The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shared neural coding for social hierarchy and reward value in primate amygdala
Open accessAbstract
The social brain hypothesis posits that dedicated neural systems process social information. In support of this, neurophysiological data have shown that some brain regions are specialized for representing faces. It remains unknown, however, whether distinct anatomical substrates also represent more complex social variables, such as the hierarchical rank of individuals within a social group. Here we show that the primate amygdala encodes the hierarchical rank of individuals in the same neuronal ensembles that encode the rewards associated with nonsocial stimuli. By contrast, orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices lack strong representations of hierarchical rank while still representing reward values. These results challenge the conventional view that dedicated neural systems process social information. Instead, information about hierarchical rank—which contributes to the assessment of the social value of individuals within a group—is linked in the amygdala to representations of rewards associated with nonsocial stimuli. New data reveal that the amygdala—a brain area specialized for emotion—also signals the hierarchical rank of peers in a social group. These neural signals likely mediate appropriate social and emotional behavior in many social settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Neurons that are sensitive to the rank of the individual being viewed in the social hierarchy are found not only in the macaque amygdala, but also in the closely connected OFC, and anterior cingulate cortex (Munuera et al., 2018).”
From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Munuera et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making
Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2357 · Cited by 2,184
Barto, A. (1998) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38315-5 · Cited by 2,172
The influence of social hierarchy on primate health
Sapolsky, R. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106477 · Cited by 2,113
Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1990) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804121 · Cited by 1,914
Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,683
A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells
Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B. H., & Livingstone, M. S. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1119983 · Cited by 1,131
The primate amygdala represents the positive and negative value of visual stimuli during learning
Paton, J. J., Belova, M. A., Morrison, S. E., & Salzman, C. D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04490 · Cited by 917
Ghashghaei, H. T., Hilgetag, C. C., & Barbas, H. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.046 · Cited by 845
The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain
Chang, L., & Tsao, D. Y. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.011 · Cited by 644
Know Your Place: Neural Processing of Social Hierarchy in Humans
Zink, C. F., Tong, Y., Chen, Q., Bassett, D. S., Stein, J. L., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.025 · Cited by 622
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Amaral, D., Price, J., Pitkanen, A. & Carmichael, S. Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex. in The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction (ed. Aggleton, J.) 1–66 (Wiley-Liss, New York, 1992).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Geometry of Abstraction in the Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex
Bernardi, S., Benna, M. K., Rigotti, M., Munuera, J., Fusi, S., & Salzman, C. D. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.031 · Cited by 528
“that might underlie 2 or more cognitive operations (Horikawa et al., 2013; Zabicki et al., 2017; Parkinson et al., 2014; King and Dehaene, 2014; Saez et al., 2015; Munuera et al., 2018; Isik et al., 2014, 2018).”
BackgroundThe orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression
Rolls, E. T., Cheng, W., & Feng, J. (2020) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa196 · Cited by 474
“social hierarchy are found not only in the macaque amygdala, but also in the closely connected OFC, and anterior cingulate cortex (Munuera et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFolloni, D., Verhagen, L., Mars, R. B., Fouragnan, E. F., Constans, C., Aubry, J., Rushworth, M. F. S., & Sallet, J. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.019 · Cited by 405
“Frameless stereotaxic neuronavigation was used to position the transducer over the target brain area, taking into consideration the focal depth of the sonication (Figure 1; experiment 1: amygdala, n = 4; experiment 2: ACC, n = 3; relatively deep brain regions known to be interconnected and co-active during similar cog…”
Prefrontal–amygdala circuits in social decision-making
Gangopadhyay, P., Chawla, M., Monte, O. D., & Chang, S. W. C. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00738-9 · Cited by 266
Is There a ‘Social’ Brain? Implementations and Algorithms
Lockwood, P. L., Apps, M. A. J., & Chang, S. W. C. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.011 · Cited by 218
“This shows that, although research suggests a lack of social specificity when considering the whole amygdala [11], there could still be socially specific circuit-level implementations when interacting with medial prefrontal areas.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Munuera, J., Rigotti, M., & Salzman, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Munuera, Jérôme
- Salzman, C. Daniel
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2018-02-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-423
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC6092962
- OpenAlex
- W2789621216
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 21.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Simons Foundation
- Philippe Foundation
- Fondation Fyssen
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082017)
- National Eye Institute (P30EY019007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- social hierarchy, hierarchical rank, amygdala, reward value, social brain hypothesis, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, primate social behavior, face processing
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Hierarchy, Social, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
