CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of FerritesMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Localized iron accumulation precedes nucleation and growth of magnetite crystals in magnetotactic bacteria

Open access
Werckmann, Jacques, Cypriano, Jefferson, Lefèvre, Christopher T., Dembelé, Kassiogé, Ersen, Ovidiu, Bazylinski, Dennis A., Lins, Ulysses, Farina, Marcos·2017·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-08994-9PMC PMC5557804
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Many magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) biomineralize magnetite crystals that nucleate and grow inside intracellular membranous vesicles that originate from invaginations of the cytoplasmic membrane. The crystals together with their surrounding membranes are referred to magnetosomes. Magnetosome magnetite crystals nucleate and grow using iron transported inside the vesicle by specific proteins. Here we address the question: can iron transported inside MTB for the production of magnetite crystals be spatially mapped using electron microscopy? Cultured and uncultured MTB from brackish and freshwater lagoons were studied using analytical transmission electron microscopy in an attempt to answer this question. Scanning transmission electron microscopy was used at sub-nanometric resolution to determine the distribution of elements by implementing high sensitivity energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) mapping and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). EDS mapping showed that magnetosomes are enmeshed in a magnetosomal matrix in which iron accumulates close to the magnetosome forming a continuous layer visually appearing as a corona. EELS, obtained at high spatial resolution, confirmed that iron was present close to and inside the lipid bilayer magnetosome membrane. This study provides important clues to magnetite formation in MTB through the discovery of a mechanism where iron ions accumulate prior to magnetite biomineralization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-08994-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of purified Fe3O4 magnetosomes from Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) Linear chains of elongated cuboctahedral magnetosomes surrounded by what appears to be a continuous organic layer. (B–D) High magnification views of regions in A, showing the organic layer (the magnetosome membrane) of various thicknesses.
Figure 1 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of purified Fe3O4 magnetosomes from Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) Linear chains of elongated cuboctahedral magnetosomes surrounded by what appears to be a continuous organic layer. (B–D) High magnification views of regions in A, showing the organic layer (the magnetosome membrane) of various thicknesses.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 STEM-HAADF of thin-sections of a cryo-fixed cell from cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) Low magnification image showing the cytoplasm and a Fe3O4 magnetosome. (B and D) show high magnification images of the Fe3O4 magnetosome. The selected regions in (B and D) are the masks used to extract the EDS spectra shown in (C and E), respectively. By comparing the relative intensities of Fe and Co in both spectra, we conclude that iron is more concentrated in the region near the magnetosome (C) than in the cytoplasm (E). It can be seen that, compared to Co, the Fe signal decreases as the distance from the magnetosomes increases.
Figure 2 STEM-HAADF of thin-sections of a cryo-fixed cell from cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) Low magnification image showing the cytoplasm and a Fe3O4 magnetosome. (B and D) show high magnification images of the Fe3O4 magnetosome. The selected regions in (B and D) are the masks used to extract the EDS spectra shown in (C and E), respectively. By comparing the relative intensities of Fe and Co in both spectra, we conclude that iron is more concentrated in the region near the magnetosome (C) than in the cytoplasm (E). It can be seen that, compared to Co, the Fe signal decreases as the distance from the magnetosomes increases.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 EDS maps of cells of uncultured coccoid MTB from the Mediterranean Sea (A,B) and cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 (C,D). (A) Fe map of the uncultured coccus. (B) Corresponding C map of area in (A). (C) Fe map of the cultured M. australis strain IT-1 (D) Corresponding (C) map of area in (C). (E) High magnification superposition elemental map of Fe (red) and C (green) of M. australis strain IT-1. The green region that surrounds the magnetosome in (E) corresponds to the magnetosomal matrix. White arrows in (B and D) highlight the contour of the hole in the formvar lacey, and asterisk the position of one granule. (Jeol ARM microscope, Beam intensity 1 nA).
