Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood–brain barrier dysfunction module

Open access
Munji, Roeben Nocon, Soung, Allison Luen, Weiner, Geoffrey Aaron, Sohet, Fabien, Semple, Bridgette Deanne, Trivedi, Alpa, Gimlin, Kayleen, Kotoda, Masakazu, Korai, Masaaki, Aydin, Sidar, Batugal, Austin, Cabangcala, Anne Christelle, Schupp, Patrick Georg, Oldham, Michael Clark, Hashimoto, Tomoki, Noble-Haeusslein, Linda J., Daneman, Richard·2019·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Blood vessels in the CNS form a specialized and critical structure, the blood–brain barrier (BBB). We present a resource to understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate BBB function in health and dysfunction during disease. Using endothelial cell enrichment and RNA sequencing, we analyzed the gene expression of endothelial cells in mice, comparing brain endothelial cells with peripheral endothelial cells. We also assessed the regulation of CNS endothelial gene expression in models of stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury and seizure, each having profound BBB disruption. We found that although each is caused by a distinct trigger, they exhibit strikingly similar endothelial gene expression changes during BBB disruption, comprising a core BBB dysfunction module that shifts the CNS endothelial cells into a peripheral endothelial cell-like state. The identification of a common pathway for BBB dysfunction suggests that targeting therapeutic agents to limit it may be effective across multiple neurological disorders. Munji et al. analyzed the transcriptomes of endothelial cells from multiple organs and in neural tissue of neurological disease models. They identified a blood–brain barrier dysfunction module in seizure, multiple sclerosis, stroke and brain trauma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-019-0497-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Munji, R. N., Soung, A. L., Weiner, G. A., Sohet, F., Semple, B. D., Trivedi, A., Gimlin, K., Kotoda, M., Korai, M., Aydin, S., Batugal, A., Cabangcala, A. C., Schupp, P. G., Oldham, M. C., Hashimoto, T., Noble-Haeusslein, L. J., & Daneman, R.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2019-10-14
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1892-1902
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2979370432
Cited by
329
References
7
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood–brain barrier dysfunction module. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41593-019-0497-x
The paper
Munji, R. N., Soung, A. L., Weiner, G. A., Sohet, F., Semple, B. D., Trivedi, A., Gimlin, K., Kotoda, M., Korai, M., Aydin, S., Batugal, A., Cabangcala, A. C., Schupp, P. G., Oldham, M. C., Hashimoto, T., Noble-Haeusslein, L. J., & Daneman, R. (2019). Profiling the mouse brain endothelial transcriptome in health and disease models reveals a core blood–brain barrier dysfunction module. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0497-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.