Structure and activation mechanism of a Lamassu phage and plasmid defense system
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Lamassu is a diverse family of defense systems that protect bacteria, including seventh-pandemic strains of Vibrio cholerae, against both plasmids and phage infection. During phage infection, Lamassu targets essential cellular processes, thereby halting phage propagation by terminating the infected host. The mechanisms by which Lamassu effectors are activated when needed and otherwise suppressed are unknown. Here we present structures of a Lamassu defense system from Salmonella enterica. We show that an oligomerization domain of the nuclease effector subunit, LmuA, is sequestered by two tightly folded SMC-like LmuB protomers and LmuC. Upon activation, liberated LmuA assembles into homotetramers, in which two of four nuclease domains are brought into proximity to create an active site capable of cleaving DNA. We propose that tetramer formation is likely a one-way switch that establishes a threshold to limit potential spontaneous activation and cell death. Our findings reveal a mechanism of cellular defense, involving liberation and oligomerization of immune effectors, and shed light on how Lamassu systems balance potent immune responses with self-preservation. Li et al. show that a Lamassu defense system protects bacteria from phage infection by activating a lethal tetrameric DNA-cutting enzyme. In the absence of phages, a protein clamp holds the enzyme as an inactive monomer, preventing self-damage.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3
Abramson, J., Adler, J., Dunger, J., Evans, R., Green, T., Pritzel, A., Ronneberger, O., Willmore, L., Ballard, A. J., Bambrick, J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · Cited by 15,861 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Model building was initiated using AF2 or AF3 predictions for individual subunits or the complex 59,60 .”
Structural basis of Gabija anti-phage defence and viral immune evasion
Antine, S. P., Johnson, A. G., Mooney, S. E., Leavitt, A., Mayer, M. L., Yirmiya, E., Amitai, G., Sorek, R., & Kranzusch, P. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06855-2 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Structural basis for plasmid restriction by SMC JET nuclease
Roisné-Hamelin, F., Liu, H. W., Taschner, M., Li, Y., & Gruber, S. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.01.009 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Li, Y., Adams, D. W., Liu, H. W., Shaw, S. J., Uchikawa, E., Jaskólska, M., Stutzmann, S., Righi, L., Szczelkun, M. D., Blokesch, M., & Gruber, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gruber, Stephan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
- Published
- 2025-10-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2503-2516
- ISSN
- 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-9993
- OpenAlex
- W4415143508
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 7.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- phage defense, plasmid defense, Salmonella enterica, protein oligomerization, tetramer formation, DNA cleavage, protein structure, Vibrio cholerae, bacterial immunity
- MeSH terms
- Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriophages, Models, Molecular, Plasmids, Vibrio cholerae, Crystallography, X-Ray, Salmonella enterica, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review