Figure 3 EDS maps of cells of uncultured coccoid MTB from the Mediterranean Sea (A,B) and cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 (C,D). (A) Fe map of the uncultured coccus. (B) Corresponding C map of area in (A). (C) Fe map of the cultured M. australis strain IT-1 (D) Corresponding (C) map of area in (C). (E) High magnification superposition elemental map of Fe (red) and C (green) of M. australis strain IT-1. The green region that surrounds the magnetosome in (E) corresponds to the magnetosomal matrix. White arrows in (B and D) highlight the contour of the hole in the formvar lacey, and asterisk the position of one granule. (Jeol ARM microscope, Beam intensity 1 nA).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 STEM images and EDS elemental maps of magnetosome chains from cells of cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) HAADF image of a Fe3O4 magnetosome chain. (B) Fe map of the chain shown in (A). (C) Edge detection algorithm image of the STEM image shown in (A). (D) Edge detection algorithm image of the Fe map shown in (C). (E) Overlay image of the processed STEM (C) and the Fe map (D). (F) High magnification of the overlay image shown in (E). Arrows indicate regions of significant Fe accumulation around the magnetosome Fe3O4 crystal.
Figure 4 STEM images and EDS elemental maps of magnetosome chains from cells of cultured Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1. (A) HAADF image of a Fe3O4 magnetosome chain. (B) Fe map of the chain shown in (A). (C) Edge detection algorithm image of the STEM image shown in (A). (D) Edge detection algorithm image of the Fe map shown in (C). (E) Overlay image of the processed STEM (C) and the Fe map (D). (F) High magnification of the overlay image shown in (E). Arrows indicate regions of significant Fe accumulation around the magnetosome Fe3O4 crystal.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 High resolution STEM imaging and EDS elemental maps of cells of cultured: Magnetovibrio blakemorei strain MV-1 cell (A–D and I,J), Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 (E–H) and from uncultured coccoid MTB from the Mediterranean Sea (L,M). (A) STEM-HAADF image showing a prismatic Fe3O4 magnetosome observed edge-on. Inset shows fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of Fe3O4 with indexation. (B) P map of the region shown in (A). Arrow denotes the magnetosome membrane evidenced by the higher intensity of P due to the presence of phospholipids. (C) Fe map of the region shown in (A). (D) High magnification Fe map of the region shown in (C) showing the presence of Fe surrounding the magnetosome (at arrow). (E–H) same as (A) to (D) but for Mf. australis strain IT-1. (I) Fe map of Fe3O4 magnetosome from Mv. blakemorei. (J) Enlarged Fe map of the intermagnetosome region of cell of Mv. blakemorei inside (I). Note the diffuse Fe distribution surrounding magnetosomes (arrowheads). (L) Fe map of Fe3O4 magnetosome from a cell of the uncultured magnetotactic coccus from the Mediterranean Sea. (M) High magnification image of a region of the Fe map inside the rectangle in (L) showing Fe surrounding the magnetosome (arrowhead). (Beam intensity FEI Titan microscope 1.3 nA figures (A–J), Jeol ARM 1 nA figures (L and M).
Figure 5 High resolution STEM imaging and EDS elemental maps of cells of cultured: Magnetovibrio blakemorei strain MV-1 cell (A–D and I,J), Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 (E–H) and from uncultured coccoid MTB from the Mediterranean Sea (L,M). (A) STEM-HAADF image showing a prismatic Fe3O4 magnetosome observed edge-on. Inset shows fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of Fe3O4 with indexation. (B) P map of the region shown in (A). Arrow denotes the magnetosome membrane evidenced by the higher intensity of P due to the presence of phospholipids. (C) Fe map of the region shown in (A). (D) High magnification Fe map of the region shown in (C) showing the presence of Fe surrounding the magnetosome (at arrow). (E–H) same as (A) to (D) but for Mf. australis strain IT-1. (I) Fe map of Fe3O4 magnetosome from Mv. blakemorei. (J) Enlarged Fe map of the intermagnetosome region of cell of Mv. blakemorei inside (I). Note the diffuse Fe distribution surrounding magnetosomes (arrowheads). (L) Fe map of Fe3O4 magnetosome from a cell of the uncultured magnetotactic coccus from the Mediterranean Sea. (M) High magnification image of a region of the Fe map inside the rectangle in (L) showing Fe surrounding the magnetosome (arrowhead). (Beam intensity FEI Titan microscope 1.3 nA figures (A–J), Jeol ARM 1 nA figures (L and M).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) of an isolated Fe3O4 magnetosome from Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 analyzed with spectral imaging at high spatial resolution (dwell time 2 s, beam intensity 0.038 nA camera length 2 cm, pixel size 0.5 nm). (A) STEM image of a magnetosome Fe3O4 crystal showing areas used for the analysis and drift correction (white rectangles). (B) Contrast stretching of the same image shown in (A) highlighting the surrounding membrane (white arrows). (C) EELS spectra obtained by the addition of spectra contained in each pixel of the same scanning line in (D); top: Spectrum corresponding to horizontally elongated rectangle (line 1) showing characteristic edges (arrows) for O (540 eV) and Fe (710 eV); bottom: Spectrum corresponding to line 2 obtained by the addition of 2 pixels along the line showing characteristic edges (arrows) for O (540 eV) and Fe (710 eV). (D) Spectrum obtained from the region shown in the square box in (A). Each pixel corresponds to one spectrum (pixel size 0.5 nm × 0.5 nm). (E) STEM-HAADF thickness map or profile map of the square region shown in (A). The intensity of each pixel is proportional of the sample thickness. (F) Projection profile of the addition of two pixels along the X axis of the HAADF intensity contained in the blue rectangle in (E). From bottom of (C, D, E and F), we assume that: (1) position 2 is outside the crystal (D,E and F), (2) in position 2 there is Fe (bottom of C) and thus Fe (other than Fe3O4) is inside the magnetosome membrane vesicle.
