Cited by 1,262Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology

Open access
Theodoris, Christina V., Xiao, Ling, Chopra, Anant, Chaffin, Mark D., Al Sayed, Zeina R., Hill, Matthew C., Mantineo, Helene, Brydon, Elizabeth M. +3 more·2023·Nature

Abstract

Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues. Recently, transfer learning has revolutionized fields such as natural language understanding 1,2 and computer vision 3 by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards a vast array of downstream tasks with limited task-specific data. Here, we developed a context-aware, attention-based deep learning model, Geneformer, pretrained on a large-scale corpus of about 30 million single-cell transcriptomes to enable context-specific predictions in settings with limited data in network biology. During pretraining, Geneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the attention weights of the model in a completely self-supervised manner. Fine-tuning towards a diverse panel of downstream tasks relevant to chromatin and network dynamics using limited task-specific data demonstrated that Geneformer consistently boosted predictive accuracy. Applied to disease modelling with limited patient data, Geneformer identified candidate therapeutic targets for cardiomyopathy. Overall, Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model from which fine-tuning towards a broad range of downstream applications can be pursued to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06139-9

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

51 of 63 cited sources checked · 31 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    Genes known to be highly context-dependent, such as NOTCH receptors, showed more variability in their embeddings across variable cell types compared to the known housekeeping gene GAPDH.

    “Furthermore, genes known to be highly context-dependent, such as NOTCH receptors, showed more variability in their embeddings across variable cell types14 compared to the known housekeeping gene GAPDH (Extended Data Fig. 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source

      The Results sections describe cell-type-specific gene expression in human aortic tissue, but the passages found do not discuss NOTCH receptors as context-dependent genes. Searches for NOTCH, GAPDH, and embedding variability found no passage addressing the cited point. The embedding comparison is attributed to the citing paper’s Extended Data Fig. 3, not clearly to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Mapping the gene regulatory networks that drive disease progression enables screening for molecules that correct the network by normalizing core regulatory elements, rather than targeting peripheral downstream effectors that may not be disease modifying.

    “Mapping the gene regulatory networks that drive disease progression enables screening for molecules that correct the network by normalizing core regulatory elements, rather than targeting peripheral downstream effectors that may not be disease modifying4,5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell 160, 1072–1086 (2015). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [5] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease. Science 371, eabd0724 (2021). source
  • Findingown data

    Geneformer cell embeddings clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype as opposed to individual patient.

    “Using a publicly available aortic aneurysm dataset14 as a test case, we found that while the original data was impacted by inter-patient variability, Geneformer cell embeddings clustered primarily by cell type and phenotype as opposed to individual patient (Extended Data Fig. 4a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source
  • Findingcitation

    Embeddings of genes in iPSC-derived myogenic cells showed similar context awareness with in silico differentiation via MYOD.

    “Embeddings of genes in iPSC-derived myogenic cells16 showed similar context awareness with in silico differentiation via MYOD (Extended Data Fig. 2d–e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Guo, D. et al. iMyoblasts for ex vivo and in vivo investigations of human myogenesis and disease modeling. eLife 11, e70341 (2022). source
  • Findingown data

    In silico reprogramming fibroblasts by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC to the front of their rank value encodings significantly shifted the remaining genes in the transcriptome's embedding towards the iPSC state.

    “When we in silico reprogrammed fibroblasts15 by artificially adding OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and MYC to the front of their rank value encodings, the remaining genes in the transcriptome significantly shifted their embedding towards the iPSC state (Extended Data Fig. 2b–c).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Xing, Q. R. et al. Diversification of reprogramming trajectories revealed by parallel single-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility sequencing. Sci. Adv. 6, 463–474 (2020). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The self-attention mechanism has transformed deep learning by generating context-aware models that can pay attention to large input spaces and learn which elements are most important in each context, boosting predictions.

