on the downstream fine-tuning task was measured by 5-fold cross-validation with these 10,000 cells, demonstrating essentially equivalent results by AUC, confusion matrices, and F1 score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
QPCR data of CRISPR-mediated knockout of TEAD4 in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes showed a significant effect (n=3, *p<0.05 by t-test).
“Quantitative PCR (QPCR) data of CRISPR-mediated knockout of TEAD4 in iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (n=3, *p<0.05 by t-test; center line=median, box limits=upper and lower quartiles, whiskers=1.5x interquartile range, points=experimental replicates).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Housekeeping genes on average show a trend of a higher normalization factor compared to all genes, resulting in deprioritization in the rank value encoding.
“Housekeeping genes on average show a trend of a higher normalization factor (resulting in deprioritization in the rank value encoding) compared to all genes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
- Findingown data
Gene sets significantly associated with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy states by Geneformer in silico deletion disease modeling significantly overlapped with genes differentially expressed in those respective disease states (differentially expressed vs. non-failing) compared to the overlap of those differentially expressed genes with background genes.
“Gene sets significantly associated with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy states by Geneformer in silico deletion disease modeling significantly overlapped with genes differentially expressed in those respective disease states (differentially expressed vs. non-failing) compared to the overlap of those differentially expressed genes with background genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In silico deletion of certain genes in cardiomyocytes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients significantly shifted embeddings towards the non-failing state and away from the dilated cardiomyopathy state.
“Pathway enrichment for genes whose in silico deletion in cardiomyocytes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients significantly shifted embeddings towards the non-failing state and away from the dilated cardiomyopathy state, suggesting candidate therapeutic targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
While original data was highly affected by patient batch effect, cell embeddings generated by pretrained Geneformer (without fine-tuning) clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype.
“While original data (left) was highly affected by patient batch effect, cell embeddings generated by pretrained Geneformer (right) (without fine-tuning) clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The gap in performance of Geneformer compared to alternatives increased as the number of cell type classes increased.
“the gap in performance of Geneformer compared to alternatives increased as the number of cell type classes increased”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
27.4 million (27,406,217) cells passed the defined quality filters.
“Ultimately, 27.4 million (27,406,217) cells passed the defined quality filters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Specific embedding dimension activations distinguish each lung cell type in the fine-tuned model.
“Specific embedding dimension activations distinguish each lung cell type in the fine-tuned model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to in silico differentiation with random genes, in silico differentiation of early-stage myogenic cells by artificially adding MYOD to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the gene embeddings from their earlier state to the embedding of that gene in the later MYOD+ myogenic state.
“Compared to in silico differentiation with random genes, in silico differentiation of the early-stage myogenic cells by artificially adding MYOD to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the gene embeddings from their earlier state to the embedding of that gene in the later MYOD+ myogenic state”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Genecorpus-30M comprises 29.9 million (29,900,531) human single cell transcriptomes from a broad range of tissues from publicly available data.
“We assembled a large-scale pretraining corpus, Genecorpus-30M, comprised of 29.9 million (29,900,531) human single cell transcriptomes from a broad range of tissues from publicly available data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell embeddings generated by pretrained Geneformer without fine-tuning clustered primarily by cell type.
“While original data (left) was highly affected by patient batch effect, cell embeddings generated by pretrained Geneformer (right) (without fine-tuning) clustered primarily by cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pretrained Geneformer attention weights in aortic ECs demonstrated that specific attention heads learned in a completely self-supervised way the relative centrality of the top most central versus most peripheral genes in the N1-dependent gene network.
“Pretrained Geneformer attention weights in aortic ECs demonstrated that specific attention heads learned in a completely self-supervised way the relative centrality of the top most central versus most peripheral genes in the N1-dependent gene network (higher valence=more central)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Known context-dependent NOTCH genes showed higher variance in their contextual embeddings across variable aortic cell types compared to housekeeping gene GAPDH.
“Known context-dependent NOTCH genes showed higher variance in their contextual embeddings across variable aortic cell types compared to housekeeping gene GAPDH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Original data was highly affected by patient batch effect.
“While original data (left) was highly affected by patient batch effect, cell embeddings generated by pretrained Geneformer (right) (without fine-tuning) clustered primarily by cell type.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell type predictions on DroNc-seq data by the model fine-tuned only on Drop-seq data had out-of-sample accuracy 84%.
“Cell type predictions on the DroNc-seq data by the model fine-tuned only on the Drop-seq data (out of sample accuracy 84%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to in silico reprogramming with random genes, in silico reprogramming of fibroblasts by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC (OSKM) to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the gene embeddings from their initial fibroblast state to the embedding of that gene in the iPSC state.
“Compared to in silico reprogramming with random genes, in silico reprogramming of fibroblasts by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC (OSKM) to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the gene embeddings from their initial fibroblast state to the embedding of that gene in the iPSC state”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The rank-based approach may be more robust against technical artifacts that may systematically bias absolute transcript counts value while the overall relative ranking of genes within each cell remains more stable.
“Furthermore, this rank-based approach may be more robust against technical artifacts that may systematically bias the absolute transcript counts value while the overall relative ranking of genes within each cell remains more stable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Context-awareness is a unique strength of Geneformer's model architecture that allows predictions specific to each cell context.
“Accordingly, context-awareness is a unique strength of Geneformer’s model architecture that allows predictions specific to each cell context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model from which fine-tuning towards a broad range of downstream applications can be pursued to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets.
“Overall, Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model from which fine-tuning towards a broad range of downstream applications can be pursued to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In silico treatment analysis using limited data may thus enable therapeutic discovery in innumerable diseases that have been previously impeded by limited data due to being rare or affecting clinically inaccessible tissue.
“In silico treatment analysis using limited data may thus enable therapeutic discovery in innumerable diseases that have been previously impeded by limited data due to being rare or affecting clinically inaccessible tissue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings provide experimental validation in support of the utility of Geneformer as a tool for discovery of candidate therapeutic targets in human disease.
“These findings provide experimental validation in support of the utility of Geneformer as a tool for discovery of candidate therapeutic targets in human disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Experimental validation of a novel dosage-sensitive gene candidate in fetal cardiomyocytes, TEAD4, supports the utility of Geneformer for driving novel biological insights in human development.
“Experimental validation of a novel dosage-sensitive gene candidate in fetal cardiomyocytes, TEAD4, supports the utility of Geneformer for driving novel biological insights in human development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The minimum amount of fine-tuning data needed is dependent on both the specific application and relevance of the data to that task.
“More than twice as many general cardiac ECs were needed to gain similar predictive potential as was possible from fine-tuning with the more relevant data from healthy versus dilated aortas, suggesting that the minimum amount of fine-tuning data needed is dependent on both the specific application and relevance of the data to that task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Fine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer model improved predictions even for the higher-order transcription factor property of regulatory range.
“Thus, fine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer model was able to improve predictions even for this higher-order transcription factor property of regulatory range, a particularly challenging characteristic to infer from transcriptional data alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These data suggest that in silico perturbation can be applied to model gene network connections.
“These data suggest that in silico perturbation can be applied to model gene network connections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Geneformer was robust in increasingly complex multiclass prediction applications.
“indicating that Geneformer was robust in even increasingly complex multiclass prediction applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Genes whose in silico deletion in cardiomyocytes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients shifted embeddings towards the non-failing state and away from the dilated cardiomyopathy state are candidate therapeutic targets.
“Pathway enrichment for genes whose in silico deletion in cardiomyocytes from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients significantly shifted embeddings towards the non-failing state and away from the dilated cardiomyopathy state, suggesting candidate therapeutic targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The imbalance of cardiomyocyte type 1 and 2 between the platforms suggests that these cellular subtypes may be an artifact of variable gene detection between the two platforms.
“The imbalance of cardiomyocyte type 1 and 2 between the platforms also suggests that these cellular subtypes may be an artifact of variable gene detection between the two platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- May combine two claims. 27
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe self-attention mechanism has transformed deep learning by generating context-aware models that can pay attention to large input spaces and learn which elements are most important in each context, boosting predictions.
“The advent of the self-attention mechanism1,2 has further transformed the deep learning field by generating context-aware models that are able to pay attention to large input spaces and learn which elements are most important to focus on in each context, boosting predictions in a wide realm of applications2,8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source
The Background (p. 2) describes self-attention as relating positions within a sequence and reports its successful use in several tasks. Section 3.2.3 (p. 5) says each encoder position can attend to all positions in the preceding layer, and the Machine Translation results (p. 8) report improved translation scores. These passages support the mechanism and some performance gains, but do not establish that it transformed deep learning or boosted predictions across a wide realm of applications. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
- cites [8] Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X. & Qiu, X. A survey of transformers. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.04554 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFine-tuned Geneformer's cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using ComBat or Harmony methods.
“Interestingly, the fine-tuned Geneformer’s cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using the ComBat17 or Harmony18 methods (Extended Data Fig. 4b–f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa078 (2020). source
- cites [18] Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransfer learning has revolutionized natural language understanding and computer vision by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards downstream tasks with limited task-specific data.
“Recently, transfer learning has revolutionized fields such as natural language understanding1,2 and computer vision3 by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards a vast array of downstream tasks with limited task-specific data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
- cites [3] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 770–778 (IEEE, 2016). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pretrained Geneformer's gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform, preservation method, and individual patient variability.
“We found that the gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform11, preservation method12,13, and individual patient variability14 (Extended Data Fig. 2a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [11] Selewa, A. et al. Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomes during cardiomyocyte differentiation. Sci. Rep. 10, 1535 (2020). source
The Methods and Results compare Drop-seq and DroNc-seq transcriptomes, but no passage assesses Geneformer gene embeddings or their robustness to sequencing platform. The Results instead report substantial differences in gene detection between the two techniques; that does not establish whether the citing authors’ embeddings were robust. Citation 11 is attached only to the sequencing-platform part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [12] 10x Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13] 10X Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPretraining with a masked learning objective improves generalizability of foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.
“Pretraining was accomplished using a masked learning objective, which has been shown in other informational fields1,2 to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source
The Background (p. 2) discusses self-attention across several tasks, and §6.3 (p. 10) reports Transformer results on constituency parsing. Neither passage addresses whether a masked pretraining objective improves generalizability for downstream fine-tuning; searches for masked learning and pretraining found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model identified 478 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards dilated cardiomyopathy, which were enriched for pathways involved in muscle contraction and mitochondrial function.
“The model identified 478 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards dilated cardiomyopathy, which were enriched for pathways involved in muscle contraction38 and mitochondrial39 function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [38] Kamisago, M. et al. Mutations in sarcomere protein genes as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. New Engl. J. Med. 343, 1688–1696 (2000). source
- cites [39] Ramaccini, D. et al. Mitochondrial function and dysfunction in dilated cardiomyopathy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.624216 (2021). source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataGeneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict central versus peripheral factors within the N1-dependent gene network using only single cell transcriptional data from ~30,000 normal endothelial cells without any perturbation data (AUC 0.81).
“Again, Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict central versus peripheral factors compared to alternative methods (AUC 0.81) (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 8e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 455–472 (2020). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model identified 447 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy state, which were enriched for pathways including Titin binding and sarcomere organization known to impact hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis.
