mRNA lipid nanoparticle formulation, characterization and evaluation
Open accessAbstract
mRNA-based therapies have emerged as a cutting-edge approach for diverse therapeutic applications. However, substantial barriers exist that hinder scientists from entering this research field, including the technical complexity and multiple potential workflows available for formulating and evaluating mRNA lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Here we present an easy-to-follow and step-by-step guide for mRNA LNP formulation, characterization and in vitro and in vivo evaluation that could lower these barriers, facilitating entry for scientists in academia, industry and clinical settings into this research space. In this protocol, we detail steps for formulating representative mRNA LNPs (0.5 d) and characterizing key parameters (1-6 d) such as size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, mRNA concentration, mRNA encapsulation efficiency and stability. Then, we describe in vitro evaluations (3-6 d), such as protein expression, cell uptake and mechanism investigations (3-5 d), including endosomal escape, as well as in vivo delivery evaluation (2-3 d) encompassing intracellular and secreted protein expression levels, biodistribution and additional tolerability studies (1-2 weeks). Unlike some alternative protocols that may focus on discrete aspects of the workflow-such as formulation, characterization or evaluation-our protocol instead aims to integrate each of these aspects into a simplified, singular workflow applicable across multiple types of mRNA LNP formulations. In describing these procedures, we wish to disseminate one potential workflow for mRNA LNP production and evaluation, with the ultimate goal of furthering innovation, collaboration and the translational advancement of mRNA LNPs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Perez, J. L., Pérez Marc, G., Moreira, E. D., Zerbini, C., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2034577 · Cited by 14,592 · see citing works
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
Baden, L. R., El Sahly, H. M., Essink, B., Kotloff, K., Frey, S., Novak, R., Diemert, D., Spector, S. A., Rouphael, N., Creech, C. B., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2035389 · Cited by 10,119 · see citing works
mRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: structure and stability
Schoenmaker, L., Witzigmann, D., Kulkarni, J. A., Verbeke, R., Kersten, G., Jiskoot, W., & Crommelin, D. J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120586 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
McKay, P. F., Hu, K., Blakney, A. K., Samnuan, K., Brown, J. C., Penn, R., Zhou, J., Bouton, C. R., Rogers, P., Polra, K., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17409-9 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery of siRNA to Silence Neuronal Gene Expression in the Brain
Rungta, R. L., Choi, H. B., Lin, P. J., Ko, R. W., Ashby, D., Nair, J., Manoharan, M., Cullis, P. R., & MacVicar, B. A. (2013) · Molecular Therapy—Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2013.65 · Cited by 165 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are also other techniques to quantify the in vitro protein expression, such as western blotting 67,68 , mass spectrometry 69 and ELISA 70,71 .”
An mRNA Vaccine Protects Mice against Multiple Tick-Transmitted Flavivirus Infections
VanBlargan, L. A., Himansu, S., Foreman, B. M., Ebel, G. D., Pierson, T. C., & Diamond, M. S. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.082 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Ma, Y., VanKeulen-Miller, R., & Fenton, O. S.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fenton, Owen S.
- Venue
- Nature Protocols
- Published
- 2025-03-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2618-2651
- ISSN
- 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-2189
- PMC
- PMC12312782
- OpenAlex
- W4408326708
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 18
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1R21EB034942-01)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (1K12TR004416-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- mRNA lipid nanoparticles, mRNA delivery, encapsulation efficiency, particle characterization, endosomal escape, cellular uptake, tissue distribution, in vivo delivery, protein expression, tolerability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Lipids, Liposomes, RNA, Messenger, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review