Figure 6 Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) of an isolated Fe3O4 magnetosome from Magnetofaba australis strain IT-1 analyzed with spectral imaging at high spatial resolution (dwell time 2 s, beam intensity 0.038 nA camera length 2 cm, pixel size 0.5 nm). (A) STEM image of a magnetosome Fe3O4 crystal showing areas used for the analysis and drift correction (white rectangles). (B) Contrast stretching of the same image shown in (A) highlighting the surrounding membrane (white arrows). (C) EELS spectra obtained by the addition of spectra contained in each pixel of the same scanning line in (D); top: Spectrum corresponding to horizontally elongated rectangle (line 1) showing characteristic edges (arrows) for O (540 eV) and Fe (710 eV); bottom: Spectrum corresponding to line 2 obtained by the addition of 2 pixels along the line showing characteristic edges (arrows) for O (540 eV) and Fe (710 eV). (D) Spectrum obtained from the region shown in the square box in (A). Each pixel corresponds to one spectrum (pixel size 0.5 nm × 0.5 nm). (E) STEM-HAADF thickness map or profile map of the square region shown in (A). The intensity of each pixel is proportional of the sample thickness. (F) Projection profile of the addition of two pixels along the X axis of the HAADF intensity contained in the blue rectangle in (E). From bottom of (C, D, E and F), we assume that: (1) position 2 is outside the crystal (D,E and F), (2) in position 2 there is Fe (bottom of C) and thus Fe (other than Fe3O4) is inside the magnetosome membrane vesicle.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 EELS of adjacent Fe3O4 magnetosomes in a cell of an uncultured freshwater coccoid MTB from a pond in Strasbourg France. (A) STEM HAADF image of two contiguous Fe3O4 magnetosomes in a chain. Spectrum image acquisition region and spatial drift (dwell time 2 s, camera length 2 cm, pixel size 0.17 nm). (B) Spectrum image obtained in the region highlighted in (A). Each acquired pixel can be assigned to an individual spectrum shown in figure (E). To enhance the signal to noise ratio, the signal from two pixels was added to give spectra in (E). (C) HAADF image or morphological map of the first line of STEM image acquired simultaneously as the spectrum image. (D) Morphological profile of the region between two magnetosomes. (F) EELS signals obtained from positions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in spectrum image show in (B). Fe signals were found in all spectra.