“Overall, the model identified 447 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy state, which were enriched for pathways including Titin binding36 and sarcomere organization37 known to impact hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Hinson, J. T. et al. Titin mutations in iPS cells define sarcomere insufficiency as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Science 349, 982–986 (2015). source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Seidman, C. E. & Seidman, J. G. Identifying sarcomere gene mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a personal history. Circ. Res. 108, 743–750 (2011). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTop enriched pathways for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pointed to candidate cardiomyocyte-specific therapeutic targets including ADCY5 and druggable targets including SRPK3.
“Top enriched pathways for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pointed to candidate cardiomyocyte-specific therapeutic targets including ADCY5, disruption of which is associated with longevity and protection against cardiomyopathy in mouse models40, as well as druggable targets41 including SRPK3, a downstream effector of MEF242 which is known to play a critical role in myocardial cell hypertrophy43.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [40] Ho, D., Yan, L., Iwatsubo, K., Vatner, D. E. & Vatner, S. F. Modulation of β-adrenergic receptor signaling in heart failure and longevity: targeting adenylyl cyclase type 5. Heart Fail. Rev. 15, 495–512 (2010). source
- cites [41] Wagner, A. H. et al. DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug-gene interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1036–D1044 (2016). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes DGIdb as a resource for checking whether candidate genes belong to potentially druggable categories, supporting the citation’s use for identifying druggable targets. Our copy does not identify SRPK3 as druggable or link it to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, so it does not support that specific example. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [42] Nakagawa, O. et al. Centronuclear myopathy in mice lacking a novel muscle-specific protein kinase transcriptionally regulated by MEF2. Genes Dev. 19, 2066–2077 (2005). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe authors previously mapped the NOTCH1-dependent gene network governing cardiac valve disease and identified central regulatory nodes whose correction had broad restorative impact on the network at large.
“We previously mapped the NOTCH1 (N1)-dependent gene network governing cardiac valve disease and identified central regulatory nodes whose correction had broad restorative impact on the network at large4,5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell 160, 1072–1086 (2015). source
- cites [5] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease. Science 371, eabd0724 (2021). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTEAD4 is a transcription factor involved in the Hippo signaling pathway.
“TEAD4 is a transcription factor involved in the Hippo signaling pathway27, and future work is warranted to further examine its role in cardiac development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Currey, L., Thor, S. & Piper, M. TEAD family transcription factors in development and disease. Development 148, dev196675 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer on the Heart Atlas ECs was able to distinguish N1 downstream targets from non-targets without any perturbation data, significantly boosting predictions compared to alternative methods.
“Additionally, fine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer on the Heart Atlas ECs32 was able to distinguish N1 downstream targets from non-targets without any perturbation data, further demonstrating the model’s ability to encode key features of gene network dynamics and again significantly boosting predictions compared to alternative methods (Fig. 4b, Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 455–472 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the top 25 deleted genes with the most significant effect were transcription factors known to regulate myocardial development (e.g. FOXM1) and entirely novel dosage-sensitive gene candidates such as TEAD4.
“Among the top 25 deleted genes with the most significant effect were transcription factors known to regulate myocardial development (e.g. FOXM125,26) and entirely novel dosage-sensitive gene candidates such as TEAD4 (Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [25] Bolte, C. et al. Expression of Foxm1 transcription factor in cardiomyocytes is required for myocardial development. PLoS ONE 6, e22217 (2011). source
- cites [26] Bolte, C. et al. Postnatal ablation of Foxm1 from cardiomyocytes causes late onset cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis without exacerbating pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling. PLoS ONE 7, e48713 (2012). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGeneformer fine-tuned with only Drop-seq data automatically integrated DroNc-seq data such that the fine-tuned Geneformer cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using ComBat or Harmony.
“Geneformer fine-tuned with only Drop-seq data automatically integrated DroNc-seq data such that the fine-tuned Geneformer cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using the ComBat17 or Harmony18 methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa078 (2020). source
- cites [18] Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMasked learning objective has been shown in other informational fields to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.
“Pretraining was accomplished using a masked learning objective, which has been shown in other informational fields1,2 to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source
Section 3.2.3 (p. 5) describes masking decoder attention to preserve autoregressive prediction, not a masked pretraining objective. The Abstract (p. 1) and Section 6.3 (pp. 9–10) discuss applying the Transformer to translation and parsing, but do not show that masked pretraining improves generalizability across downstream fine-tuning objectives. Searched for masked learning, pretraining, and fine-tuning. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLarge-scale pretraining allows training of deeper models that ultimately have greater predictive potential in fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving.
“consistent with observations that large-scale pretraining allows training of deeper models that ultimately have greater predictive potential in fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving44.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Henighan, T. et al. Scaling laws for autoregressive generative modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.14701 (2020). source
Section 3.4 (p. 15) reports that larger pretrained image models achieve better classification performance than models trained from scratch. Section 2.1 (p. 6) says image and math tasks favor deeper models than language, and Appendix D (p. 31) reports improved language question-answering with model size. The paper does not establish that large-scale pretraining enables training deeper models across all three fields; it distinguishes model size, depth, and the benefit of pretraining. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataEffect on cardiomyocyte embeddings from in silico deletion of genes linked by TWAS-prioritized GWAS to cardiac MRI traits relevant to cardiac pathology was significantly different compared to in silico deletion of control cardiac disease genes expressed in cardiomyocytes but whose pathology occurs in non-cardiomyocyte cell types (hyperlipidemia).
“Effect on cardiomyocyte embeddings from in silico deletion of genes linked by prior transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS)-prioritized GWAS24 to cardiac MRI traits relevant to cardiac pathology (left ventricular (LV) end diastolic volume (EDV), LV end systolic volume (LVESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and stroke volume (SV)) compared to in silico deletion of control cardiac disease genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Pirruccello, J. P. et al. Analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 36,000 individuals yields genetic insights into dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Commun. 11, 2254 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGeneformer gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform, preservation method, and individual patient variability.
“We found that the gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platformM11, preservation method13,12, and individual patient variability14.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites M11
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [13] 10X Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [12] 10x Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source
Citation 14 is attached to individual patient variability. The Discussion describes samples from different patients and says two control sets had similar gene-expression patterns, but it does not assess Geneformer embeddings or their robustness to patient variability. Searches for gene embeddings and patient variability found no passage addressing that claim; the other two conditions are attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDepth was chosen based on the maximum depth for which there was sufficient data to pretrain as it has been established that this approach yields the greatest predictive potential in other informational fields.
“Depth was chosen based on the maximum depth for which there was sufficient data to pretrain as it has been established that this approach yields the greatest predictive potential in other informational fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving44.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Henighan, T. et al. Scaling laws for autoregressive generative modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.14701 (2020). source
Section 2.2 (p. 9) reports performance-maximizing depth-to-width ratios for image and math models and says these domains favor deeper models than language models. It does not establish that choosing the maximum depth permitted by available pretraining data yields the greatest predictive potential across the named fields. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataModerate confidence genes were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at an even lower rate in random cells from any tissue.
“They were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at an even lower rate in random cells from any tissue, highlighting Geneformer’s context awareness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenApplied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy using a limited number of patient samples, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental targeting in an iPSC disease model led to significant functional improvement.
“Applied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy using a limited number of patient samples, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental targeting in an iPSC disease model led to significant functional improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn silico deletion of both GATA4 and TBX5 in combination had an even greater impact on their known co-bound targets than the sum of their individual in silico deletion, suggesting Geneformer recognized their cooperative action at these co-bound targets.
“Furthermore, in silico deletion of both GATA4 and TBX5 in combination had an even greater impact on their known co-bound targets than the sum of their individual in silico deletion, suggesting Geneformer recognized their cooperative action at these co-bound targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe vocabulary included 25,424 protein-coding or miRNA genes detected in a median of 173,152 cells within Genecorpus-30M.
“The rank value encodings for each single cell transcriptome were then tokenized based on a total vocabulary of 25,424 protein-coding or miRNA genes detected in a median of 173,152 cells within Genecorpus-30M.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data15% masking had marginally lower evaluation loss compared to 5% or 30% masking.
“15% masking had marginally lower evaluation loss compared to 5% or 30% masking.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEvaluation loss was essentially equivalent across 3 trials with different random seeds, indicating robustness to the set of genes randomly masked for each cell during pretraining.
“Evaluation loss was essentially equivalent in the 3 trials, indicating robustness to the set of genes randomly masked for each cell during the pretraining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTranscription factors are normalized by a statistically significantly lower factor compared to all genes, resulting in higher prioritization in the rank value encoding.
“Transcription factors are normalized by a statistically significantly lower factor (resulting in higher prioritization in the rank value encoding) compared to all genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data561 datasets were included in Genecorpus-30M.
“Overall, 561 datasets were included and stored as uniform files in the .loom HDF5 format”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningDynamic length-grouped padding achieved a 29.4x speedup in pretraining.
“The trainer from the Huggingface Transformers library159 was used for pretraining with the substitution of a custom tokenizer to implement dynamic, length-grouped padding, which minimized computation on padding and achieved a 29.4x speedup in pretraining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe input size of 2048 fully represents 93% of rank value encodings in Genecorpus-30M.
“input size of 2048 (fully represents 93% of rank value encodings in Genecorpus-30M)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe authors excluded cells with high mutational burdens and established metrics for scalable filtering to exclude possible doublets and/or damaged cells.
“We excluded cells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) that could lead to substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation, and we established metrics for scalable filtering to exclude possible doublets and/or damaged cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA major strength of the self-supervised masked learning approach is that it can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, allowing inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.
“A major strength of this approach is that it is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, which allows the inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe rank value encoding provides a nonparametric representation of each cell's transcriptome and takes advantage of many observations of each gene's expression across Genecorpus-30M to prioritize genes that distinguish cell state.
“Although the rank-based representation has limitations including not fully taking advantage of the precise gene expression measurements provided in transcript counts, the rank value encoding provides a nonparametric representation of each cell’s transcriptome and takes advantage of the many observations of each gene’s expression across Genecorpus-30M to prioritize genes that distinguish cell state”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAttention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.
“Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent; and attention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGeneformer's ability to predict dosage-sensitive disease genes through the context-aware in silico deletion approach represents a valuable asset for interpretation of genetic variants, including prioritization of GWAS hits driving complex traits, and the specific tissues they are expected to affect.
“Geneformer’s ability to predict dosage-sensitive disease genes through the context-aware in silico deletion approach represents a valuable asset for interpretation of genetic variants, including prioritization of GWAS hits driving complex traits, and the specific tissues they are expected to affect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells, maintaining their promoters poised for activation.
“Bivalent chromatin structure is known to mark key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), maintaining their promoters poised for activation28.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–356 (2006). source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataGeneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the model's attention weights in a completely self-supervised manner.
“Through the observation of a vast number of cell states during the pretraining process, Geneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the model’s attention weights in a completely self-supervised manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningCells with less than seven detected Ensembl-annotated protein-coding or miRNA genes were excluded because the 15% masking used for the pretraining learning objective would not reliably mask a gene in cells with fewer detected genes.
