Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Criminal Justice Administrative Records System: A next-generation research data platform

Finlay, Keith, Mueller-Smith, Michael, Papp, Jordan·2022·Scientific Data
DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01620-yPMC PMC9468342
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The Criminal Justice Administrative Records System (CJARS), a joint project of the U.S. Census Bureau and the University of Michigan, is a nationally integrated data infrastructure project designed to transform research and policymaking on the United States criminal justice system. At the University of Michigan, CJARS collects longitudinal electronic records from criminal justice agencies and harmonizes these records to track a criminal episode across all stages of the system. At the U.S. Census Bureau, harmonized criminal justice records can be linked anonymously at the person-level with extensive social, demographic, and economic information from national survey and administrative records.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41597-022-01620-y

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 CJARS relational linkage structure of roster and procedural data files.
Fig. 1 CJARS relational linkage structure of roster and procedural data files.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Standardized CJARS and SCPS-derived caseload statistics for felony defendants in large urban counties, by jurisdiction-year.
Fig. 2 Standardized CJARS and SCPS-derived caseload statistics for felony defendants in large urban counties, by jurisdiction-year.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Comparison of CJARS, NPS, and NCRP-based estimates of annual incarceration entries, by state.
Fig. 3 Comparison of CJARS, NPS, and NCRP-based estimates of annual incarceration entries, by state.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Comparison of CJARS and Annual Probation Survey-based estimates of annual probation entries, by state.
Fig. 4 Comparison of CJARS and Annual Probation Survey-based estimates of annual probation entries, by state.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Comparison of CJARS and Annual Parole Survey-based estimates of annual parole entries, by state.
Fig. 5 Comparison of CJARS and Annual Parole Survey-based estimates of annual parole entries, by state.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Representativeness of CJARS data coverage for UCR-measured crime rates and BJS-measured imprisonment rate.
Fig. 6 Representativeness of CJARS data coverage for UCR-measured crime rates and BJS-measured imprisonment rate.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 CJARS stakeholders, data exchange, record harmonization, and product development.
Fig. 7 CJARS stakeholders, data exchange, record harmonization, and product development.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 8 CJARS data processing steps.
Fig. 8 CJARS data processing steps.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jacobs, J. & Crepet, T. The Expanding Scope, Use, and Availability of Criminal Records. NYU J. Legislation Public Policy 11, 177 (2007).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Finlay, K., Mueller-Smith, M., & Papp, J.
Venue
Scientific Data
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-09-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2052-4463
DOI
10.1038/s41597-022-01620-y
PMC
PMC9468342
Cited by
13
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • US Census Bureau
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Laura and John Arnold Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.