    “The advent of the self-attention mechanism1,2 has further transformed the deep learning field by generating context-aware models that are able to pay attention to large input spaces and learn which elements are most important to focus on in each context, boosting predictions in a wide realm of applications2,8.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source

      The Background (p. 2) describes self-attention as relating positions within a sequence and reports its successful use in several tasks. Section 3.2.3 (p. 5) says each encoder position can attend to all positions in the preceding layer, and the Machine Translation results (p. 8) report improved translation scores. These passages support the mechanism and some performance gains, but do not establish that it transformed deep learning or boosted predictions across a wide realm of applications. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
    • cites [8] Lin, T., Wang, Y., Liu, X. & Qiu, X. A survey of transformers. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.04554 (2021). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fine-tuned Geneformer's cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using ComBat or Harmony methods.

    “Interestingly, the fine-tuned Geneformer’s cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using the ComBat17 or Harmony18 methods (Extended Data Fig. 4b–f).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa078 (2020). source
    • cites [18] Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Transfer learning has revolutionized natural language understanding and computer vision by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards downstream tasks with limited task-specific data.

    “Recently, transfer learning has revolutionized fields such as natural language understanding1,2 and computer vision3 by leveraging deep learning models pretrained on large-scale general datasets that can then be fine-tuned towards a vast array of downstream tasks with limited task-specific data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
    • cites [3] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 770–778 (IEEE, 2016). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pretrained Geneformer's gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform, preservation method, and individual patient variability.

    “We found that the gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform11, preservation method12,13, and individual patient variability14 (Extended Data Fig. 2a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Selewa, A. et al. Systematic comparison of high-throughput single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptomes during cardiomyocyte differentiation. Sci. Rep. 10, 1535 (2020). source

      The Methods and Results compare Drop-seq and DroNc-seq transcriptomes, but no passage assesses Geneformer gene embeddings or their robustness to sequencing platform. The Results instead report substantial differences in gene detection between the two techniques; that does not establish whether the citing authors’ embeddings were robust. Citation 11 is attached only to the sequencing-platform part of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] 10x Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13] 10X Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Pretraining with a masked learning objective improves generalizability of foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.

    “Pretraining was accomplished using a masked learning objective, which has been shown in other informational fields1,2 to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source

      The Background (p. 2) discusses self-attention across several tasks, and §6.3 (p. 10) reports Transformer results on constituency parsing. Neither passage addresses whether a masked pretraining objective improves generalizability for downstream fine-tuning; searches for masked learning and pretraining found no passage that does. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The model identified 478 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards dilated cardiomyopathy, which were enriched for pathways involved in muscle contraction and mitochondrial function.

    “The model identified 478 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards dilated cardiomyopathy, which were enriched for pathways involved in muscle contraction38 and mitochondrial39 function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [38] Kamisago, M. et al. Mutations in sarcomere protein genes as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. New Engl. J. Med. 343, 1688–1696 (2000). source
    • cites [39] Ramaccini, D. et al. Mitochondrial function and dysfunction in dilated cardiomyopathy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.624216 (2021). source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict central versus peripheral factors within the N1-dependent gene network using only single cell transcriptional data from ~30,000 normal endothelial cells without any perturbation data (AUC 0.81).

    “Again, Geneformer significantly boosted the ability to predict central versus peripheral factors compared to alternative methods (AUC 0.81) (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 8e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 455–472 (2020). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The model identified 447 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy state, which were enriched for pathways including Titin binding and sarcomere organization known to impact hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis.

    “Overall, the model identified 447 genes whose loss was predicted to shift cardiomyocytes towards the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy state, which were enriched for pathways including Titin binding36 and sarcomere organization37 known to impact hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] Hinson, J. T. et al. Titin mutations in iPS cells define sarcomere insufficiency as a cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Science 349, 982–986 (2015). source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [37] Seidman, C. E. & Seidman, J. G. Identifying sarcomere gene mutations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a personal history. Circ. Res. 108, 743–750 (2011). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Top enriched pathways for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pointed to candidate cardiomyocyte-specific therapeutic targets including ADCY5 and druggable targets including SRPK3.

