The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-photon interference of polarization-entangled photons in a Franson interferometer
Abstract
We present two-photon interference experiments with polarization-entangled photon pairs in a polarization-based Franson-type interferometer. Although the two photons do not meet at a common beamsplitter, a phase-insensitive Hong-Ou-Mandel type two-photon interference peak and dip fringes are observed, resulting from the two-photon interference effect between two indistinguishable two-photon probability amplitudes leading to a coincidence detection. A spatial quantum beating fringe is also measured for nondegenerate photon pairs in the same interferometer, although the two-photon states have no frequency entanglement. When unentangled polarization-correlated photons are used as an input state, the polarization entanglement is successfully recovered through the interferometer via delayed compensation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most schemes for high photon number N00N states are in the spirit of two-photon or multi-photon interference set by the HOM effect.
“Several schemes have thus been proposed to achieve high photon number N00N states experimentally [38][39][40][41] along with experimental demonstrations [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], where most of these schemes are in the spirit of the two-photon, or more generally multi-photon, interference set by the HOM effect.”
From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference
Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y., & Mandel, L. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2044 · Cited by 4,369
Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry
Pan, J.-W., Chen, Z.-B., Lu, C.-Y., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., & Żukowski, M. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.777 · Cited by 1,410
Theory of two-photon entanglement in type-II optical parametric down-conversion
Rubin, M. H., Klyshko, D. N., Shih, Y. H., & Sergienko, A. V. (1994) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.50.5122 · Cited by 478
Can Two-Photon Interference be Considered the Interference of Two Photons?
Pittman, T. B., Strekalov, D. V., Migdall, A., Rubin, M. H., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. H. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.1917 · Cited by 228
Atomic Hong–Ou–Mandel experiment
Lopes, R., Imanaliev, A., Aspect, A., Cheneau, M., Boiron, D., & Westbrook, C. I. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14331 · Cited by 195
Postselection-free energy-time entanglement
Strekalov, D. V., Pittman, T. B., Sergienko, A. V., Shih, Y. H., & Kwiat, P. G. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.r1 · Cited by 119
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Yuan, Z. S. et al. Entangled photons and quantum communication. Phys. Rep. 497, 1–40 (2010). · DOI
- Pan, J. W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: entangling photons that never interacted. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3891–3894 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
- Lettow, R. et al. Quantum interference of tunably indistinguishable photons from remote organic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 123605 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Stevenson, R. M. et al. Indistinguishable entangled photons generated by a light-emitting diode. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 040503 (2012). · DOI
- He, Y. et al. Indistinguishable tunable single photons emitted by spin-flip Raman transitions in InGaAs quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 237403 (2013). · DOI
- Bocquillon, E. et al. Coherence and indistinguishability of single electrons emitted by independent sources. Science 339, 1054–1057 (2013). · DOI
- Lang, C. et al. Correlations, indistinguishability and entanglement in Hong-Ou-Mandel experiments at microwave frequencies. Nat. Physics 9, 345–348 (2013). · DOI
- Jin, H. et al. On-chip generation and manipulation of entangled photons based on reconfigurable lithium-niobate waveguide circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103601 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- Sipahigil, A. et al. Indistinguishable photons from separated silicon-vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 113602 (2014). · DOI
- Fakonas, J. S., Lee, H., Kelaita, Y. A. & Atwater, H. A. Two-plasmon quantum interference. Nat. Photonics 8, 317–320 (2014). · DOI
- Northup, T. E. & Blatt, R. Quantum information transfer using photons. Nat. Photonics 8, 356–363 (2014). · DOI
- Toyoda, K., Hiji, R., Noguchi, A. & Urabe, S. Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of two phonons in trapped ions. Nature 527, 74–77 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
- Xiong, C. et al. Active temporal multiplexing of indistinguishable heralded single photons. Nat. Commun. 7, 10853 (2016). · DOI
- Autebert, C. et al. Integrated AlGaAs source of highly indistinguishable and energy-time entangled photons. Optica 3, 143–146 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. III (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, 1965). · DOI
- Kim, H., Lee, S. M. & Moon, H. S. Generalized quantum interference of correlated photon pairs. Sci. Rep. 5, 9931 (2015). · DOI
- Kim, H., Lee, S. M. & Moon, H. S. Two-photon interference of temporally separated photons. Sci. Rep. 6, 34805 (2016). · DOI
- Franson, J. D. Bell inequality for position and time. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2205–2208 (1989). · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, S. M., Kim, H., Cha, M. & Moon, H. S. Polarization-entangled photon-pair source obtained via type-II non-collinear SPDC process with PPKTP crystal. Opt. Express 24, 2941–2953 (2016). · DOI
- Rarity, J. G. & Tapster, P. R. Fourth-order interference in parametric downconversion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 1221–1226 (1989). · DOI
- Kim, Y. H., Kulik, S. P., Chekhova, M. V., Grice, W. P. & Shih, Y. H. Experimental entanglement concentration and universal Bell-state synthesizer. Phys. Rev. A 67, 010301 (2003). · DOI
- Kwon, O., Park, K. K., Ra, Y. S., Kim, Y. S. & Kim, Y. H. Time-bin entangled photon pairs from spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by a cw multi-mode diode laser. Opt. Express 21, 25492–25500 (2013). · DOI
- Fedrizzi, A. et al. Anti-symmetrization reveals hidden entanglement. New J. Phys. 11, 103052 (2009). · DOI
- Sergienko, A. V., Shih, Y. H. & Rubin, M. H. Experimental evaluation of a two-photon wave packet in type-II parametric downconversion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12, 859–862 (1995). · DOI
- Ou, Z. Y. & Mandel, L. Observation of spatial quantum beating with separated photodetectors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 54–57 (1988). · DOI
- Kim, H., Lee, H. J., Lee, S. M. & Moon, H. S. Highly efficient source for frequency-entangled photon pairs generated in a 3rd-order periodically poled MgO-doped stoichiometric LiTaO3 crystal. Opt. Lett. 40, 3061–3064 (2015). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect
Bouchard, F., Sit, A., Zhang, Y., Fickler, R., Miatto, F. M., Yao, Y., Sciarrino, F., & Karimi, E. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/abcd7a · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H., Lee, S. M., Kwon, O., & Moon, H. S.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-07-18
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2045-2322
- PMC
- PMC5516045
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review