Figure 7 EELS of adjacent Fe3O4 magnetosomes in a cell of an uncultured freshwater coccoid MTB from a pond in Strasbourg France. (A) STEM HAADF image of two contiguous Fe3O4 magnetosomes in a chain. Spectrum image acquisition region and spatial drift (dwell time 2 s, camera length 2 cm, pixel size 0.17 nm). (B) Spectrum image obtained in the region highlighted in (A). Each acquired pixel can be assigned to an individual spectrum shown in figure (E). To enhance the signal to noise ratio, the signal from two pixels was added to give spectra in (E). (C) HAADF image or morphological map of the first line of STEM image acquired simultaneously as the spectrum image. (D) Morphological profile of the region between two magnetosomes. (F) EELS signals obtained from positions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in spectrum image show in (B). Fe signals were found in all spectra.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Cappellen, P. V. Biomineralization and global biogeochemical cycles. Rev. in Mineral. Geochem. 54, 357–381 (2003). · DOI
  2. Bazylinski, D. A. & Frankel, R. B. Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 217–230 (2004). · DOI
  3. Frankel, R. B., Bazylinski, D. A., Johnson, M. S. & Taylor, B. L. Magneto-aerotaxis in marine coccoid bacteria. Biophys. J. 73, 994–1000 (1997). · DOI
  4. Lowenstam, H. A. Minerals formed by organisms. Science 211, 1126–1131 (1981). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Pósfai, M., Lefèvre, C. T., Trubitsyn, D., Bazylinski, D. A. & Frankel, R. B. Phylogenetic significance of composition and crystal morphology of magnetosome minerals. Front. Microbiol. 4, 344, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00344 (2013). · DOI
  6. Rahn-Lee, L. et al. A genetic strategy for probing the functional diversity of magnetosome formation. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004811, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004811 (2015). · DOI
  7. Cornejo, E., Subramanian, P., Li, Z., Jensen, G. J. & Komeili, A. Dynamic remodeling of the magnetosome membrane is triggered by the initiation of biomineralization. MBio. 7, e01898–15, doi:10.1128/mBio.01898-15 (2016). · DOI
  8. Nudelman, H. et al. Structure-function studies of the magnetite-biomineralizing magnetosome-associated protein MamC. J. Struct. Biol. 194, 244–252 (2016). · DOI
  9. Yamagishi, A. et al. Control of magnetite nanocrystal morphology in magnetotactic bacteria by regulation of mms7 gene expression. Sci. Rep. 6, 29785, doi:10.1038/srep29785 (2016). · DOI
  10. Uebe, R. & Schüler, D. Magnetosome biogenesis in magnetotactic bacteria. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 14, 621–637 (2016). · DOI
  11. Grünberg, K., Wawer, C., Tebo, B. M. & Schüler, D. A large gene cluster encoding several magnetosome proteins is conserved in different species of magnetotactic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 4573–4582 (2001). · DOI
  12. Ullrich, S., Kube, M., Schübbe, S., Reinhardt, R. & Schüler, D. A hypervariable 130kilobase genomic region of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense comprises a magnetosome island which undergoes frequent rearrangements during stationary growth. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7176–7184 (2005). · DOI
  13. Faivre, D. & Godec, U. K. From bacteria to mollusks: the principles underlying the biomineralization of iron oxide materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 4728–4747 (2015). · DOI
  14. Mandernack, K. W., Bazylinski, D. A., Shanks, W. C. & Bullen, T. D. Oxygen and iron isotope studies of magnetite produced by magnetotactic bacteria. Science 285, 1892–1896 (1999). · DOI
  15. Frankel, R. B., Blakemore, R. & Wolfe, R. S. Magnetite in freshwater magnetotactic bacteria. Science 203, 1355–1356 (1979). · DOI
  16. Frankel, R. B., Papaefthymiou, G. C., Blakemore, R. P. & O’Brien, W. D. Fe3O4 precipitation in magnetotactic bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 763, 147–159 (1983). · DOI
  17. Faivre, D., Böttger, L. H., Matzanke, B. F. & Schüler, D. Intracellular magnetite biomineralization in bacteria proceeds by a distinct pathway involving membrane-bound ferritin and an iron(II) species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 8495–8499 (2007). · DOI
  18. Staniland, S., Ward, B., Harrianson, A., Van der Laan, G. & Telling, N. Rapid magnetosome formation shown by real-time x-ray magnetic circular dichroism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19524–19528 (2007). · DOI
  19. Baumgartner, J. et al. Magnetotactic bacteria form magnetite from a phosphate-rich ferric hydroxide via nanometric ferric (oxyhydr)oxide intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14883–14888 (2013). · DOI
  20. Dunin-Borkowski, R. E. et al. Magnetic microstructure of magnetotactic bacteria by electron holography. Science 282, 1868–1870 (1998). · DOI
  21. Lins, U., Mc Cartney, M. C., Farina, M., Frankel, R. B. & Buseck, P. R. Habits of magnetosome crystals in coccoid magnetotactic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4902–4905 (2005). · DOI