    “Top enriched pathways for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy pointed to candidate cardiomyocyte-specific therapeutic targets including ADCY5, disruption of which is associated with longevity and protection against cardiomyopathy in mouse models40, as well as druggable targets41 including SRPK3, a downstream effector of MEF242 which is known to play a critical role in myocardial cell hypertrophy43.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [40] Ho, D., Yan, L., Iwatsubo, K., Vatner, D. E. & Vatner, S. F. Modulation of β-adrenergic receptor signaling in heart failure and longevity: targeting adenylyl cyclase type 5. Heart Fail. Rev. 15, 495–512 (2010). source
    • cites [41] Wagner, A. H. et al. DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug-gene interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1036–D1044 (2016). source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes DGIdb as a resource for checking whether candidate genes belong to potentially druggable categories, supporting the citation’s use for identifying druggable targets. Our copy does not identify SRPK3 as druggable or link it to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, so it does not support that specific example. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [42] Nakagawa, O. et al. Centronuclear myopathy in mice lacking a novel muscle-specific protein kinase transcriptionally regulated by MEF2. Genes Dev. 19, 2066–2077 (2005). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The authors previously mapped the NOTCH1-dependent gene network governing cardiac valve disease and identified central regulatory nodes whose correction had broad restorative impact on the network at large.

    “We previously mapped the NOTCH1 (N1)-dependent gene network governing cardiac valve disease and identified central regulatory nodes whose correction had broad restorative impact on the network at large4,5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [4] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell 160, 1072–1086 (2015). source
    • cites [5] Theodoris, C. V. et al. Network-based screen in iPSC-derived cells reveals therapeutic candidate for heart valve disease. Science 371, eabd0724 (2021). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TEAD4 is a transcription factor involved in the Hippo signaling pathway.

    “TEAD4 is a transcription factor involved in the Hippo signaling pathway27, and future work is warranted to further examine its role in cardiac development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Currey, L., Thor, S. & Piper, M. TEAD family transcription factors in development and disease. Development 148, dev196675 (2021). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer on the Heart Atlas ECs was able to distinguish N1 downstream targets from non-targets without any perturbation data, significantly boosting predictions compared to alternative methods.

    “Additionally, fine-tuning the pretrained Geneformer on the Heart Atlas ECs32 was able to distinguish N1 downstream targets from non-targets without any perturbation data, further demonstrating the model’s ability to encode key features of gene network dynamics and again significantly boosting predictions compared to alternative methods (Fig. 4b, Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] Litviňuková, M. et al. Cells of the adult human heart. Nature 588, 455–472 (2020). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among the top 25 deleted genes with the most significant effect were transcription factors known to regulate myocardial development (e.g. FOXM1) and entirely novel dosage-sensitive gene candidates such as TEAD4.

    “Among the top 25 deleted genes with the most significant effect were transcription factors known to regulate myocardial development (e.g. FOXM125,26) and entirely novel dosage-sensitive gene candidates such as TEAD4 (Supplementary Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [25] Bolte, C. et al. Expression of Foxm1 transcription factor in cardiomyocytes is required for myocardial development. PLoS ONE 6, e22217 (2011). source
    • cites [26] Bolte, C. et al. Postnatal ablation of Foxm1 from cardiomyocytes causes late onset cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis without exacerbating pressure overload-induced cardiac remodeling. PLoS ONE 7, e48713 (2012). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Geneformer fine-tuned with only Drop-seq data automatically integrated DroNc-seq data such that the fine-tuned Geneformer cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using ComBat or Harmony.

    “Geneformer fine-tuned with only Drop-seq data automatically integrated DroNc-seq data such that the fine-tuned Geneformer cell embeddings primarily clustered by cell types and showed improved integration of platforms compared to the original data even after batch effect removal using the ComBat17 or Harmony18 methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Zhang, Y., Parmigiani, G. & Johnson, W. E. ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa078 (2020). source
    • cites [18] Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019). source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Masked learning objective has been shown in other informational fields to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.

