Cited by 29Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

The homology and function of the lung plates in extant and fossil coelacanths

Open access
Cupello, Camila, Meunier, François J., Herbin, Marc, Janvier, Philippe, Clément, Gaël, Brito, Paulo M.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The presence of a pulmonary organ that is entirely covered by true bone tissue and fills most of the abdominal cavity is hitherto unique to fossil actinistians. Although small hard plates have been recently reported in the lung of the extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae, the homology between these hard structures in fossil and extant forms remained to be demonstrated. Here, we resolve this question by reporting the presence of a similar histological pattern–true cellular bone with star-shaped osteocytes, and a globular mineralisation with radiating arrangement–in the lung plates of two fossil coelacanths (Swenzia latimerae and Axelrodichthys araripensis) and the plates that surround the lung of the most extensively studied extant coelacanth species,L. chalumnae. The point-for-point structural similarity of the plates in extant and fossil coelacanths supports their probable homology and, consequently, that of the organ they surround. Thus, this evidence questions the previous interpretations of the fatty organ as a component of the pulmonary complex of Latimeria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-09327-6

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Homologous analyses suggest that some morphologies related to vertebrate land dispersal were already present in early bony fish species.

    “However, homologous analyses of these body forms and structures in more ancient species have suggested that some of the morphologies related to vertebrate land dispersal were already present in early bony fish species.”

    From Ancestral developmental potentials in early bony fish contributed to vertebrate water-to-land transition (2021) · cites this paper as Cupello et al., 2017

    The Abstract reports probable homology between lung plates in fossil and extant coelacanths, and the Discussion says lungs are presumed in early bony fishes (page numbers unavailable). These passages support the presence of an ancient respiratory morphology, but the paper does not link that morphology to vertebrate dispersal onto land. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Primitive lungs can be observed in several extant basal actinopterygians (bichirs, reedfish) and all extant sarcopterygians, as well as some fossils of coelacanths and salamanders.

    “In addition, primitive lungs, which originated from the respiratory pharynx and were located on the ventral side of the alimentary tracts, can be observed in several extant basal actinopterygians (bichirs, reedfish) and all extant sarcopterygians, as well as some fossils of coelacanths and salamanders (Cupello et al., 2017; Tissier et al., 2017) (Figure 1).”

    From Ancestral developmental potentials in early bony fish contributed to vertebrate water-to-land transition (2021) · cites this paper as Cupello et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) says that all extant sarcopterygians have a functional lung and describes lung evidence in fossil coelacanths. It also places the vestigial lung ventral to the alimentary tract in extant coelacanths. It does not address bichirs, reedfish, fossil salamanders, or an origin in the respiratory pharynx, so it supports only part of the cited sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cupello, C., Meunier, F. J., Herbin, M., Janvier, P., Clément, G., & Brito, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Cupello, Camila
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-08-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
9244-9244
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747170248
Cited by
29
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (142252/2011-5, 304082/2013-9)
  • Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (E-26/, E-26/111, E-26/111.818/2013)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 7207, UMR 7208, UPMC-Paris6)
  • Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (UMS2700)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae, homology, osteocytes, lung histology
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Lung

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review