  22. Peyre, H., Duval, P. & Henry, L. Diffraction de Fresnel des électrons diffusés élastiquement et inélastiquement par des écrans semi-transparents. J. Phys. 41, 1353–1360 (1980). · DOI
  23. Pennycook, S. J. Z-Contrast STEM for materials science. Ultramicroscopy 30, 58–69 (1989). · DOI
  24. Nudelman, H. & Zarivach, R. Structure prediction of magnetosome-associated proteins. Front. Microbiol. 5, 9, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00009 (2014). · DOI
  25. Balkwill, D. L., Maratea, D. & Blakemore, R. P. Ultrastructure of a magnetotactic spirillum. J. Bacteriol. 141, 1399–1408 (1980). · DOI
  26. Komeili, A., Li, Z., Newman, D. K. & Jensen, G. J. Magnetosomes are cell membrane invaginations organized by the actin-like protein mamk. Science 311, 242–245 (2006). · DOI
  27. Gorby, Y. A., Beveridge, T. J. & Blakemore, R. P. Characterization of the bacterial magnetosome membrane. J. Bacteriol. 170, 834–841 (1988). · DOI
  28. Andersen, O. S. & Koeppe, R. E. Bilayer thickness and membrane protein function: an energetic perspective. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 107–130 (2007). · DOI
  29. Taoka, A. et al. Spatial localizations of Mam22 and Mam12 in the magnetosomes of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum. J. Bacteriol. 188, 3805–3812 (2006). · DOI
  30. Yamamoto, D. et al. Visualization and structural analysis of the bacterial magnetic organelle magnetosome using atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9382–9387 (2010). · DOI
  31. Taylor, A. P. & Barry, J. C. Magnetosomal matrix: ultrafine structure may template biomineralization of magnetosomes. J. Microsc. 213, 180–197 (2004). · DOI
  32. Schüler, D. & Baeuerlein, E. Dynamics of iron uptake and Fe3O4 biomineralization during aerobic and microaerobic growth of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. J. Bacteriol. 180, 159–162 (1998). · DOI
  33. Meghan, E. B. et al. Desulfovibrio magneticus RS-1 contains an iron- and phosphorus-rich organelle distinct from its bulletshaped magnetosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12263–12268 (2010). · DOI
  34. Lefèvre, C. T. et al. Morphological features of elongated-anisotropic magnetosome crystals in magnetotactic bacteria of the Nitrospirae phylum and the Deltaproteobacteria class. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 312, 194–200 (2011). · DOI
  35. Frankel, R. B. & Papaefthymiou, G. C. Biomineralization of Fe3O4 in bacteria. Chemical mossbauer spectroscopy (ed. Herber, R. H.) 113–132 (Plenum Press, New York, 1984). · DOI
  36. Abreu, F. et al. Cryo-electron tomography of the magnetotactic vibrio Magnetovibrio blakemorei: Insights into the biomineralization of prismatic magnetosomes. J. Struct. Biol. 181, 162–168 (2013). · DOI
  37. Lins, U. et al. Simple homemade apparatus for harvesting uncultured magnetotactic microorganisms. Braz. J. Microbiol. 34, 111–116 (2003). · DOI
  38. Morillo, V. et al. Isolation, cultivation and genomic analysis of magnetosome biomineralization genes of a new genus of South-seeking magnetotactic cocci within the Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 5, 72, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00072 (2014). · DOI
  39. Silva, K. T. et al. Optimization of magnetosome production and growth by the magnetotactic vibrio Magnetovibrio blakemorei strain MV-1 through a statistics-based experimental design. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 2823–2827 (2013). · DOI
  40. Fdez-Gubieda, M. et al. Magnetite Biomineralization in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense: Time-Resolved Magnetic and Structural Studies. ACS Nano. 7, 3297–3305 (2013). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Asbestos and Iron

    Ghio, A. J., Stewart, M., Sangani, R. G., Pavlisko, E. N., & Roggli, V. L. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241512390 · Cited by 15

    “This biomineralization also occurs within intracellular membranous vesicles that originate from invaginations of the cytoplasmic membrane [139].”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Werckmann, J., Cypriano, J., Lefèvre, C. T., Dembelé, K., Ersen, O., Bazylinski, D. A., Lins, U., & Farina, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Werckmann, Jacques
ORCID
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-08-15
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
8291-8291
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41598-017-08994-9
PMC
PMC5557804
OpenAlex
W2744758543
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1423939)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-TERC-0025)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
magnetotactic bacteria, magnetite biomineralization, magnetosomes, iron accumulation, crystal nucleation and growth, iron transport, electron energy loss spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray mapping
MeSH terms
Crystallization, Iron, Rhodospirillaceae, Liquid Crystals, Ferrosoferric Oxide, Magnetosomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review