    “Pretraining was accomplished using a masked learning objective, which has been shown in other informational fields1,2 to improve generalizability of the foundational knowledge learned during pretraining for a wide range of downstream fine-tuning objectives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 (2017). source

      Section 3.2.3 (p. 5) describes masking decoder attention to preserve autoregressive prediction, not a masked pretraining objective. The Abstract (p. 1) and Section 6.3 (pp. 9–10) discuss applying the Transformer to translation and parsing, but do not show that masked pretraining improves generalizability across downstream fine-tuning objectives. Searched for masked learning, pretraining, and fine-tuning. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [2] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K. & Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proc. 2019 Conference North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies Vol. 1 (eds Burstein, J. et al.) 4174–4186 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Large-scale pretraining allows training of deeper models that ultimately have greater predictive potential in fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving.

    “consistent with observations that large-scale pretraining allows training of deeper models that ultimately have greater predictive potential in fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving44.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Henighan, T. et al. Scaling laws for autoregressive generative modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.14701 (2020). source

      Section 3.4 (p. 15) reports that larger pretrained image models achieve better classification performance than models trained from scratch. Section 2.1 (p. 6) says image and math tasks favor deeper models than language, and Appendix D (p. 31) reports improved language question-answering with model size. The paper does not establish that large-scale pretraining enables training deeper models across all three fields; it distinguishes model size, depth, and the benefit of pretraining. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Effect on cardiomyocyte embeddings from in silico deletion of genes linked by TWAS-prioritized GWAS to cardiac MRI traits relevant to cardiac pathology was significantly different compared to in silico deletion of control cardiac disease genes expressed in cardiomyocytes but whose pathology occurs in non-cardiomyocyte cell types (hyperlipidemia).

    “Effect on cardiomyocyte embeddings from in silico deletion of genes linked by prior transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS)-prioritized GWAS24 to cardiac MRI traits relevant to cardiac pathology (left ventricular (LV) end diastolic volume (EDV), LV end systolic volume (LVESV), LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and stroke volume (SV)) compared to in silico deletion of control cardiac disease genes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Pirruccello, J. P. et al. Analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 36,000 individuals yields genetic insights into dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Commun. 11, 2254 (2020). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Geneformer gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platform, preservation method, and individual patient variability.

    “We found that the gene embeddings were robust to sequencing platformM11, preservation method13,12, and individual patient variability14.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked
    • cites M11

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [13] 10X Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12] 10x Genomics Datasets https://www.10xgenomics.com/resources/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14] Li, Y. et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic cell populations and differential gene expression patterns in control and aneurysmal human aortic tissue. Circulation 142, 1374–1388 (2020). source

      Citation 14 is attached to individual patient variability. The Discussion describes samples from different patients and says two control sets had similar gene-expression patterns, but it does not assess Geneformer embeddings or their robustness to patient variability. Searches for gene embeddings and patient variability found no passage addressing that claim; the other two conditions are attached to different citations. (LLM, conf=0.77)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Depth was chosen based on the maximum depth for which there was sufficient data to pretrain as it has been established that this approach yields the greatest predictive potential in other informational fields.

    “Depth was chosen based on the maximum depth for which there was sufficient data to pretrain as it has been established that this approach yields the greatest predictive potential in other informational fields including NLU, computer vision, and mathematical problem-solving44.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Henighan, T. et al. Scaling laws for autoregressive generative modeling. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.14701 (2020). source

      Section 2.2 (p. 9) reports performance-maximizing depth-to-width ratios for image and math models and says these domains favor deeper models than language models. It does not establish that choosing the maximum depth permitted by available pretraining data yields the greatest predictive potential across the named fields. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Moderate confidence genes were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at an even lower rate in random cells from any tissue.

    “They were predicted to be dosage-sensitive at an even lower rate in random cells from any tissue, highlighting Geneformer’s context awareness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Applied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy using a limited number of patient samples, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental targeting in an iPSC disease model led to significant functional improvement.

    “Applied to disease modeling of cardiomyopathy using a limited number of patient samples, Geneformer predicted candidate therapeutic targets whose experimental targeting in an iPSC disease model led to significant functional improvement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In silico deletion of both GATA4 and TBX5 in combination had an even greater impact on their known co-bound targets than the sum of their individual in silico deletion, suggesting Geneformer recognized their cooperative action at these co-bound targets.

