Cited by 12Ion channel regulation and functionIon Channels and ReceptorsNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Structural basis for excitatory neuropeptide signaling

Open access
Kalienkova, Valeria, Dandamudi, Mowgli, Paulino, Cristina, Lynagh, Timothy·2024·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Rapid signaling between neurons is mediated by ligand-gated ion channels, cell-surface proteins with an extracellular ligand-binding domain and a membrane-spanning ion channel domain. The degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (DEG/ENaC) superfamily is diverse in terms of its gating stimuli, with some DEG/ENaCs gated by neuropeptides, and others gated by pH, mechanical force or enzymatic activity. The mechanism by which ligands bind to and activate DEG/ENaCs is poorly understood. Here we dissected the structural basis for neuropeptide-gated activity of a neuropeptide-gated DEG/ENaC, FMRFamide-gated sodium channel 1 (FaNaC1) from the annelid worm Malacoceros fuliginosus , using cryo-electron microscopy. Structures of FaNaC1 in the ligand-free resting state and in several ligand-bound states reveal the ligand-binding site and capture the ligand-induced conformational changes of channel gating, which we verified with complementary mutagenesis experiments. Our results illuminate channel gating in DEG/ENaCs and offer a structural template for experimental dissection of channel pharmacology and ion conduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-023-01198-y

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kalienkova, V., Dandamudi, M., Paulino, C., & Lynagh, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Paulino, Cristina
  • Lynagh, Timothy
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2024-02-09
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
717-726
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W4391680694
Cited by
12
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (722.017.001, 740.018.016, 203053, 234817)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (722.017.001, 740.018.016)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (234817)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
Malacoceros fuliginosus, ligand binding sites, channel gating, ligand-induced conformational change, ionic conduction
MeSH terms
Ligands, Neuropeptides, Ion Channel Gating, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Epithelial Sodium Channels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review