Cited by 79Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Decellularization and antibody staining of mouse tissues to map native extracellular matrix structures in 3D

Mayorca-Guiliani, Alejandro E, Willacy, Oliver, Madsen, Chris D., Rafaeva, Maria, Elisabeth Heumüller, Stefanie, Bock, Felix, Sengle, Gerhard, Koch, Manuel +6 more·2019·Nature Protocols

Abstract

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a major regulator of homeostasis and disease, yet the 3D structure of the ECM remains poorly understood because of limitations in ECM visualization. We recently developed an ECM-specialized method termed in situ decellularization of tissues (ISDoT) to isolate native 3D ECM scaffolds from whole organs in which ECM structure and composition are preserved. Here, we present detailed surgical instructions to facilitate decellularization of 33 different mouse tissues and details of validated antibodies that enable the visualization of 35 mouse ECM proteins. Through mapping of these ECM proteins, the structure of the ECM can be determined and tissue structures visualized in detail. In this study, perfusion decellularization is presented for bones, skeletal muscle, tongue, salivary glands, stomach, duodenum, jejunum/ileum, large intestines, mesentery, liver, gallbladder, pancreas, trachea, bronchi, lungs, kidneys, urinary bladder, ovaries, uterine horn, cervix, adrenal gland, heart, arteries, veins, capillaries, lymph nodes, spleen, peripheral nerves, eye, outer ear, mammary glands, skin, and subcutaneous tissue. Decellularization, immunostaining, and imaging take 4-5 d.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-019-0225-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayorca-Guiliani, A. E., Willacy, O., Madsen, C. D., Rafaeva, M., Elisabeth Heumüller, S., Bock, F., Sengle, G., Koch, M., Imhof, T., Zaucke, F., Wagener, R., Sasaki, T., Erler, J. T., & Reuten, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Orthopaedic University Hospital Friedrichsheim (DE)
  • Oita University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Erler, Janine T.
  • Reuten, Raphael
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2019-11-08
Volume
14
Issue
12
Pages
3395-3425
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2983262330
Cited by
79
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10
FWCI
9.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R286-2018-621)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF12OC1015992)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
extracellular matrix, decellularization, antibody staining, perfusion decellularization, mouse tissues, tissue engineering scaffolds
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Extracellular Matrix, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Organ Specificity, Perfusion, Staining and Labeling, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Tissue Engineering, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review