Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography

Open access
Dong, Yuxi C., Hajfathalian, Maryam, Maidment, Portia S. N., Hsu, Jessica C., Naha, Pratap C., Si-Mohamed, Salim, Breuilly, Marine, Kim, Johoon, Chhour, Peter, Douek, Philippe, Litt, Harold I., Cormode, David P.·2019·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is one of the most commonly used clinical imaging modalities. There have recently been many reports of novel contrast agents for CT imaging. In particular, the development of gold nanoparticles (AuNP) as CT contrast agents is a topic of intense interest. AuNP have favorable characteristics for this application such as high payloads of contrast generating material, strong X-ray attenuation, excellent biocompatibility, tailorable surface chemistry, and tunable sizes and shapes. However, there have been conflicting reports on the role of AuNP size on their contrast generation for CT. We therefore sought to extensively investigate the AuNP size-CT contrast relationship. In order to do this, we synthesized AuNP with sizes ranging from 4 to 152 nm and capped them with 5 kDa m-PEG. The contrast generation of AuNP of different sizes was investigated with three clinical CT, a spectral photon counting CT (SPCCT) and two micro CT systems. X-ray attenuation was quantified as attenuation rate in Hounsfield units per unit concentration (HU/mM). No statistically significant difference in CT contrast generation was found among different AuNP sizes via phantom imaging with any of the systems tested. Furthermore, in vivo imaging was performed in mice to provide insight into the effect of AuNP size on animal biodistribution at CT dose levels, which has not previously been explored. Both in vivo imaging and ex vivo analysis with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) indicated that AuNP that are 15 nm or smaller have long blood circulation times, while larger AuNP accumulated in the liver and spleen more rapidly. Therefore, while we observed no AuNP size effect on CT contrast generation, there is a significant effect of size on AuNP diagnostic utility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-019-50332-8

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Metadata

Authors
Dong, Y. C., Hajfathalian, M., Maidment, P. S. N., Hsu, J. C., Naha, P. C., Si-Mohamed, S., Breuilly, M., Kim, J., Chhour, P., Douek, P., Litt, H. I., & Cormode, D. P.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2019-10-17
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
14912-14912
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981077120
Cited by
257
References
59
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-50332-8
The paper
Dong, Y. C., Hajfathalian, M., Maidment, P. S. N., Hsu, J. C., Naha, P. C., Si-Mohamed, S., Breuilly, M., Kim, J., Chhour, P., Douek, P., Litt, H. I., & Cormode, D. P. (2019). Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50332-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.