    “Furthermore, in silico deletion of both GATA4 and TBX5 in combination had an even greater impact on their known co-bound targets than the sum of their individual in silico deletion, suggesting Geneformer recognized their cooperative action at these co-bound targets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The vocabulary included 25,424 protein-coding or miRNA genes detected in a median of 173,152 cells within Genecorpus-30M.

    “The rank value encodings for each single cell transcriptome were then tokenized based on a total vocabulary of 25,424 protein-coding or miRNA genes detected in a median of 173,152 cells within Genecorpus-30M.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    15% masking had marginally lower evaluation loss compared to 5% or 30% masking.

    “15% masking had marginally lower evaluation loss compared to 5% or 30% masking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Evaluation loss was essentially equivalent across 3 trials with different random seeds, indicating robustness to the set of genes randomly masked for each cell during pretraining.

    “Evaluation loss was essentially equivalent in the 3 trials, indicating robustness to the set of genes randomly masked for each cell during the pretraining.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Transcription factors are normalized by a statistically significantly lower factor compared to all genes, resulting in higher prioritization in the rank value encoding.

    “Transcription factors are normalized by a statistically significantly lower factor (resulting in higher prioritization in the rank value encoding) compared to all genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    561 datasets were included in Genecorpus-30M.

    “Overall, 561 datasets were included and stored as uniform files in the .loom HDF5 format”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Dynamic length-grouped padding achieved a 29.4x speedup in pretraining.

    “The trainer from the Huggingface Transformers library159 was used for pretraining with the substitution of a custom tokenizer to implement dynamic, length-grouped padding, which minimized computation on padding and achieved a 29.4x speedup in pretraining.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The input size of 2048 fully represents 93% of rank value encodings in Genecorpus-30M.

    “input size of 2048 (fully represents 93% of rank value encodings in Genecorpus-30M)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors excluded cells with high mutational burdens and established metrics for scalable filtering to exclude possible doublets and/or damaged cells.

    “We excluded cells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) that could lead to substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation, and we established metrics for scalable filtering to exclude possible doublets and/or damaged cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A major strength of the self-supervised masked learning approach is that it can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, allowing inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.

    “A major strength of this approach is that it is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, which allows the inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The rank value encoding provides a nonparametric representation of each cell's transcriptome and takes advantage of many observations of each gene's expression across Genecorpus-30M to prioritize genes that distinguish cell state.

    “Although the rank-based representation has limitations including not fully taking advantage of the precise gene expression measurements provided in transcript counts, the rank value encoding provides a nonparametric representation of each cell’s transcriptome and takes advantage of the many observations of each gene’s expression across Genecorpus-30M to prioritize genes that distinguish cell state”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.

    “Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent; and attention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Geneformer's ability to predict dosage-sensitive disease genes through the context-aware in silico deletion approach represents a valuable asset for interpretation of genetic variants, including prioritization of GWAS hits driving complex traits, and the specific tissues they are expected to affect.

    “Geneformer’s ability to predict dosage-sensitive disease genes through the context-aware in silico deletion approach represents a valuable asset for interpretation of genetic variants, including prioritization of GWAS hits driving complex traits, and the specific tissues they are expected to affect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells, maintaining their promoters poised for activation.

    “Bivalent chromatin structure is known to mark key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), maintaining their promoters poised for activation28.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–356 (2006). source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Geneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the model's attention weights in a completely self-supervised manner.

    “Through the observation of a vast number of cell states during the pretraining process, Geneformer gained a fundamental understanding of network dynamics, encoding network hierarchy in the model’s attention weights in a completely self-supervised manner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Cells with less than seven detected Ensembl-annotated protein-coding or miRNA genes were excluded because the 15% masking used for the pretraining learning objective would not reliably mask a gene in cells with fewer detected genes.

    “Cells with less than seven detected Ensembl-annotated protein-coding or miRNA genes were excluded as the 15% masking used for the pretraining learning objective would not reliably mask a gene in cells with fewer detected genes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Whether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to downstream classification predictions because fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives completely separate from the masked learning objective.

