Cited by 104Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Preconfigured dynamics in the hippocampus are guided by embryonic birthdate and rate of neurogenesis

Open access
Huszár, Roman, Zhang, Yunchang, Blockus, Heike, Buzsáki, György·2022·Nature Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The incorporation of new information into the hippocampal network is likely to be constrained by its innate architecture and internally generated activity patterns. However, the origin, organization and consequences of such patterns remain poorly understood. In the present study we show that hippocampal network dynamics are affected by sequential neurogenesis. We birthdated CA1 pyramidal neurons with in utero electroporation over 4 embryonic days, encompassing the peak of hippocampal neurogenesis, and compared their functional features in freely moving adult mice. Neurons of the same birthdate displayed distinct connectivity, coactivity across brain states and assembly dynamics. Same-birthdate neurons exhibited overlapping spatial representations, which were maintained across different environments. Overall, the wiring and functional features of CA1 pyramidal neurons reflected a combination of birthdate and the rate of neurogenesis. These observations demonstrate that sequential neurogenesis during embryonic development shapes the preconfigured forms of adult network dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-022-01138-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence for a weakly preconfigured network in the telencephalon.

    “Using analysis of neighbourhood distance between PCs across environments, we found evidence for a weakly preconfigured network in the telencephalon.”

    From A population code for spatial representation in the zebrafish telencephalon (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion reports evidence for preconfigured activity patterns in hippocampal circuits, and the Results find that correlations between certain hippocampal neurons persist across changing environments. The paper's finding is specific to the hippocampus; it does not establish a preconfigured network across the telencephalon more broadly. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Spatial tuning across the hippocampus is not entirely independent but may form correlated assemblies.

    “This may support recent work in rodents suggesting that spatial tuning across the hippocampus is not entirely independent but may form correlated assemblies30,31,40,45.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 104

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Amaral D, & Lavenex P in The Hippocampus Book (eds Andersen P et al.) Hippocampal Neuroanatomy (Oxford University Press, 2007).
  2. [2]O’keefe J & Nadel L The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford Univ. Press, 1978).
  3. [50]Rakic P in Evolutionary Developmental Biology of the Cerbral Cortex (eds Bock Gregory R. &, Cardew Gail) 30– 45 (John Wiley, 2000).
  4. [53]Paxinos G & Franklin KB Paxinos and Franklin’s The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 5th edn (Academic Press, 2019).
  5. [61]Pachitariu M, Steinmetz NA, Kadir SN, Carandini M & Harris KD Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 29, 4448– 4456 (2016).
  6. [75]Williams CK & Rasmussen CE Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning Vol. 2 (MIT Press, 2006).
  7. [76]Skaggs WE, McNaughton BL & Gothard KM in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1030– 1037 (Morgan Kauffman, 1993).

Authors
Huszár, R., Zhang, Y., Blockus, H., & Buzsáki, G.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Huszár, Roman
  • Buzsáki, György
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2022-08-22
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1201-1212
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W4292641205
Cited by
104
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (U19NS104590-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampus, CA1 pyramidal neurons, neuronal birthdate, hippocampal network dynamics, place fields, spatial representation, neuronal connectivity, in utero electroporation, embryonic development
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Neurons, Pyramidal Cells, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review