“Cells with less than seven detected Ensembl-annotated protein-coding or miRNA genes were excluded as the 15% masking used for the pretraining learning objective would not reliably mask a gene in cells with fewer detected genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to downstream classification predictions because fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives completely separate from the masked learning objective.
“Of note, because the fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives that are completely separate from the masked learning objective, whether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to the classification predictions, as demonstrated in Extended Data Fig. 1f.”
- Also stated in: § Extended Data · plain
“Because the fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives that are completely separate from the masked learning objective, whether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to the downstream classification predictions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Extended Data · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGeneformer is a pretrained deep learning model whose fundamental understanding of network dynamics can be democratized to a broad range of downstream applications to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets in settings with limited data.
“Overall, Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model whose fundamental understanding of network dynamics can now be democratized to a broad range of downstream applications to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets in settings with limited data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningCells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) were excluded to avoid substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation.
“We excluded cells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) that could lead to substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHyperparameter tuning for deep learning applications generally significantly enhances learning and so it is likely that the maximum predictive potential of Geneformer in these downstream applications is significantly underestimated.
“It should be noted that hyperparameter tuning for deep learning applications generally significantly enhances learning and so it is likely that the maximum predictive potential of Geneformer in these downstream applications is significantly underestimated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenApplications that are more relevant to the pretraining objective benefit from more layers being frozen to prevent overfitting to the limited task-specific data, whereas applications that are more distant from the pretraining objective benefit from fine-tuning of more layers to optimize performance on the new task.
“Generally, in our experience, applications that are more relevant to the pretraining objective benefit from more layers being frozen to prevent overfitting to the limited task-specific data, whereas applications that are more distant from the pretraining objective benefit from fine-tuning of more layers to optimize performance on the new task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe masked learning objective is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, allowing inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.
“A major strength of this approach is that it is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, which allows the inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOnly droplet-based sequencing platforms were included to assure expression value unit comparability.
“We only included droplet-based sequencing platforms to assure expression value unit comparability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe rank value encoding method provides a nonparametric representation of each single cell's transcriptome, ranking genes by their expression within that cell normalized by their expression across the entire Genecorpus-30M.
“We developed a novel rank value encoding method that provides a nonparametric representation of each single cell’s transcriptome, ranking genes by their expression within that cell normalized by their expression across the entire Genecorpus-30M”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFine-tuning results for gene classification applications were reported as AUCs +/- standard deviation and F1 score calculated based on a 5-fold cross-validation strategy where training was performed on 80% of the gene training labels and performance was tested on the 20% held-out gene training labels, repeating for 5 folds.
“Fine-tuning results for gene classification applications were reported as AUCs +/− standard deviation and F1 score calculated based on a 5-fold cross-validation strategy where training was performed on 80% of the gene training labels and performance was tested on the 20% held-out gene training labels, repeating for 5 folds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll fine-tuning in Supplementary Table 2 was performed with a single training epoch to avoid overfitting.
“All fine-tuning in Supplementary Table 2 was performed with a single training epoch to avoid overfitting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues.
“Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Network dynamics may vary across cell types, developmental timepoints, or disease states.
“Importantly, network dynamics may vary across cell types, developmental timepoints, or disease states.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent.
“Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent; and attention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mapping the network hierarchy requires large amounts of transcriptional perturbation data from patient-specific cells with isogenic controls to learn the connections between genes.
“Mapping the network hierarchy required large amounts of transcriptional perturbation data from patient-specific cells with isogenic controls to learn the connections between genes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Single cell technologies provide more precise data for inference of network interactions.
“Furthermore, single cell technologies have facilitated the observation of transcriptomic states without averaging genes’ expression across multiple cells, potentially providing more precise data for inference of network interactions, especially in diseases driven by dysregulation of multiple cell types.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
“assuming that a representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GeneFormer focuses on inference of gene function and regulatory networks, which has advantages in exploring the role of specific gene sets and gene clusters in cells and paves the foundation for omics-guided personalized therapy, but its generalization capability needs to be improved.
“GeneFormer [189] focuses on the inference of gene function and regulatory networks, which has certain advantages in exploring the role of specific gene sets and gene clusters in cells and paves the foundation for omics-guided personalized therapy, but its generalization capability needs to be improved.”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [189]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundation cell models are pre-trained on vast amounts (>10M examples) of unlabelled scRNA-seq data, with the aim that such large datasets allow the models to capture general principles of gene regulation and signalling.
“These models are pre-trained on vast amounts (> 10 M examples) of unlabelled scRNA-seq data, with the aim that such large datasets allow the models to capture general principles of gene regulation and signalling.”
From Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
The Geneformer architecture and pretraining section reports a corpus of 29.9 million single-cell transcriptomes, and Methods says pretraining can use completely unlabelled data. The paper describes the goal as learning network dynamics, but it establishes the >10-million-example figure for Geneformer, not for foundation cell models generally; it does not specifically identify signalling as a principle learned. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Geneformer model outputs gene embeddings, which are subsequently decoded into gene predictions.
“The model outputs gene embeddings, which are subsequently decoded into gene predictions.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The Methods sections on gene embeddings and pretraining (page not provided) say Geneformer produces contextual gene embeddings and is trained to predict genes at masked positions. They do not describe the embeddings being subsequently decoded into gene predictions, so that specific sequence is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGeneformer and scGPT offer pretrained weights and have been trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).
“We chose these models because they offer pretrained weights and have been trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The Geneformer architecture and pretraining section reports a corpus of 29.9 million single-cell transcriptomes, and Methods describes a self-supervised masked-learning objective. Methods also describes using pretrained Geneformer weights for fine-tuning. These passages support the claim for Geneformer, but do not establish the same claims about scGPT or that Geneformer’s weights are publicly offered; page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGeneformer can output a sequence of up to 2048 genes and, when input is passed in batches, the model outputs the sequence of the length equal to that of the longest input.
“Geneformer can output a sequence of up to 2048 genes and, when input is passed in batches, the model outputs the sequence of the length equal to that of the longest input.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The Methods section on Geneformer architecture specifies an input size of 2048, and its pretraining section says minibatches are dynamically padded by length. The gene-embeddings section describes an embedding for each input gene. These passages support the size limit and batch-padding behavior, but they do not say that Geneformer outputs a sequence of genes whose length equals the longest input in a batch. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Single-cell foundation models learn robust, generalizable relationships between genes and have demonstrated potential across diverse downstream tasks, including transcriptome prediction following perturbations after fine-tuning.
“By leveraging vast datasets and pretrained transformer architectures (18), these models learn robust, generalizable relationships between genes and have demonstrated potential across diverse downstream tasks, including transcriptome prediction following perturbations after models are fine-tuned on specific datasets (19).”
From A systematic comparison of single-cell perturbation response prediction models (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
The Abstract reports that Geneformer was pretrained on single-cell transcriptomes and improved predictions across diverse downstream tasks after fine-tuning. The Methods (In silico perturbation; Geneformer fine-tuning) describe perturbation effects measured through cell and gene embeddings, while the fine-tuning objectives were gene or cell classification. Our copy does not establish transcriptome prediction following perturbations as a demonstrated fine-tuned task. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundation models for single-cell omics have begun to produce universal embeddings of cells and genes that are robust to batch effects and technical variability and transferable across tissues, conditions, and platforms.
“In parallel, foundation models for single-cell omics have begun to produce universal embeddings of cells and genes that are robust to batch effects and technical variability and transferable across tissues, conditions, and platforms [10, 11].”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
The ‘Context-awareness and batch integration’ section reports both gene and cell embeddings that resist tested batch-related artifacts, including patient variability, and cell embeddings that transfer between two sequencing platforms. ‘Geneformer architecture and pretraining’ describes training on cells from a broad range of tissues, but the cited passages do not establish that the embeddings are universal or demonstrate transfer across tissues and conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGeneformer was pretrained on 27.4M human single-cell transcriptomes (excluding malignant and immortalized cells).
“Genefomer was pretrained on 27.4M human single-cell transcriptomes (excluding malignant and immortalized cells).”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
All datasets used in the benchmark are from cancer cell lines.
“Another limitation is that all datasets are from cancer cell lines, which, for example, Theodoris et al.5 excluded from their training data because of concerns about their high mutational burden.”
From Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines (2025) · cites this paper as Theodoris et al.5
The input to the Geneformer model is a ranked list where a gene's position represents its expression relative to the remaining genes in the cell.
“The input to the Geneformer model is a ranked list where a gene’s position represents its expression relative to the remaining genes in the cell.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Geneformer is trained using a modification of the masked language modeling (MLM) task, where the model is trained to recover randomly selected genes that are masked or corrupted.
“Geneformer is trained using a modification of the masked language modeling (MLM) task, where the model is trained to recover randomly selected genes that are masked or corrupted.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
A cell embedding for Geneformer is calculated by averaging over all gene embeddings extracted for that cell.
“A cell embedding is calculated by averaging over all gene embeddings extracted for that cell.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
The Geneformer model leverages a BERT-inspired architecture with 6 Transformer layers, each with 4 attention heads.
“The model leverages a BERT-inspired architecture with 6 Transformer layers, each with 4 attention heads.”
From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Single-cell foundation models and perturbation predictors support cellular-response forecasting.
“Single-cell foundation models and perturbation predictors support cellular-response forecasting [48-51].”
From RSI-Anything: Unlocking Recursive Self-Improvement with World Models (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Both scGPT and Geneformer fine-tune their cell embeddings for cell type classification.
“Both scGPT and Geneformer fine-tune their cell embeddings for cell type classification.”
From Assessing the limits of zero-shot foundation models in single-cell biology (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Geneformer and scGPT offer pretrained weights and were trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).
“We chose these models because they offer pretrained weights (whereas several other possible models did not have public weights at time of evaluation) and have been trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).”
From Assessing the limits of zero-shot foundation models in single-cell biology (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Most previous works, including scGPT and Geneformer, rely on fine-tuning to specialize task-specific models.
“To evaluate their models, most previous works-including scGPT and Geneformer-rely on fine-tuning to specialize task-specific models.”
