The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination
Open accessAbstract
Along the last two centuries, the story of semiconductor materials ranged from a mix of disbelief and frustration to one of the most successful technological achievements ever seen. Such a progress comprised the development of materials and models that, allied to the knowledge provided by spectroscopic techniques, resulted in the (nowadays) omnipresent electronic gadgets. Within this context, optically-based methods were of special importance since, amongst others, they presented details about the electronic states and energy bandgap E gap of semiconductors which, ultimately, decided about their application in devices. Stimulated by these aspects, this work investigated the semiconductors silicon, germanium, and gallium-arsenide in the crystalline (bulk and powder) and amorphous (film) forms. The detailed analysis of the experimental results indicates that accurate E gap values can be obtained by fitting a sigmoid (Boltzmann) function to their corresponding optical absorption spectra. The method is straightforward and, contrary to the traditional approaches to determine E gap, it is exempt from errors due to experimental spectra acquisition and data processing. Additionally, it complies with the requirements of direct, indirect, and amorphous bandgap semiconductors, and it is able to probe the (dis)order of the material as well. In view of these characteristics, a new−unified methodology based on the fitting of the absorption spectrum with a Boltzmann function is being proposed to efficiently determine the optical bandgap of semiconductor materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal–support interactions in metal oxide-supported atomic, cluster, and nanoparticle catalysis
Leybo, D., Etim, U. J., Monai, M., Bare, S. R., Zhong, Z., & Vogt, C. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00527a · Cited by 417
The Optical Bandgap of Lithium Niobate (LiNbO3) and Its Dependence with Temperature
Zanatta, A. R. (2022) · Results in Physics · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105736 · Cited by 49
Self-citationThirumalai, A., Girigoswami, K., Prabhu, A. D., Durgadevi, P., Kiran, V., & Girigoswami, A. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16111378 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanatta, A. R.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2019-08-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11225-11225
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966305634
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-47670-y
- The paper
- Zanatta, A. R. (2019). Revisiting the optical bandgap of semiconductors and the proposal of a unified methodology to its determination. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47670-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.