    “Of note, because the fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives that are completely separate from the masked learning objective, whether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to the classification predictions, as demonstrated in Extended Data Fig. 1f.”
    • Also stated in: § Extended Data · plain
      “Because the fine-tuning applications are trained on classification objectives that are completely separate from the masked learning objective, whether or not task-specific data was included in the pretraining corpus is not relevant to the downstream classification predictions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Geneformer is a pretrained deep learning model whose fundamental understanding of network dynamics can be democratized to a broad range of downstream applications to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets in settings with limited data.

    “Overall, Geneformer represents a pretrained deep learning model whose fundamental understanding of network dynamics can now be democratized to a broad range of downstream applications to accelerate discovery of key network regulators and candidate therapeutic targets in settings with limited data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Cells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) were excluded to avoid substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation.

    “We excluded cells with high mutational burdens (e.g. malignant cells and immortalized cell lines) that could lead to substantial network rewiring without companion genome sequencing to facilitate interpretation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Hyperparameter tuning for deep learning applications generally significantly enhances learning and so it is likely that the maximum predictive potential of Geneformer in these downstream applications is significantly underestimated.

    “It should be noted that hyperparameter tuning for deep learning applications generally significantly enhances learning and so it is likely that the maximum predictive potential of Geneformer in these downstream applications is significantly underestimated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Applications that are more relevant to the pretraining objective benefit from more layers being frozen to prevent overfitting to the limited task-specific data, whereas applications that are more distant from the pretraining objective benefit from fine-tuning of more layers to optimize performance on the new task.

    “Generally, in our experience, applications that are more relevant to the pretraining objective benefit from more layers being frozen to prevent overfitting to the limited task-specific data, whereas applications that are more distant from the pretraining objective benefit from fine-tuning of more layers to optimize performance on the new task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The masked learning objective is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, allowing inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.

    “A major strength of this approach is that it is entirely self-supervised and can be accomplished on completely unlabeled data, which allows the inclusion of large amounts of training data without being restricted to samples with accompanying labels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Only droplet-based sequencing platforms were included to assure expression value unit comparability.

    “We only included droplet-based sequencing platforms to assure expression value unit comparability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The rank value encoding method provides a nonparametric representation of each single cell's transcriptome, ranking genes by their expression within that cell normalized by their expression across the entire Genecorpus-30M.

    “We developed a novel rank value encoding method that provides a nonparametric representation of each single cell’s transcriptome, ranking genes by their expression within that cell normalized by their expression across the entire Genecorpus-30M”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Fine-tuning results for gene classification applications were reported as AUCs +/- standard deviation and F1 score calculated based on a 5-fold cross-validation strategy where training was performed on 80% of the gene training labels and performance was tested on the 20% held-out gene training labels, repeating for 5 folds.

    “Fine-tuning results for gene classification applications were reported as AUCs +/− standard deviation and F1 score calculated based on a 5-fold cross-validation strategy where training was performed on 80% of the gene training labels and performance was tested on the 20% held-out gene training labels, repeating for 5 folds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All fine-tuning in Supplementary Table 2 was performed with a single training epoch to avoid overfitting.

    “All fine-tuning in Supplementary Table 2 was performed with a single training epoch to avoid overfitting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues.

    “Mapping gene networks requires large amounts of transcriptomic data to learn the connections between genes, which impedes discoveries in settings with limited data, including rare diseases and diseases affecting clinically inaccessible tissues.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Network dynamics may vary across cell types, developmental timepoints, or disease states.

    “Importantly, network dynamics may vary across cell types, developmental timepoints, or disease states.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent.

    “Gene regulatory network architectures are highly context-dependent; and attention-based models, known as transformers, may be exceptionally suited to context-specific modeling of network dynamics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mapping the network hierarchy requires large amounts of transcriptional perturbation data from patient-specific cells with isogenic controls to learn the connections between genes.

    “Mapping the network hierarchy required large amounts of transcriptional perturbation data from patient-specific cells with isogenic controls to learn the connections between genes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Single cell technologies provide more precise data for inference of network interactions.