From Assessing the limits of zero-shot foundation models in single-cell biology (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization
Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05101 · Cited by 12,522 · see citing works
Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony
Korsunsky, I., Millard, N., Fan, J., Slowikowski, K., Zhang, F., Wei, K., Baglaenko, Y., Brenner, M., Loh, P.-R., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 · Cited by 10,488 · see citing works
Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans
Exome Aggregation Consortium, Lek, M., Karczewski, K. J., Minikel, E. V., Samocha, K. E., Banks, E., Fennell, T., O’Donnell-Luria, A. H., Ware, J. S., Hill, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19057 · Cited by 9,587 · see citing works
SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P., & Theis, F. J. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 · Cited by 8,881 · see citing works
A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells
Bernstein, B. E., Mikkelsen, T. S., Xie, X., Kamal, M., Huebert, D. J., Cuff, J., Fry, B., Meissner, A., Wernig, M., Plath, K., et al. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041 · Cited by 5,361 · see citing works
HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.03771 · Cited by 3,347 · see citing works
Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19
Liao, M., Liu, Y., Yuan, J., Wen, Y., Xu, G., Zhao, J., Cheng, L., Li, J., Wang, X., Wang, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0901-9 · Cited by 2,614 · see citing works
Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal–fetal interface in humans
Vento-Tormo, R., Efremova, M., Botting, R. A., Turco, M. Y., Vento-Tormo, M., Meyer, K. B., Park, J.-E., Stephenson, E., Polański, K., Goncalves, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0698-6 · Cited by 2,358 · see citing works
Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single-cell level
Ramachandran, P., Dobie, R., Wilson-Kanamori, J. R., Dora, E. F., Henderson, B. E. P., Luu, N. T., Portman, J. R., Matchett, K. P., Brice, M., Marwick, J. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1631-3 · Cited by 1,784 · see citing works
Cells of the adult human heart
Litviňuková, M., Talavera-López, C., Maatz, H., Reichart, D., Worth, C. L., Lindberg, E. L., Kanda, M., Polanski, K., Heinig, M., Lee, M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2797-4 · Cited by 1,729 · see citing works
Landscape and Dynamics of Single Immune Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Zhang, Q., He, Y., Luo, N., Patel, S. J., Han, Y., Gao, R., Modak, M., Carotta, S., Haslinger, C., Kind, D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.003 · Cited by 1,624 · see citing works
ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data
Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G., & Johnson, W. E. (2020) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa078 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
Single cell RNA sequencing of human liver reveals distinct intrahepatic macrophage populations
MacParland, S. A., Liu, J. C., Ma, X.-Z., Innes, B. T., Bartczak, A. M., Gage, B. K., Manuel, J., Khuu, N., Echeverri, J., Linares, I., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06318-7 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
PanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data
Franzén, O., Gan, L.-M., & Björkegren, J. L. M. (2019) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baz046 · Cited by 1,551 · see citing works
Baron, M., Veres, A., Wolock, S. L., Faust, A. L., Gaujoux, R., Vetere, A., Ryu, J. H., Wagner, B. K., Shen-Orr, S. S., Klein, A. M., et al. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.011 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
A single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response in patients with severe COVID-19
Wilk, A. J., Rustagi, A., Zhao, N. Q., Roque, J., Martínez-Colón, G. J., McKechnie, J. L., Ivison, G. T., Ranganath, T., Vergara, R., Hollis, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0944-y · Cited by 1,493 · see citing works
Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2022) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.10.001 · Cited by 1,422 · see citing works
Self-citationAdams, T. S., Schupp, J. C., Poli, S., Ayaub, E. A., Neumark, N., Ahangari, F., Chu, S. G., Raby, B. A., DeIuliis, G., Januszyk, M., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1983 · Cited by 1,420 · see citing works
Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Qiu, X. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.04554 · Cited by 1,420
Self-citationNorelli, M., Camisa, B., Barbiera, G., Falcone, L., Purevdorj, A., Genua, M., Sanvito, F., Ponzoni, M., Doglioni, C., Cristofori, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0036-4 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
Intra- and Inter-cellular Rewiring of the Human Colon during Ulcerative Colitis
Smillie, C. S., Biton, M., Ordovás-Montañés, J., Sullivan, K. M., Burgin, G., Graham, D. B., Herbst, R. H., Rogel, N., Slyper, M., Waldman, J., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.029 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation
Kang, H. M., Subramaniam, M., Targ, S., Nguyen, M., Maliskova, L., McCarthy, E., Wan, E., Wong, S., Byrnes, L., Lanata, C. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4042 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
Peng, J., Sun, B.-F., Chen, C.-Y., Zhou, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-S., Chen, H., Liu, L., Huang, D., Jiang, J., Cui, G.-S., et al. (2019) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-019-0195-y · Cited by 1,321 · see citing works
Kim, N., Kim, H. K., Lee, K., Hong, Y., Cho, J. H., Choi, J. W., Lee, J.-I., Suh, Y., Ku, B. M., Eum, H. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16164-1 · Cited by 1,290 · see citing works
Habermann, A. C., Gutierrez, A. J., Bui, L. T., Yahn, S. L., Winters, N. I., Calvi, C. L., Peter, L., Chung, M.-I., Taylor, C. J., Jetter, C., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1972 · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte
Plasschaert, L. W., Žilionis, R., Choo-Wing, R., Savova, V., Knehr, J., Roma, G., Klein, A. M., & Jaffe, A. B. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0394-6 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
The Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate Imprints an Antimicrobial Program in Macrophages
Schulthess, J., Pandey, S., Capitani, M., Rue-Albrecht, K. C., Arnold, I., Franchini, F., Chomka, A., Ilott, N. E., Johnston, D. G. W., Pires, E., et al. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab), Savas, P., Virassamy, B., Ye, C., Salim, A., Mintoff, C. P., Caramia, F., Salgado, R., Byrne, D. J., Teo, Z. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0078-7 · Cited by 992 · see citing works
(2020) · doi:10.1109/sc41405.2020.00024 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma
Vieira Braga, F. A., Kar, G., Berg, M., Carpaij, O. A., Polanski, K., Simon, L. M., Brouwer, S., Gomes, T., Hesse, L., Jiang, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0468-5 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Martin, J. P. D., Chang, C., Boschetti, G., Ungaro, R. C., Giri, M., Grout, J. A., Gettler, K., Chuang, L.-S. F., Nayar, S., Greenstein, A. J., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.008 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
COVID-19 immune features revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas
Ren, X., Wen, W., Fan, X., Hou, W., Su, B., Cai, P., Li, J., Liu, Y., Tang, F., Zhang, F., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.053 · Cited by 865 · see citing works
Self-citationColonic epithelial cell diversity in health and inflammatory bowel disease
Parikh, K., Antanaviciute, A., Fawkner-Corbett, D., Jagielowicz, M., Aulicino, A., Lagerholm, B. C., Davis, S. A., Kinchen, J. W., Chen, H. H., Alham, N. K., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0992-y · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis
Jäkel, S., Agirre, E., Mendanha Falcão, A., van Bruggen, D., Lee, K. W., Knuesel, I., Malhotra, D., ffrench-Constant, C., Williams, A., & Castelo-Branco, G. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0903-2 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Elevated Calprotectin and Abnormal Myeloid Cell Subsets Discriminate Severe from Mild COVID-19
Silvin, A., Chapuis, N., Dunsmore, G., Goubet, A.-G., Dubuisson, A., Derosa, L., Almire, C., Hénon, C., Kosmider, O., Droin, N., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.002 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Characterization of cell fate probabilities in single-cell data with Palantir
Setty, M., Kiseliovas, V., Levine, J., Gayoso, A., Mazutis, L., & Pe’er, D. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0068-4 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Lee, J. S., Park, S.-W., Jeong, H. W., Ahn, J. Y., Choi, S. J., Lee, H., Choi, B., Nam, S. K., Sa, M., Kwon, J., et al. (2020) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abd1554 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
A human cell atlas of fetal gene expression
Cao, J., O’Day, D. R., Pliner, H. A., Kingsley, P. D., Deng, M., Daza, R. M., Zager, M. A., Aldinger, K. A., Blecher-Gonen, R., Zhang, F., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba7721 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Structural Remodeling of the Human Colonic Mesenchyme in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Kinchen, J., Chen, H. H., Parikh, K., Antanaviciute, A., Jagielowicz, M., Fawkner-Corbett, D., Ashley, N., Cubitt, L., Mellado-Gomez, E., Attar, M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.067 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation
Park, J.-E., Botting, R. A., Conde, C. D., Popescu, D.-M., Lavaert, M., Kunz, D. J., Goh, I., Stephenson, E., Ragazzini, R., Tuck, E. J., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay3224 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Mutations in Sarcomere Protein Genes as a Cause of Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Kamisago, M., Sharma, S. D., DePalma, S. R., Solomon, S., Sharma, P., McDonough, B., Smoot, L., Mullen, M. P., Woolf, P. K., Wigle, E. D., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200012073432304 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
The adult human testis transcriptional cell atlas
Guo, J., Grow, E. J., Mlčochová, H., Maher, G. J., Lindskog, C., Nie, X., Guo, Y., Takei, Y., Yun, J., Cai, L., et al. (2018) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0099-2 · Cited by 715 · see citing works
Whole-Genome Analysis of Histone H3 Lysine 4 and Lysine 27 Methylation in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Pan, G., Tian, S., Nie, J., Yang, C., Ruotti, V., Wei, H., Jonsdottir, G. A., Stewart, R., & Thomson, J. A. (2007) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.003 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Identification of a mesenchymal progenitor cell hierarchy in adipose tissue
Merrick, D., Sakers, A., Irgebay, Z., Okada, C., Calvert, C., Morley, M. P., Percec, I., & Seale, P. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav2501 · Cited by 664 · see citing works
Cell Types of the Human Retina and Its Organoids at Single-Cell Resolution
Cowan, C. S., Renner, M., De Gennaro, M., Gross-Scherf, B., Goldblum, D., Hou, Y., Munz, M., Rodrigues, T. M., Krol, J., Szikra, T., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.013 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Titin mutations in iPS cells define sarcomere insufficiency as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy
Hinson, J. T., Chopra, A., Nafissi, N., Polacheck, W. J., Benson, C. C., Swist, S., Gorham, J., Yang, L., Schafer, S., Sheng, C. C., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa5458 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, H., Uchimura, K., Donnelly, E. L., Kirita, Y., Morris, S. A., & Humphreys, B. D. (2018) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.10.010 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Decoding human fetal liver haematopoiesis
Popescu, D.-M., Botting, R. A., Stephenson, E., Green, K., Webb, S., Jardine, L., Calderbank, E. F., Polanski, K., Goh, I., Efremova, M., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1652-y · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Hermann, B. P., Cheng, K., Singh, A., la Cruz, L. R.-D., Mutoji, K. N., Chen, I.-C., Gildersleeve, H. I. S., Lehle, J. D., Mayo, M., Westernströer, B., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.026 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomes of the human skin reveal age-related loss of fibroblast priming
Solé-Boldo, L., Raddatz, G., Schütz, S., Mallm, J.-P., Rippe, K., Lonsdorf, A. S., Rodríguez-Paredes, M., & Lyko, F. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0922-4 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
A single-cell atlas of the human healthy airways
Deprez, M., Zaragosi, L.-E., Truchi, M., Garcia, S. R., Arguel, M.-J., Lebrigand, K., Paquet, A., Pee’r, D., Marquette, C.-H., Leroy, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.21.884759 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Madissoon, E., Wilbrey-Clark, A., Miragaia, R. J., Saeb‐Parsy, K., Mahbubani, K. T. A., Georgakopoulos, N., Harding, P., Polański, K., Huang, N., Nowicki-Osuch, K., et al. (2019) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1906-x · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Zhang, P., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Xiao, S., Lai, X., Tan, A., Du, S., & Li, S. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.052 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Goveia, J., Rohlenová, K., Taverna, F., Treps, L., Conradi, L., Pircher, A., Geldhof, V., de Rooij, L. P. M. H., Kalucka, J. M., Sokol, L., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.001 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Czerniecki, S. M., Cruz, N. M., Harder, J. L., Menon, R., Annis, J., Otto, E. A., Gulieva, R. E., Islas, L. V., Kim, Y. K., Tran, L. M., et al. (2018) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.022 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of human adipose tissue identifies depot- and disease-specific cell types
