Cited by 1,790Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

How does the brain solve visual object recognition?

Open access
DiCarlo, James J., Zoccolan, Davide, Rust, Nicole C.·2012·Neuron

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that 'core object recognition,' the ability to rapidly recognize objects despite substantial appearance variation, is solved in the brain via a cascade of reflexive, largely feedforward computations that culminate in a powerful neuronal representation in the inferior temporal cortex. However, the algorithm that produces this solution remains poorly understood. Here we review evidence ranging from individual neurons and neuronal populations to behavior and computational models. We propose that understanding this algorithm will require using neuronal and psychophysical data to sift through many computational models, each based on building blocks of small, canonical subnetworks with a common functional goal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010

Cites

194 of 194 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep-learning algorithms share organizational overlap with the ventral visual stream of the brain.

    “and share organizational overlap with the ventral visual stream of the brain [144-146].”

    From How Do Expectations Shape Perception? (2018) · cites this paper as [144]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kobatake E Tanaka K 1994b Neuronal selectivities to complex object-features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex Journal of Neurophysiology 71 856 867 8201425
  2. Pinto N DiCarlo J Cox D 2008c Establishing Benchmarks and Baselines for Face Recognition ECCV 2008 Faces in Real Life Workshop Marseille, France
  3. Rolls ET Tovee MJ 1995 Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex Journal of Neurophysiology 73 713 726 7760130
  4. Ullman S 1996 High Level Vision Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  5. Ullman S Dickinson 2009 Beyond Classification Object Categorization: Compuer and Human Vision Perspectives Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
DiCarlo, James J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
415-434
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162950292
Cited by
1,790
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 137 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 23
FWCI
42.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Elsevier eBooks
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY014970)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
visual object recognition, inferior temporal cortex, feedforward processing, neural representations, computational models of vision, appearance variation, single neuron responses, population coding, psychophysics
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review