Cited by 22Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Identifying high-confidence capture Hi-C interactions using CHiCANE

Open access
Holgersen, Erle M., Gillespie, Andrea, Leavy, Olivia C., Baxter, Joseph S., Zvereva, Alisa, Muirhead, Gareth, Johnson, Nichola, Sipos, Orsolya +7 more·2021·Nature Protocols

Abstract

The ability to identify regulatory interactions that mediate gene expression changes through distal elements, such as risk loci, is transforming our understanding of how genomes are spatially organized and regulated. Capture Hi-C (CHi-C) is a powerful tool to delineate such regulatory interactions. However, primary analysis and downstream interpretation of CHi-C profiles remains challenging and relies on disparate tools with ad-hoc input/output formats and specific assumptions for statistical modeling. Here we present a data processing and interaction calling toolkit (CHiCANE), specialized for the analysis and meaningful interpretation of CHi-C assays. In this protocol, we demonstrate applications of CHiCANE to region capture Hi-C (rCHi-C) and promoter capture Hi-C (pCHi-C) libraries, followed by quality assessment of interaction peaks, as well as downstream analysis specific to rCHi-C and pCHi-C to aid functional interpretation. For a typical rCHi-C/pCHi-C dataset this protocol takes up to 3 d for users with a moderate understanding of R programming and statistical concepts, although this is dependent on dataset size and compute power available. CHiCANE is freely available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/chicane .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41596-021-00498-1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many computational algorithms for Hi-C analysis explicitly correct for distance decay, identifying significant interactions based on how unusual their contact frequency is at a given distance.

    “many computational algorithms for the analysis of data from Hi-C and related techniques explicitly correct for distance decay, identifying “significant interactions” based on how unusual their contact frequency is at a given distance [277, 468–471].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holgersen, E. M., Gillespie, A., Leavy, O. C., Baxter, J. S., Zvereva, A., Muirhead, G., Johnson, N., Sipos, O., Dryden, N. H., Broome, L. R., Chen, Y., Kozin, I., Dudbridge, F., Fletcher, O., & Haider, S.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Fletcher, Olivia
  • Haider, Syed
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2021-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
2257-2285
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W3140639381
Cited by
22
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (S_3754)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council (MR/L007150/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004480/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
Capture Hi-C, chicane, promoter capture Hi-C, 3D genome organization, interaction confidence, genetic susceptibility loci, gene expression regulation, R package
MeSH terms
Epigenome, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, RNA, Messenger, Statistics as Topic, Genome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Quantitative Trait Loci, Histone Code, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review