Vijay, J., Gauthier, M., Biswell, R. L., Louiselle, D. A., Johnston, J. J., Cheung, W., Belden, B., Pramatarova, A., Biertho, L. D., Gibson, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-019-0152-6 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis reveals new evolutionary complexity in uveal melanoma
Durante, M. A., Rodriguez, D. A., Kurtenbach, S., Kuznetsoff, J. N., Sanchez, M. I., Decatur, C. L., Snyder, H., Feun, L. G., Livingstone, A. S., & Harbour, J. W. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14256-1 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Integrated single cell analysis of blood and cerebrospinal fluid leukocytes in multiple sclerosis
Schafflick, D., Xu, C. A., Hartlehnert, M., Cole, M. B., Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, A., Lautwein, T., Wolbert, J., Heming, M., Meuth, S. G., Kuhlmann, T., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14118-w · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Early B cell changes predict autoimmunity following combination immune checkpoint blockade
Das, R., Bar, N., Ferreira, M., Newman, A. M., Zhang, L., Bailur, J. K., Bacchiocchi, A., Kluger, H., Wei, W., Halaban, R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci96798 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Single-nucleus profiling of human dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Chaffin, M., Papangeli, I., Simonson, B., Akkad, A.-D., Hill, M. C., Arduini, A., Fleming, S. J., Melanson, M., Hayat, S., Kost-Alimova, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04817-8 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Self-citationSpatiotemporal immune zonation of the human kidney
Stewart, B. J., Ferdinand, J. R., Young, M. D., Mitchell, T. J., Loudon, K. W., Riding, A., Richoz, N., Frazer, G. L., Staniforth, J., Braga, F. A. V., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5031 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug–gene interactions
Wagner, A. H., Coffman, A. C., Ainscough, B. J., Spies, N. C., Skidmore, Z. L., Campbell, K. M., Krysiak, K., Pan, D., McMichael, J. F., Eldred, J. M., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1165 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Roles of Cardiac Transcription Factors in Cardiac Hypertrophy
Akazawa, H., & Komuro, I. (2003) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.0000072977.86706.23 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Song, W., Wang, J., Wang, T., Xiong, X., Qi, Z., Fu, W., Yang, X., & Chen, Y.-G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20191130 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Aryl hydrocarbon receptor Controls Monocyte Differentiation into dendritic Cells versus Macrophages
Goudot, C., Coillard, A., Villani, A.-C., Gueguen, P., Cros, A., Sarkizova, S., Tang-Huau, T.-L., Bohec, M., Baulande, S., Hacohen, N., et al. (2017) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.016 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Voigt, A. P., Mulfaul, K., Mullin, N. K., Flamme‐Wiese, M. J., Giacalone, J. C., Stone, E. M., Tucker, B. A., Scheetz, T. E., & Mullins, R. F. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914143116 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
The Phenotypes of Proliferating Glioblastoma Cells Reside on a Single Axis of Variation
Wang, L., Babikir, H. A., Müller, S., Yagnik, G., Shamardani, K., Catalan, F. L., Kohanbash, G., Alvarado, B., Lullo, E. D., Kriegstein, A. R., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0329 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Ruffin, A. T., Cillo, A. R., Tabib, T., Liu, A., Onkar, S., Kunning, S. R., Lampenfeld, C., Atiya, H. I., Abécassis, I., Kürten, C. H. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23355-x · Cited by 364 · see citing works
A cross-disorder dosage sensitivity map of the human genome
Collins, R. L., Glessner, J., Porcu, E., Lepamets, M., Brandon, R. C., Lauricella, C., Han, L., Morley, T. J., Niestroj, L., Ulirsch, J. C., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.036 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
A single‐cell transcriptome atlas of the adult human retina
Lukowski, S. W., Lo, C. Y.-W., Sharov, A. A., Nguyen, Q. H., Fang, L., Hung, S. S. C., Zhu, L., Zhang, T., Grünert, U., Nguyen, T., et al. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2018100811 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Li, Y., Ren, P., Dawson, A., Vasquez, H. G., Ageedi, W., Zhang, C., Luo, W., Chen, R., Li, Y., Kim, S., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.120.046528 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
The Neonatal and Adult Human Testis Defined at the Single-Cell Level
Sohni, A., Tan, K., Song, H.-W., Burow, D. A., de Rooij, D. G., Laurent, L. C., Hsieh, T.-C., Rabah, R. M., Hammoud, S. S., Vicini, E., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.045 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Menon, M., Mohammadi, S., Davila-Velderrain, J., Goods, B. A., Cadwell, T. D., Xing, Y., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A., Shalek, A. K., Love, J. C., Kellis, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12780-8 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Agarwal, D., Sandor, C., Volpato, V., Caffrey, T. M., Monzón‐Sandoval, J., Bowden, R. J., Alegre‐Abarrategui, J., Wade‐Martins, R., & Webber, C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17876-0 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptional profiles in human skeletal muscle
Rubenstein, A. B., Smith, G. R., Raue, U., Begue, G., Minchev, K., Ruf-Zamojski, F., Nair, V. D., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Zaslavsky, E., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57110-6 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
The Dynamic Transcriptional Cell Atlas of Testis Development during Human Puberty
Guo, J., Nie, X., Giebler, M., Mlčochová, H., Wang, Y., Grow, E. J., Kim, R. D., Tharmalingam, M. D., Matilionyte, G., Lindskog, C., et al. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.12.005 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Distinct microbial and immune niches of the human colon
James, K. R., Gomes, T., Elmentaite, R., Kumar, N., Gulliver, E. L., King, H. W., Stares, M. D., Bareham, B. R., Ferdinand, J. R., Petrova, V. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0602-z · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Disease Model of GATA4 Mutation Reveals Transcription Factor Cooperativity in Human Cardiogenesis
Ang, Y.-S., Rivas, R. N., Ribeiro, A. J. S., Srivas, R., Rivera, J., Stone, N. R., Pratt, K., Mohamed, T. M. A., Fu, J.-D., Spencer, C. I., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.033 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Sridhar, A., Hoshino, A., Finkbeiner, C., Chitsazan, A., Dai, L., Haugan, A. K., Eschenbacher, K. M., Jackson, D. L., Trapnell, C., Bermingham‐McDonogh, O., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.007 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Identifying Sarcomere Gene Mutations in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Personal History
Seidman, C. E., & Seidman, J. G. (2011) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.110.223834 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
A human circulating immune cell landscape in aging and COVID-19
Zheng, Y., Liu, X., Le, W., Xie, L., Li, H., Wen, W., Wang, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Ye, J., et al. (2020) · Protein & Cell · doi:10.1007/s13238-020-00762-2 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationPirruccello, J. P., Bick, A., Wang, M., Chaffin, M., Friedman, S., Yao, J., Guo, X., Venkatesh, B. A., Taylor, K. D., Post, W. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15823-7 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell RNA sequencing of human kidney
Liao, J., Yu, Z., Yang, C., Bao, M., Zou, C., Zhang, H., Liu, D., Li, T., Zhang, Q., Li, J., et al. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-019-0351-8 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Single cell dissection of plasma cell heterogeneity in symptomatic and asymptomatic myeloma
Ledergor, G., Weiner, A., Zada, M., Wang, S.-Y., Cohen, Y. C., Gatt, M. E., Snir, N., Magen, H., Koren-Michowitz, M., Herzog-Tzarfati, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0269-2 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Patil, V. S., Madrigal, A., Schmiedel, B. J., Clarke, J., O’Rourke, P., de Silva, A. D., Harris, E., Peters, B., Seumois, G., Weiskopf, D., et al. (2018) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aan8664 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Evaluation of variability in human kidney organoids
Phipson, B., Er, P. X., Combes, A. N., Forbes, T. A., Howden, S. E., Zappia, L., Yen, H.-J., Lawlor, K. T., Hale, L. J., Sun, J. Q. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0253-2 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Cumulus provides cloud-based data analysis for large-scale single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq
Li, B., Gould, J., Yang, Y., Sarkizova, S., Tabaka, M., Ashenberg, O., Rosen, Y., Slyper, M., Kowalczyk, M. S., Villani, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0905-x · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptome profiling of an adult human cell atlas of 15 major organs
He, S., Wang, L.-H., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Chen, H.-T., Xu, J.-H., Peng, W., Lin, G.-W., Wei, P.-P., Li, B., et al. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02210-0 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
High-performance web services for querying gene and variant annotation
Xin, J., Mark, A., Afrasiabi, C., Tsueng, G., Juchler, M., Gopal, N., Stupp, G. S., Putman, T., Ainscough, B. J., Griffith, O. L., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0953-9 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Zirkel, A., Nikolic, M., Sofiadis, K., Mallm, J.-P., Brackley, C. A., Gothe, H., Drechsel, O., Becker, C., Altmüller, J., Josipovic, N., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.030 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
A curated database reveals trends in single-cell transcriptomics
Svensson, V., da Veiga Beltrame, E., & Pachter, L. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa073 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Tang-Huau, T.-L., Gueguen, P., Goudot, C., Durand, M., Bohec, M., Baulande, S., Pasquier, B., Amigorena, S., & Segura, É. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04985-0 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Orozco, L. D., Chen, H.-H., Cox, C., Katschke, K. J., Arceo, R., Espiritu, C., Caplazi, P., Nghiem, S. S., Chen, Y., Modrusan, Z. D., et al. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.082 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Theodoris, C. V., Li, M., White, M. P., Liu, L., He, D., Pollard, K. S., Bruneau, B. G., & Srivastava, D. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.035 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Self-citationReprogramming roadmap reveals route to human induced trophoblast stem cells
Liu, X., Ouyang, J. F., Rossello, F. J., Tan, J. P., Davidson, K. C., Valdes, D. S., Schröder, J., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Knaupp, A. S., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2734-6 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationXin, Y., Dominguez Gutierrez, G., Okamoto, H., Kim, J., Lee, A.-H., Adler, C., Ni, M., Yancopoulos, G. D., Murphy, A. J., & Gromada, J. (2018) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db18-0365 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Takeda, A., Hollmén, M., Đermadi, D., Pan, J., Brulois, K., Kaukonen, R., Lönnberg, T., Boström, P., Koskivuo, I., Irjala, H., et al. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.027 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Dissecting intratumoral myeloid cell plasticity by single cell RNA-seq
Song, Q., Hawkins, G. A., Wudel, L., Chou, P., Forbes, E., Pullikuth, A. K., Liu, L., Jin, G., Craddock, L., Topaloglu, U., et al. (2019) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.2113 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Map of the Human and Mouse Bladders
Yu, Z., Liao, J., Chen, Y., Zou, C., Zhang, H., Cheng, J., Liu, D., Li, T., Zhang, Q., Li, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2019040335 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Single cell transcriptomic analysis of human pluripotent stem cell chondrogenesis
Wu, C., Dicks, A. R., Steward, N. S., Tang, R., Katz, D. B., Choi, Y., & Guilak, F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20598-y · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Balan, S., Arnold‐Schrauf, C., Abbas, A., Couespel, N., Savoret, J., Imperatore, F., Villani, A., Manh, T. V., Bhardwaj, N., & Dalod, M. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.033 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics reveals gene expression dynamics of human fetal kidney development
Hochane, M., van den Berg, P. R., Fan, X., Bérenger-Currias, N. M. L. P., Adegeest, E., Bialecka, M., Nieveen, M. C., Menschaart, M., Lopes, S. M. C. D. S., & Semrau, S. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000152 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
In Vitro and In Vivo Development of the Human Airway at Single-Cell Resolution
Miller, A. J., Yu, Q., Czerwinski, M. J., Tsai, Y.-H., Hein, R. F. C., Wu, A., Holloway, E. M., Walker, T., Glass, I. A., Treutlein, B., et al. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.033 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Shao, X., Yang, H., Zhuang, X., Liao, J., Yang, P., Cheng, J., Lu, X., Chen, H., & Fan, X. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab775 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Human germinal center transcriptional programs are de-synchronized in B cell lymphoma
Milpied, P. J., Cervera-Marzal, I., Mollichella, M.-L., Tesson, B. M., Brisou, G., Traverse‐Glehen, A., Salles, G., Spinelli, L., & Nadel, B. (2018) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0181-4 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Single-cell analysis of progenitor cell dynamics and lineage specification in the human fetal kidney
Menon, R., Otto, E. A., Kokoruda, A., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Yoon, E., Chen, Y., Troyanskaya, O. G., Spence, J. R., Kretzler, M., et al. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.164038 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Discovery of specialized NK cell populations infiltrating human melanoma metastases
