Cited by 20DNA Repair MechanismsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Cryo-EM structures of the Spo11 core complex bound to DNA

Open access
Yu, You, Wang, Juncheng, Liu, Kaixian, Zheng, Zhi, Arter, Meret, Claeys Bouuaert, Corentin, Pu, Stephen, Patel, Dinshaw J. +1 more·2025·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks that initiate meiotic recombination are formed by the topoisomerase-relative enzyme Spo11, supported by conserved auxiliary factors. Because high-resolution structural data have not been available, many questions remain about the architecture of Spo11 and its partners and how they engage with DNA. We report cryo-electron microscopy structures at up to 3.3-Å resolution of DNA-bound core complexes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spo11 with Rec102, Rec104 and Ski8. In these structures, monomeric core complexes make extensive contacts with the DNA backbone and with the recessed 3′-OH and first 5′ overhanging nucleotide, establishing the molecular determinants of DNA end-binding specificity and providing insight into DNA cleavage preferences in vivo. The structures of individual subunits and their interfaces, supported by functional data in yeast, provide insight into the role of metal ions in DNA binding and uncover unexpected structural variation in homologs of the Top6BL component of the core complex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-024-01382-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, K., Zheng, Z., Arter, M., Claeys Bouuaert, C., Pu, S., Patel, D. J., & Keeney, S.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Patel, Dinshaw J.
  • Keeney, Scott
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2024-09-20
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
113-124
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W4402713468
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (P30 CA08748)
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (P30-CA08748)
  • National Institutes of Health (CA08748)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA08748, P30CA008748)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM118092)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD110120)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Spo11, meiotic recombination, DNA double-strand breaks, DNA cleavage, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review