The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Triple dissociation of attention and decision computations across prefrontal cortex
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Naturalistic decision-making typically involves sequential deployment of attention to choice alternatives to gather information before a decision is made. Attention filters how information enters decision circuits, thus implying that attentional control may shape how decision computations unfold. We recorded neuronal activity from three subregions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) while monkeys performed an attention-guided decision-making task. From the first saccade to decision-relevant information, a triple dissociation of decision- and attention-related computations emerged in parallel across PFC subregions. During subsequent saccades, orbitofrontal cortex activity reflected the value comparison between currently and previously attended information. In contrast, the anterior cingulate cortex carried several signals reflecting belief updating in light of newly attended information, the integration of evidence to a decision bound and an emerging plan for what action to choose. Our findings show how anatomically dissociable PFC representations evolve during attention-guided information search, supporting computations critical for value-guided choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Activity in ACC has also been linked to information seeking and initiation of behavioral change14,17,22,62–66”
From Interpretable abstractions of artificial neural networks predict behavior and neural activity during human information gathering (2026) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
Nickerson, R. S. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175 · Cited by 7,267
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience
Kriegeskorte, N. (2008) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 · Cited by 3,355
Constructive Consumer Choice Processes
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209535 · Cited by 2,853
Learning the value of information in an uncertain world
Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1954 · Cited by 2,053
Self-citationPayne, J. W. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2 · Cited by 1,974
Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex
Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V., & Newsome, W. T. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12742 · Cited by 1,910
How does the brain solve visual object recognition?
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010 · Cited by 1,790
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2635 · Cited by 1,408
Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making
Rushworth, M. F. S., Noonan, M. P., Boorman, E. D., Walton, M. E., & Behrens, T. E. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.014 · Cited by 1,111
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty
Soltani, A., & Izquierdo, A. (2019) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0180-y · Cited by 286
The population doctrine in cognitive neuroscience
Ebitz, R. B., & Hayden, B. Y. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.07.011 · Cited by 286
Medial and orbital frontal cortex in decision-making and flexible behavior
Klein-Flügge, M. C., Bongioanni, A., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.05.022 · Cited by 244
The self in context: brain systems linking mental and physical health
Koban, L., Gianaros, P. J., Hedy Kober, A., & Wager, T. D. (2021) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00446-8 · Cited by 258
Integrated Intelligence from Distributed Brain Activity
Duncan, J., Assem, M., & Shashidhara, S. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.012 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunt, L. T., Malalasekera, W. M. N., de Berker, A. O., Miranda, B., Farmer, S. F., Behrens, T. E. J., & Kennerley, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Champalimaud Foundation (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Hunt, Laurence T.
- Kennerley, Steven W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2018-09-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1471-1481
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- PMC
- PMC6331040
- OpenAlex
- W2742165752
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
- James S. McDonnell Foundation (JSMF220020372)
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Wellcome Trust (104765/Z/14/Z, 208789/Z/17/Z, 096689/Z/11/Z, 098830/Z/12/Z, WT104765MA)
- Astor Foundation
- Rosetrees Trust
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, value comparison, belief updating, evidence integration, decision boundaries, action planning, naturalistic decision making, neuronal activity, saccades
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cues, Decision Making, Macaca mulatta, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Reinforcement, Psychology, Saccades, Prefrontal Cortex, Patch-Clamp Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