de Andrade, L. F., Lu, Y., Luoma, A., Ito, Y., Pan, D., Pyrdol, J. W., Yoon, C. H., Yuan, G., & Wucherpfennig, K. W. (2019) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.133103 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
ZeRO-Offload: Democratizing Billion-Scale Model Training
Ren, J., Rajbhandari, S., Aminabadi, R. Y., Ruwase, O., Yang, S., Zhang, M., Li, D., & He, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.06840 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling
Henighan, T., Kaplan, J., Katz, M., Chen, M., Hesse, C., Jackson, J., Jun, H., Brown, T. B., Dhariwal, P., Gray, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14701 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Paik, D. T., Tian, L., Lee, J., Sayed, N., Chen, I. Y., Rhee, S., Rhee, J., Kim, Y., Wirka, R. C., Buikema, J. W., et al. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.312913 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Mitochondrial Function and Dysfunction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Ramaccini, D., Montoya-Uribe, V., Aan, F. J., Modesti, L., Potes, Y., Wieckowski, M. R., Krga, I., Glibetić, M., Pinton, P., Giorgi, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.624216 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Hurley, K., Ding, J., Villacorta-Martín, C., Herriges, M. J., Jacob, A., Vedaie, M., Alysandratos, K., Sun, Y. L., Lin, C. H., Werder, R. B., et al. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.12.009 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Nakagawa, O., Arnold, M., Nakagawa, M., Hamada, H., Shelton, J. M., Kusano, H., Harris, T. M., Childs, G., Campbell, K. P., Richardson, J. A., et al. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1338705 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Direct pericyte-to-neuron reprogramming via unfolding of a neural stem cell-like program
Karow, M., Camp, J. G., Falk, S., Gerber, T., Pataskar, A., Santel, M., Kageyama, J., Brazovskaja, A., Garding, A., Fan, W., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0168-3 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Single-Cell Heterogeneity Analysis and CRISPR Screen Identify Key β-Cell-Specific Disease Genes
Fang, Z., Weng, C., Li, H., Tao, R., Mai, W., Liu, X., Lu, L., Lai, S., Duan, Q., Álvarez‐González, C. A., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.043 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationHe, J., Jing, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, L., Qian, X., Zeng, Y., Sun, Y., Zhang, H., Bai, Z., Li, Z., et al. (2021) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00467-z · Cited by 124 · see citing works
TEAD family transcription factors in development and disease
Currey, L., Thor, S., & Piper, M. (2021) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.196675 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into antigen-presenting dendritic cells
Rosa, F. A., Pires, C. F., Kurochkin, I., Ferreira, A. G., Gomes, A. M., Palma, L. G., Shaiv, K., Solanas, L., Azenha, C. D. J., Papatsenko, D., et al. (2018) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aau4292 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Modeling Human TBX5 Haploinsufficiency Predicts Regulatory Networks for Congenital Heart Disease
Kathiriya, I. S., Rao, K. S., Iacono, G., Devine, W. P., Blair, A. P., Hota, S. K., Lai, M. H., Garay, B. I., Thomas, R., Gong, H. Z., et al. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.11.020 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Su, C., Lv, Y., Lu, W., Yu, Z., Ye, Y., Guo, B., Liu, D., Yan, H., Li, T., Zhang, Q., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.719564 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Lieberman, Y., Rokach, L., & Shay, T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205499 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Paracrine signalling by cardiac calcitonin controls atrial fibrogenesis and arrhythmia
Moreira, L. M., Takawale, A. R., Hulsurkar, M. M., Menassa, D. A., Antanaviciute, A., Lahiri, S. K., Mehta, N., Evans, N., Psarros, C., Robinson, P. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2890-8 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
NKX2-5 regulates human cardiomyogenesis via a HEY2 dependent transcriptional network
Anderson, D. J., Kaplan, D. I., Bell, K. M., Koutsis, K., Haynes, J. M., Mills, R. J., Phelan, D., Qian, E. L., Leitoguinho, A. R., Arasaratnam, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03714-x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease
Theodoris, C. V., Zhou, P., Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Nishino, T., Huang, Y., Kostina, A., Ranade, S. S., Gifford, C. A., Uspenskiy, V., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd0724 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationSelewa, A., Dohn, R., Eckart, H., Lozano, S., Xie, B., Gauchat, E., Elorbany, R., Rhodes, K., Burnett, J., Gilad, Y., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58327-6 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Tran, T., Lindström, N. O., Ransick, A., Brandine, G. D. S., Guo, Q., Kim, A. D., Dér, B., Peti‐Peterdi, J., Smith, A. D., Thornton, M. E., et al. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.001 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Determinants of transcription factor regulatory range
Chen, C.-H., Zheng, R., Tokheim, C., Dong, X., Fan, J., Wan, C., Tang, Q., Brown, M., Liu, J. S., Meyer, C. A., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16106-x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationExpression of Foxm1 Transcription Factor in Cardiomyocytes Is Required for Myocardial Development
Bolte, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, I.-C., Kalin, T. V., Molkentin, J. D., & Kalinichenko, V. V. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022217 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived SCGB3A2+ Airway Epithelium
McCauley, K. B., Alysandratos, K., Jacob, A., Hawkins, F. J., Caballero, I. S., Vedaie, M., Yang, W., Slovik, K. J., Morley, M. P., Carraro, G., et al. (2018) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.013 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Expansion of hedgehog disrupts mesenchymal identity and induces emphysema phenotype
Wang, C., de Mochel, N. R., Christenson, S. A., Cassandras, M., Moon, R. H., Brumwell, A. N., Byrnes, L. E., Li, A., Yokosaki, Y., Shan, P., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci99435 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Adult Human Glioblastomas Harbor Radial Glia-like Cells
Wang, R., Sharma, R., Shen, X., Laughney, A. M., Funato, K., Clark, P. J., Shpokayte, M., Morgenstern, P. F., Navare, M., Xu, Y., et al. (2020) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.01.007 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
McCracken, I. R., Taylor, R. S., Kok, F. O., de la Cuesta, F., Dobie, R., Henderson, B. E. P., Mountford, J. C., Caudrillier, A., Henderson, N. C., Ponting, C. P., et al. (2019) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz351 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Ho, D., Yan, L., Iwatsubo, K., Vatner, D. E., & Vatner, S. F. (2010) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-010-9183-5 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Lu, Y., Jia, L., Zheng, Z., Tran, E., Robbins, P. F., & Rosenberg, S. A. (2019) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-19-0299 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Single-Cell Mapping of Progressive Fetal-to-Adult Transition in Human Naive T Cells
Bunis, D. G., Bronevetsky, Y., Krow‐Lucal, E., Bhakta, N. R., Kim, C. C., Nerella, S., Jones, N. G., Mendoza, V. F., Bryson, Y. J., Gern, J. E., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108573 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Rasouli, J., Casella, G., Yoshimura, S., Zhang, W., Xiao, D., Garifallou, J., Gonzalez, M. V., Wiedeman, A., Kus, A., Mari, E. R., et al. (2020) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.aba9953 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language ProcessingPreprint
Lhoest, Q., del Moral, A. V., Jernite, Y., Thakur, A., von Platen, P., Patil, S. S., Chaumond, J., Drame, M., Plu, J., Tunstall, L., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.02846 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The t -digest: Efficient estimates of distributions
Dunning, T. E. (2020) · Software Impacts · doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2020.100049 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Xing, Q. R., El Farran, C. A., Gautam, P., Chuah, Y. S., Warrier, T., Toh, C. X. D., Kang, N. Y., Sugii, S., Chang, Y. T., Xu, J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1190 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Single cell RNA sequencing of stem cell-derived retinal ganglion cells
Daniszewski, M., Senabouth, A., Nguyen, Q. H., Crombie, D. E., Lukowski, S. W., Kulkarni, T., Sluch, V. M., Jabbari, J. S., Chamling, X., Zack, D. J., et al. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.13 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zhou, L., Adrianto, I., Wang, J., Wu, X., Datta, I., & Mi, Q. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00384 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Bailur, J. K., Mehta, S. S., Zhang, L., Neparidze, N., Parker, T. L., Bar, N., Anderson, T. B., Xu, M. L., Dhodapkar, K. M., & Dhodapkar, M. V. (2017) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012732 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Papa, L., Zimran, E., Djedaini, M., Ge, Y., Özbek, U., Sebra, R., Sealfon, S. C., & Hoffman, R. (2018) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024273 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
HIPred: an integrative approach to predicting haploinsufficient genes
Shihab, H. A., Rogers, M. F., Campbell, C., & Gaunt, T. R. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx028 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Peng, H., Roy, N. B. A., de la Fuente, J., Wang, G., Thongjuea, S., Clark, K., Roy, A., Psaila, B., Ashley, N., Harrington, Y., et al. (2019) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2019002301 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Integrative inference of brain cell similarities and differences from single-cell genomicsPreprint
Welch, J. D., Kozareva, V., Ferreira, A. N., Vanderburg, C. R., Martin, C., & Macosko, E. Z. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/459891 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Bolte, C., Zhang, Y., York, A., Kalin, T. V., Schultz, J. E. J., Molkentin, J. D., & Kalinichenko, V. V. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048713 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
CCR10+ epithelial cells from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lungs drive remodeling
Habiel, D. M., Espíndola, M. S., Jones, I. C., Coelho, A. L., Stripp, B. R., & Hogaboam, C. M. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.122211 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Daniszewski, M., Nguyen, Q. H., Chy, H. S., Singh, V., Crombie, D. E., Kulkarni, T., Liang, H. H., Sivakumaran, P., Lidgerwood, G. E., Hernández, D., et al. (2018) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2018.08.016 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
iMyoblasts for ex vivo and in vivo investigations of human myogenesis and disease modeling
Guo, D., Daman, K., Chen, J. J., Shi, M.-J., Yan, J., Matijasevic, Z., Rickard, A. M., Bennett, M. H., Kiselyov, A., Zhou, H., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.70341 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Wang, L., Chao, M., Han, R.-R., Li, L., Dong, L., Chen, F., Jin, M.-Z., Gao, L., Wang, Y., Feng, D., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000002088 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Hierarchy of Proliferative and Migratory Keratinocytes Maintains the Tympanic Membrane
Frumm, S. M., Yu, K. S., Chang, J. T.-C., Artichoker, J., Scaria, S. M., Lee, K. P., Byrnes, L. E., Sneddon, J. B., & Tward, A. D. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.006 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ensemble learning for classifying single-cell data and projection across reference atlases
Wang, L., Catalan, F. L., Shamardani, K., Babikir, H. A., & Diaz, A. A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa137 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Characterization of Human Dosage-Sensitive Transcription Factor Genes
Ni, Z., Zhou, X., Aslam, S., & Niu, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01208 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mende, N., Bastos, H. P., Santoro, A., Sham, K., Mahbubani, K. T. A., Curd, A., Takizawa, H., Wilson, N. K., Göttgens, B., Saeb‐Parsy, K., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.01.26.919753 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wang, L., Dai, J., Han, R.-R., Dong, L., Feng, D., Zhu, G., Guo, W., Wang, Y., Chao, M., Jin, M., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2019.12.30.890517 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
scGPT: Towards Building a Foundation Model for Single-Cell Multi-omics Using Generative AI
Cui, H., Wang, C., Maan, H., Pang, K., Luo, F., & Wang, B. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.30.538439 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data
Xu, H., Usuyama, N., Bagga, J., Zhang, S., Rao, R., Naumann, T., Wong, C., Gero, Z., González, J., Gu, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07441-w · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Zhang, P., Zhang, D., Zhou, W., Wang, L., Wang, B., Zhang, T., & Li, S. (2023) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbad518 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Large-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics
Hao, M., Gong, J., Zeng, X., Liu, C., Guo, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, T., Ma, J., Zhang, X., & Song, L. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02305-7 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
“We then estimated the performance of various scale xTrimoGene architecture models with parameter sizes equivalent to previous transformer-based models 13–15 , and compared with scVI 25 (Supplementary Note 2).”
Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo
Nguyen, E., Poli, M., Durrant, M. G., Kang, B., Katrekar, D., Li, D. B., Bartie, L. J., Thomas, A. W., King, S. H., Brixi, G., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9336 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Program, C. C. S., Abdulla, S., Aevermann, B., Assis, P., Badajoz, S., Bell, S. M., Bezzi, E., Cakir, B., Chaffer, J., Chambers, S., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae1142 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities
Bunne, C., Roohani, Y., Rosen, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, X., Roed, M., Alexandrov, T., AlQuraishi, M., Brennan, P., Burkhardt, D. B., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.015 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
“59,78,79 Using AI algorithms to integrate different data modalities collected with sequencing and imaging technologies creates a multi-view model of the cell that can be both dynamic and predictive.”
Self-citationMass-spectrometry-based proteomics: from single cells to clinical applications
Guo, T., Steen, J. A. J., & Mann, M. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08584-0 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Gulati, G. S., D'Silva, J. P., Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Newman, A. M. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00768-2 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Empowering biomedical discovery with AI agents
Gao, S., Fang, A., Huang, Y., Giunchiglia, V., Noori, A., Schwarz, J. R., Ektefaie, Y., Kondic, J., & Zitnik, M. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.022 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
RNAi-based drug design: considerations and future directions
Tang, Q., & Khvorova, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-024-00912-9 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Ahlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02772-6 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Machine learning in preclinical drug discovery
Catacutan, D. B., Alexander, J., Arnold, A., & Stokes, J. M. (2024) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-024-01679-1 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Universal cell embedding provides a foundation model for cell biology
Rosen, Y., Roohani, Y., Agrawal, A., Samotorcan, L., Quake, S. R., & Leskovec, J. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10689-z · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Xie, L. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.030 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
A single-cell time-lapse of mouse prenatal development from gastrula to birth
Qiu, C., Martin, B., Welsh, I. C., Daza, R. M., Le, T.-M., Huang, X., Nichols, E. K., Taylor, M. L., Fulton, O., O’Day, D. R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07069-w · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Goles, M., Sanchez–Daza, A., Cabas-Mora, G., Varón, L. S., Sepúlveda-Yáñez, J., Anvari-Kazemabad, H., Davari, M. D., Uribe-Paredes, R., Olivera‐Nappa, Á., Navarrete, M. A., et al. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae275 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
A cell atlas foundation model for scalable search of similar human cells
Heimberg, G., Kuo, T. C.-Y., DePianto, D. J., Salem, O., Heigl, T., Diamant, N., Scalia, G., Biancalani, T., Turley, S. J., Rock, J. R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08411-y · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Transformers in single-cell omics: a review and new perspectives
Szałata, A., Hrovatin, K., Becker, S., Tejada-Lapuerta, A., Cui, H., Wang, B., & Theis, F. J. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02353-z · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Simple and effective embedding model for single-cell biology built from ChatGPT
Chen, Y. T., & Zou, J. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01284-6 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
The Human Cell Atlas from a cell census to a unified foundation model
Rood, J., Wynne, S., Robson, L., Hupalowska, A., Randell, J., Teichmann, S. A., & Regev, A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08338-4 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics
Miller, C., Portlock, T., Nyaga, D. M., & O'Sullivan, J. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2024.1457619 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Lin, M., Guo, J., Gu, Z., Tang, W., Tao, H., You, S., Jia, D., Sun, Y., & Jia, P. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06425-2 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Yang, X., Liu, G., Feng, G., Bu, D., Wang, P., Jiang, J., Chen, S., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y., Man, Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.26.559542 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Yang, X., Liu, G., Feng, G., Bu, D., Wang, P., Jiang, J., Chen, S., Yang, Q., Miao, H., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-024-01034-y · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Transformers and genome language models
Consens, M. E., Dufault, C., Wainberg, M., Forster, D., Karimzadeh, M., Goodarzi, H., Theis, F. J., Moses, A. M., & Wang, B. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01007-9 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Program, C. S.-C. B., Abdulla, S., Aevermann, B., Assis, P., Badajoz, S., Bell, S. M., Bezzi, E., Cakir, B., Chaffer, J., Chambers, S., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.30.563174 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Spatially resolved mapping of cells associated with human complex traits
Song, L., Chen, W., Hou, J., Guo, M., & Yang, J. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08757-x · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Rood, J. E., Hupalowska, A., & Regev, A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.035 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Chen, V., Yang, M., Cui, W., Kim, J. S., Talwalkar, A., & Ma, J. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02359-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Spatial oncology: Translating contextual biology to the clinic
Gong, D. H., Arbesfeld-Qiu, J. M., Perrault, E. N., Bae, J. W., & Hwang, W. L. (2024) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.09.001 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Towards multimodal foundation models in molecular cell biology
Cui, H., Tejada-Lapuerta, A., Brbić, M., Sáez-Rodríguez, J., Cristea, S., Goodarzi, H., Lotfollahi, M., Theis, F. J., & Wang, B. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08710-y · Cited by 131 · see citing works
A foundation model of transcription across human cell types
(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08391-z · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Foundation Model for Advancing Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions
He, Y., Huang, F., Jiang, X., Nie, Y., Wang, M., Wang, J., & Chen, H. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2024.3496744 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Digital twins as global learning health and disease models for preventive and personalized medicine
Li, X., Loscalzo, J., Mahmud, A. K. M. F., Aly, D. M., Rzhetsky, A., Žitnik, M., & Benson, M. (2025) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-025-01435-7 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Harnessing network pharmacology in drug discovery: an integrated approach
Joshi, C. P., Baldi, A., Kumar, N., & Pradhan, J. (2024) · Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00210-024-03625-3 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
A visual–omics foundation model to bridge histopathology with spatial transcriptomics
Chen, W., Zhang, P., Tran, T. N., Xiao, Y., Li, S., Shah, V. V., Cheng, H., Brannan, K. W., Youker, K., Lai, L., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02707-1 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“As single-cell foundation models such as GeneFormer 26 , scGPT 57 and scFoundation 27 can also provide the transcriptomic embeddings, to further evaluate the approach, we replaced OmiCLIP gene expression embeddings with those from single-cell foundation models GeneFormer, scGPT and scFoundation.”
InfluentialCurrent and future directions in network biology
Žitnik, M., Li, M. M., Wells, A., Glass, K., Gysi, D. M., Krishnan, A., Murali, T. M., Predrag Radivojac, A., Roy, S., Baudot, A., et al. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae099 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Large Scale Foundation Model on Single-cell Transcriptomics
Hao, M., Gong, J., Zeng, X., Liu, C., Guo, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, T., Ma, J., Song, L., & Zhang, X. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.29.542705 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models
Kedzierska, K. Z., Crawford, L., Amini, A. P., & Lu, A. X. (2025) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03574-x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“In this work, we perform zero-shot evaluations of two popular proposed single-cell foundation models, Geneformer [6] and scGPT [7] (Fig.”
