The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observed drought indices show increasing divergence across Europe
Open accessAbstract
Recent severe European droughts raise the vital question: are we already experiencing measurable changes in drought likelihood that agree with climate change projections? The plethora of drought definitions compounds this question, requiring instead that we ask: how have various types of drought changed, how do these changes compare with climate projections, and what are the causes of observed differences? To our knowledge, this study is the first to reveal a regional divergence in drought likelihood as measured by the two most prominent meteorological drought indices: the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and the Standardized Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) across Europe over the period 1958–2014. This divergence is driven primarily by an increase in temperature from 1970–2014, which in turn increased reference evapotranspiration (ET 0) and thereby drought area measured by the SPEI. For both indices, Europe-wide analysis shows increasing drought frequencies in southern Europe and decreasing frequencies in northern Europe. Notably, increases in temperature and ET 0 have enhanced droughts in southern Europe while counteracting increased precipitation in northern Europe. This is consistent with projections under climate change, indicating that climate change impacts on European drought may already be observable and highlighting the potential for discrepancies among standardized drought indices in a non-stationary climate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models
Dai, A. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1633 · Cited by 4,762
Global warming and changes in drought
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., van der Schrier, G., Jones, P. D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K. R., & Sheffield, J. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2067 · Cited by 3,382
Little change in global drought over the past 60 years
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., & Roderick, M. L. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11575 · Cited by 1,978
Impact of global dimming and brightening on global warming
Wild, M., Ohmura, A., & Makowski, K. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2006gl028031 · Cited by 343
Cited by
A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming?
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Quiring, S. M., Peña-Gallardo, M., Yuan, S., & Domínguez-Castro, F. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102953 · Cited by 733
Hari, V., Rakovec, O., Markonis, Y., Hanel, M., & Kumar, R. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68872-9 · Cited by 485
Vicente‐Serrano, S. M., McVicar, T. R., Miralles, D. G., Yang, Y., & Tomas‐Burguera, M. (2020) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.632 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Stagge, J. H., Kingston, D. G., Tallaksen, L. M., & Hannah, D. M.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14045-14045
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765387680
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observed drought indices show increasing divergence across Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-017-14283-2
- The paper
- Stagge, J. H., Kingston, D. G., Tallaksen, L. M., & Hannah, D. M. (2017). Observed drought indices show increasing divergence across Europe. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14283-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.