Cited by 69Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChronic Disease Management StrategiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Somatic symptom load in men and women from middle to high age in the Gutenberg Health Study - association with psychosocial and somatic factors

Open access
Beutel, Manfred E., Wiltink, Jörg, Ghaemi Kerahrodi, Jasmin, Tibubos, Ana N., Brähler, Elmar, Schulz, Andreas, Wild, Philipp, Münzel, Thomas +5 more·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The purpose of the study was (1) to determine the prevalence of somatic symptoms in men and women in the general population and (2) to identify the contributions of psychosocial factors and somatic disease on symptom reporting. A total of 7,925 participants aged 40 to 80 years underwent medical and psychological assessments, based on the PHQ-15 (Patient Health Questionnaire). We excluded 3 items in order to avoid confounding findings: 2 items overlapping with the depression measure (PHQ-9) and the menstruation complaints item which biases sex comparisons. Pain complaints (arms, legs, joints, back pain) affected the majority of men and women, and somatic symptom reporting increased with age. When confounding has been reduced, psychosocial factors (lack of social support, adverse life events, loneliness, depression, generalized anxiety, panic, social phobia) have remained the strongest predictors of somatic symptoms. As shown by the interaction between sex and depression, depression plays a smaller role for somatic symptom reporting in women vs. men. Findings highlight the complex psychosocial and somatic contributions to somatic symptom reporting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-40709-0

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stress can undermine health by increasing the number and severity of somatic symptoms, the probability of infection and severity of symptoms following exposure to a cold virus, and systemic inflammation.

    “Stress can undermine health in many ways, for example, by increasing the number and severity of somatic symptoms,31 the probability of infection and the severity of symptoms following exposure to a cold virus,32 and systemic inflammation.33”

    From Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Löwe, B., Zipfel, S., Herzog, W. Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ D). Komplettversion und Kurzform. Testmappe mit Manual, Fragebögen, Schablonen. 2nd edition (Pfizer, 2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beutel, M. E., Wiltink, J., Ghaemi Kerahrodi, J., Tibubos, A. N., Brähler, E., Schulz, A., Wild, P., Münzel, T., Lackner, K., König, J., Pfeiffer, N., Michal, M., & Henning, M.
Affiliations
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Henning, Michaela
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-03-14
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
4610-4610
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921528048
Cited by
69
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation (AZ 961‐386261/733, 961‐386261/733)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
somatic symptoms, sex differences, psychosocial factors, social support, life events, loneliness, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, pain complaints, age differences, PHQ-15, Gutenberg Health Study
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Anxiety, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Somatoform Disorders, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review