    “Furthermore, single cell technologies have facilitated the observation of transcriptomic states without averaging genes’ expression across multiple cells, potentially providing more precise data for inference of network interactions, especially in diseases driven by dysregulation of multiple cell types.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.

    “assuming that a representative range of transcript values would be observed within the cells in which each gene was detected.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GeneFormer focuses on inference of gene function and regulatory networks, which has advantages in exploring the role of specific gene sets and gene clusters in cells and paves the foundation for omics-guided personalized therapy, but its generalization capability needs to be improved.

    “GeneFormer [189] focuses on the inference of gene function and regulatory networks, which has certain advantages in exploring the role of specific gene sets and gene clusters in cells and paves the foundation for omics-guided personalized therapy, but its generalization capability needs to be improved.”

    From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [189]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Foundation cell models are pre-trained on vast amounts (>10M examples) of unlabelled scRNA-seq data, with the aim that such large datasets allow the models to capture general principles of gene regulation and signalling.

    “These models are pre-trained on vast amounts (> 10 M examples) of unlabelled scRNA-seq data, with the aim that such large datasets allow the models to capture general principles of gene regulation and signalling.”

    From Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Geneformer architecture and pretraining section reports a corpus of 29.9 million single-cell transcriptomes, and Methods says pretraining can use completely unlabelled data. The paper describes the goal as learning network dynamics, but it establishes the >10-million-example figure for Geneformer, not for foundation cell models generally; it does not specifically identify signalling as a principle learned. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Geneformer model outputs gene embeddings, which are subsequently decoded into gene predictions.

    “The model outputs gene embeddings, which are subsequently decoded into gene predictions.”

    From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Methods sections on gene embeddings and pretraining (page not provided) say Geneformer produces contextual gene embeddings and is trained to predict genes at masked positions. They do not describe the embeddings being subsequently decoded into gene predictions, so that specific sequence is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Geneformer and scGPT offer pretrained weights and have been trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).

    “We chose these models because they offer pretrained weights and have been trained using unsupervised objectives on extensive datasets (ca. 30M single-cell transcriptomes).”

    From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Geneformer architecture and pretraining section reports a corpus of 29.9 million single-cell transcriptomes, and Methods describes a self-supervised masked-learning objective. Methods also describes using pretrained Geneformer weights for fine-tuning. These passages support the claim for Geneformer, but do not establish the same claims about scGPT or that Geneformer’s weights are publicly offered; page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Geneformer can output a sequence of up to 2048 genes and, when input is passed in batches, the model outputs the sequence of the length equal to that of the longest input.

    “Geneformer can output a sequence of up to 2048 genes and, when input is passed in batches, the model outputs the sequence of the length equal to that of the longest input.”

    From Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Methods section on Geneformer architecture specifies an input size of 2048, and its pretraining section says minibatches are dynamically padded by length. The gene-embeddings section describes an embedding for each input gene. These passages support the size limit and batch-padding behavior, but they do not say that Geneformer outputs a sequence of genes whose length equals the longest input in a batch. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theodoris, C. V., Xiao, L., Chopra, A., Chaffin, M. D., Al Sayed, Z. R., Hill, M. C., Mantineo, H., Brydon, E. M., Zeng, Z., Liu, X. S., & Ellinor, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Theodoris, Christina V.
  • Ellinor, Patrick T.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-05-31
Volume
618
Issue
7965
Pages
616-624
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4378838672
Cited by
1,193
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 488 · 2025: 402 · 2024: 257 · 2023: 46
FWCI
105.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (1R01HL092577, 18SFRN34110082, 965286, MAESTRIA 965286, 20CDA35260081)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • Bayer
  • MyoKardia
  • European Commission (965286)
  • National Institutes of Health (965,286, 18SFRN34110082)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL092577, R01HL157635, R01HL139731)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
transfer learning, Geneformer, gene regulatory networks, single-cell transcriptomics, attention-based deep learning, self-supervised pre-training, chromatin dynamics, cardiomyopathy, therapeutic target discovery, network biology
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Single-Cell Gene Expression Analysis, Biology, Chromatin, Humans, Cardiomyopathies, Neural Networks, Computer, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review