Differential contribution of cis and trans gene transcription regulatory mechanisms in amygdala and prefrontal cortex and modulation by social stress
Open accessAbstract
While both individual transcription factors and cis-acting sites have been studied in relation to psychiatric disorders, there is little knowledge of the relative contribution of trans-acting and cis-acting factors to gene transcription in the brain. Using an RNA-seq approach in mice bred from two evolutionary-distinct mice strains, we determined the contribution of cis and trans factors to gene expression in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala, two regions of the brain relevant to the stress response, and the contribution of cis and trans factors in the prefrontal cortex after Chronic Social Defeat (CSD) in mice. More genes were regulated by cis-regulatory factors in both brain regions, underlying the importance of cis-acting gene regulation in the brain. However, there was an increase in genes regulated by trans-regulatory mechanisms in the amygdala, compared to the prefrontal cortex. These genes were involved in synaptic functions, and were enriched for binding sites for transcription factors, including Egr1. CSD induced an increase in genes regulated by trans-regulatory mechanisms in the prefrontal cortex, and induced a pattern similar to the unstressed amygdala. Overall, we show brain site-specific patterns in cis and trans regulatory mechanisms, and show that these patterns can be modified by a psychological trigger.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positive emotions can neutralize the moderating effects of the BDNF(Val66Met) genotype on social stress sensitivity.
“Studies on the genetic mechanisms underlying stress responses show that positive emotions can neutralize the moderating effects of the BDNF(Val66Met) genotype on social stress sensitivity, indicating a potential avenue for mitigating stress through emotional regulation.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [122]
Early life stress has been significantly associated with DNA methylation levels at the 5-HTTLPR site, correlating with decreased white matter integrity in individuals with panic disorder.
“In humans, early life stress has been significantly associated with DNA methylation levels at the 5-HTTLPR site, correlating with decreased white matter integrity in individuals with panic disorder.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [122]
Chronic social defeat (CSD) in mice reveals that while cis-regulatory mechanisms predominantly control gene expression in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala, trans-regulatory mechanisms become more prominent in the amygdala under stress.
“Chronic social defeat (CSD) in mice reveals that while cis-regulatory mechanisms predominantly control gene expression in these brain regions, trans-regulatory mechanisms become more prominent in the amygdala under stress.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 19
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [27]Paxinos, F. & Franklin, K. B. J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Academic Press, San Diego, California, 2001).
- Authors
- Reuveni, E., Getselter, D., Oron, O., & Elliott, E.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Elliott, Evan
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2018-04-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6339-6339
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5910421
- OpenAlex
- W2801014844
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bar-Ilan University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cis-regulatory elements, trans-regulatory elements, transcriptional regulation, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, chronic social defeat, social stress, EGR1, transcription factor binding sites, synaptic function, brain region-specific gene expression, mouse strains
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Binding Sites, Gene Expression Regulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Prefrontal Cortex, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review