Spatial multi-omics: novel tools to study the complexity of cardiovascular diseases
Kießling, P., & Kuppe, C. (2024) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-024-01282-y · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Tissue-resident memory CD8 T cell diversity is spatiotemporally imprinted
Reina‐Campos, M., Monell, A., Ferry, A., Luna, V., Cheung, K. P., Galletti, G., Scharping, N. E., Takehara, K. K., Quon, S., Challita, P. P., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08466-x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey of Foundation Models in Medicine
Khan, W., Leem, S., See, K. B., Wong, J. K., Zhang, S., & Fang, R. (2025) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2025.3531360 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Immune digital twins for complex human pathologies: applications, limitations, and challenges
Niarakis, A., Laubenbacher, R., An, G. C., Ilan, Y., Fisher, J., Flobak, Å., Reiche, K., Martínez, M. R., Geris, L., Ladeira, L., et al. (2024) · npj Systems Biology and Applications · doi:10.1038/s41540-024-00450-5 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Ghosh, S., Zhao, X., Alim, M., Brudno, M., & Bhat, M. (2024) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331740 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with State
Adduri, A. K., Gautam, D., Bevilacqua, B., Naghipourfar, M., Imran, A., Shah, R., Teyssier, N., Verma, R., Carpenter, C., Eraslan, B., et al. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.07.052 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Nicheformer: a foundation model for single-cell and spatial omics
Tejada-Lapuerta, A., Schaar, A. C., Gutgesell, R., Palla, G., Halle, L., Minaeva, M., Vornholz, L., Dony, L., Drummer, F., Richter, T., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02814-z · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Partners, C. M. A., Bào, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhao, W., Xiao, J., Song, S., He, S., Zhang, G., Li, Y., Zhao, G., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf1172 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
CellFM: a large-scale foundation model pre-trained on transcriptomics of 100 million human cells
Zeng, Y., Xie, J., Shangguan, N., Wei, Z., Li, W., Su, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Fang, N., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59926-5 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Ge, S., Sun, S., Xu, H., Cheng, Q. S., & Ren, Z. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf136 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Large language models for drug discovery and development
Zheng, Y., Koh, H. Y., Ju, J., Yang, M., May, L. T., Webb, G. I., Li, L., Pan, S., & Church, G. M. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101346 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Targeted design of synthetic enhancers for selected tissues in the Drosophila embryo
de Almeida, B. P., Schaub, C., Pagani, M., Secchia, S., Furlong, E. E. M., & Stark, A. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06905-9 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Pretraining a foundation model for generalizable fluorescence microscopy-based image restoration
Ma, C., Tan, W., He, R., & Yan, B. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02244-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Democratizing protein language models with parameter-efficient fine-tuning
Sledzieski, S., Kshirsagar, M., Baek, M., Dodhia, R., Lavista Ferres, J., & Berger, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2405840121 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
CellPLM: Pre-training of Cell Language Model Beyond Single CellsPreprint
Wen, H., Tang, W., Dai, X., Ding, J., Jin, W., Xie, Y., & Tang, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.03.560734 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Yuan, M., Bao, P., Yuan, J., Shen, Y., Chen, Z., Xie, Y., Zhao, J., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2024) · Medicine Plus · doi:10.1016/j.medp.2024.100030 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
The future of rapid and automated single-cell data analysis using reference mapping
Lotfollahi, M., Hao, Y., Theis, F. J., & Satija, R. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.009 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Contextual AI models for single-cell protein biology
Li, M. M., Huang, Y., Sumathipala, M. G., Liang, M. Q., Valdeolivas, A., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Liao, K. P., Marbach, D., & Žitnik, M. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02341-3 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Language models for biological research: a primer
Simon, E. P., Swanson, K., & Zou, J. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02354-y · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Saunders, R. A., Allen, W. E., Pan, X., Sandhu, J., Lu, J., Lau, T. K., Smolyar, K., Sullivan, Z. A., Dulac, C. G., Weissman, J. S., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.05.022 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single‐Cell Data Analysis
Liu, T., Li, K., Wang, Y., Li, H., & Zhao, H. (2026) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202514490 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis
Liu, J., Cen, X., Yi, C., Wang, F.-A., Ding, J., Cheng, J., Wu, Q., Gai, B., Zhou, Y., He, R., et al. (2025) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Benchmarking algorithms for single-cell multi-omics prediction and integration
Hu, Y., Wan, S., Luo, Y., Li, Y., Wu, T., Deng, W., Jiang, C., Jiang, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02429-w · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Li, H., Han, Z., Sun, Y., Wang, F., Hu, P., Gao, Y., Bai, X., Peng, S., Ren, C., Xu, X., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50426-6 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Integrated single-cell atlas of human atherosclerotic plaques
Traeuble, K., Munz, M., Pauli, J., Sachs, N., Vafadarnejad, E., Carrillo‐Roa, T., Mäegdefessel, L., Kastner, P., & Heinig, M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63202-x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Buess, L., Keicher, M., Navab, N., Maier, A., & Arasteh, S. T. (2025) · Biomedical Engineering Letters · doi:10.1007/s13534-025-00497-1 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Advances and applications in single-cell and spatial genomics
Wang, J., Ye, F., Chai, H., Jiang, Y., Wang, T., Ran, X., Xia, Q., Xu, Z., Fu, Y., Zhang, G., et al. (2024) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-024-2770-x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Wang, B., Zhang, T., Liu, Q., Sutcharitchan, C., Zhou, Z., Zhang, D., & Li, S. (2024) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2024.101144 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Attention-based deep learning models for predicting anomalous shock of wastewater treatment plants
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Li, C., Duan, H., & Wang, W. (2025) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2025.123192 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Fang, S., Xu, M., Cao, L., Liu, X., Bezulj, M., Tan, L., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., Xia, T., Guo, L., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58079-9 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationAhlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.16.613342 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
scTab: Scaling cross-tissue single-cell annotation models
Fischer, F., Fischer, D. S., Mukhin, R. S., Isaev, A. V., Biederstedt, E., Villani, A., & Theis, F. J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51059-5 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Schäfer, P. S. L., Dimitrov, D., Villablanca, E. J., & Sáez-Rodríguez, J. (2024) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-024-01768-2 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
SynergyX: a multi-modality mutual attention network for interpretable drug synergy prediction
Guo, Y., Hu, H., Chen, W., Yin, H., Wu, J., Hsieh, C., He, Q., & Cao, J. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae015 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Cell2Sentence: Teaching Large Language Models the Language of BiologyPreprint
Levine, D. M., Rizvi, S. A., Lévy, S., Pallikkavaliyaveetil, N., Zhang, D., Chen, X., Ghadermarzi, S., Wu, R., Zheng, Z., Vrkic, I., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.11.557287 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Big data and deep learning for RNA biology
Hwang, H., Jeon, H., Yeo, N., & Baek, D. (2024) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-024-01243-w · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single-cell Data Analysis
Liu, T., Li, K., Wang, Y., Li, H., & Zhao, H. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.08.555192 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Li, J., Zhang, D., Yang, F., Zhang, Q., Pan, S., Zhao, X., Zhang, Q., Han, Y., Yang, J., Wang, K., et al. (2024) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100975 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Progress and opportunities of foundation models in bioinformatics
Li, Q., Hu, Z., Wang, Y., Li, L., Fan, Y., King, I., Jia, G., Wang, S., Song, L., & Li, Y. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae548 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Assessing the limits of zero-shot foundation models in single-cell biology
Kedzierska, K. Z., Crawford, L., Amini, A. P., & Lu, A. X. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.16.561085 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“These include scBERT [4], Geneformer [5], scGPT [6], tGPT [7], scFoundation [8], SCimilarity [9], GET [10], GeneCompass [11], and GENEPT [12] which all present themselves as general models applicable to diverse analyses.”
BackgroundMethodscPRINT: pre-training on 50 million cells allows robust gene network predictions
Kalfon, J., Samaran, J., Gabriel Peyré, A., & Cantini, L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58699-1 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Large language models in plant biology
Lam, H. Y. I., Ong, X. E., & Mutwil, M. (2024) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2024.04.013 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
scGPT-spatial: Continual Pretraining of Single-Cell Foundation Model for Spatial TranscriptomicsPreprint
Wang, C. X., Cui, H., Zhang, A., Xie, R., Goodarzi, H., & Wang, B. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.05.636714 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
TranscriptFormer: A generative cell atlas across 1.5 billion years of evolution
Pearce, J. D., Simmonds, S. E., Mahmoudabadi, G., Krishnan, L., Palla, G., Istrate, A.-M., Tarashansky, A. J., Nelson, B. E., Valenzuela, O., Li, D., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aec8514 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
AI-driven high-throughput droplet screening of cell-free gene expression
Zhu, J., Meng, Y., Gao, W., Yang, S., Zhu, W., Ji, X., Zhai, X., Liu, W., Luo, Y., Ling, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58139-0 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
New horizons at the interface of artificial intelligence and translational cancer research
Yates, J., & Allen, E. M. V. (2025) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.03.018 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
scDiffusion: conditional generation of high-quality single-cell data using diffusion model
Luo, E., Hao, M., Wei, L., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae518 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Liu, X. F., Tao, Y., Cai, Z., Bao, P., Ma, H., Li, K., Li, M., Zhu, Y., & Lu, Z. J. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae316 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal learning enables chat-based exploration of single-cell data
Schaefer, M., Peneder, P., Malzl, D., Lombardo, S. D., Peycheva, M., Burton, J., Hakobyan, A., Sharma, V., Krausgruber, T., Sin, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02857-9 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Advancing bioinformatics with language models: components, applications, and perspectives
Liu, J., Yang, M., Yu, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., Li, K., & Zhou, X. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag367 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Ma, C., Zhang, H., Rao, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, B., Sun, Z., Song, Z., Gao, Y., Cui, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02198-6 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationTheodorakis, N., Feretzakis, G., Tzelves, L., Paxinou, E., Hitas, C., Vamvakou, G., Verykios, V. S., & Nikolaou, M. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14090931 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tracking cell-type-specific temporal dynamics in human and mouse brains
Lu, Z., Zhang, M., Lee, J., Sziraki, A., Anderson, S., Zhang, Z., Xu, Z., Jiang, W., Ge, S., Nelson, P. T., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.042 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
CFSSynergy: Combining Feature-Based and Similarity-Based Methods for Drug Synergy Prediction
Rafiei, F., Zeraati, H., Abbasi, K., Razzaghi, P., Ghasemi, J. B., Parsaeian, M., & Masoudi‐Nejad, A. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01486 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Huang, A. C., Hsieh, T.-H. S., Zhu, J., Michuda, J., Teng, A., Kim, S., Rumsey, E. M., Lam, S. K., Anigbogu, I., Wright, P., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.11.659105 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Scaling Large Language Models for Next-Generation Single-Cell AnalysisPreprint
Rizvi, S. A., Levine, D., Patel, A. M., Zhang, S., Wang, E., Perry, C. J., Vrkic, I., Constante, N. M., Fu, Z., He, S., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.14.648850 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Machine Learning at the Grid Edge: Data-Driven Impedance Models for Model-Free Inverters
Li, Y., Liao, Y., Zhao, L., Chen, M., Wang, X., Nordström, L., Mittal, P., & Poor, H. V. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2024.3399776 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Chakraborty, C., Bhattacharya, M., Pal, S., Chatterjee, S., Das, A., & Lee, S. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2025.02.011 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Dai, Q., Xu, Y., Wu, S., Cheng, M., & Zhao, B. T. (2025) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-01082-6 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction
Csendes, G., Sanz, G., Szalay, K. Z., & Szalai, B. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11600-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“To address these challenges, several Transformer-based, foundation cell models have emerged recently [4, 6, 7].”
- Authors
- Theodoris, C. V., Xiao, L., Chopra, A., Chaffin, M. D., Al Sayed, Z. R., Hill, M. C., Mantineo, H., Brydon, E. M., Zeng, Z., Liu, X. S., & Ellinor, P. T.
- Affiliations
- Broad Institute (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Theodoris, Christina V.
- Ellinor, Patrick T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-05-31
- Volume
- 618
- Issue
- 7965
- Pages
- 616-624
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC10949956
- OpenAlex
- W4378838672
- Cited by
- 1,193
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 488 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 257 · 2023: 46
- FWCI
- 105.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association (1R01HL092577, 18SFRN34110082, 965286, MAESTRIA 965286, 20CDA35260081)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Pfizer
- Bayer
- MyoKardia
- European Commission (965286)
- National Institutes of Health (965,286, 18SFRN34110082)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL092577, R01HL157635, R01HL139731)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007748)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- transfer learning, Geneformer, gene regulatory networks, single-cell transcriptomics, attention-based deep learning, self-supervised pre-training, chromatin dynamics, cardiomyopathy, therapeutic target discovery, network biology
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Biology, Chromatin, Humans, Cardiomyopathies, Neural Networks, Computer, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review