Cited by 113Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

How Quantum Mechanics can consistently describe the use of itself

Open access
Lazarovici, Dustin, Hubert, Mario·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

We discuss the no-go theorem of Frauchiger and Renner based on an “extended Wigner’s friend” thought experiment which is supposed to show that any single-world interpretation of quantum mechanics leads to inconsistent predictions if it is applicable on all scales. We show that no such inconsistency occurs if one considers a complete description of the physical situation. We then discuss implications of the thought experiment that have not been clearly addressed in the original paper, including a tension between relativity and nonlocal effects predicted by quantum mechanics. Our discussion applies in particular to Bohmian mechanics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-37535-1

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abandoning free choice and locality might not resolve the contradiction.

    “While the precise interpretation of (5) within nonlocal theories is under debate (21), it seems that abandoning free choice and locality might not resolve the contradiction (5).”

    From Experimental test of local observer independence (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

    In ‘Analysis > On the Bohmian perspective’ (page unavailable), the paper says the apparent contradiction comes from an agent using the wrong quantum state, not from a failure of Bohmian mechanics. ‘Analysis > The fallacy’ concludes that Bohmian mechanics gives a consistent description of the experiment. The paper does not discuss abandoning free choice, but its conclusion is contrary to citing it for the suggestion that the contradiction may persist in a nonlocal theory. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Bell, J. S. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics second edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
  2. [10]Albert, D. Z. After Physics (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazarovici, D., & Hubert, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lazarovici, Dustin
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-01-24
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
470-470
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913808361
Cited by
113
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (174745)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
measurement problem, Bohmian mechanics, quantum foundations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review