The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography
Open accessAbstract
Computed tomography (CT) is one of the most commonly used clinical imaging modalities. There have recently been many reports of novel contrast agents for CT imaging. In particular, the development of gold nanoparticles (AuNP) as CT contrast agents is a topic of intense interest. AuNP have favorable characteristics for this application such as high payloads of contrast generating material, strong X-ray attenuation, excellent biocompatibility, tailorable surface chemistry, and tunable sizes and shapes. However, there have been conflicting reports on the role of AuNP size on their contrast generation for CT. We therefore sought to extensively investigate the AuNP size-CT contrast relationship. In order to do this, we synthesized AuNP with sizes ranging from 4 to 152 nm and capped them with 5 kDa m-PEG. The contrast generation of AuNP of different sizes was investigated with three clinical CT, a spectral photon counting CT (SPCCT) and two micro CT systems. X-ray attenuation was quantified as attenuation rate in Hounsfield units per unit concentration (HU/mM). No statistically significant difference in CT contrast generation was found among different AuNP sizes via phantom imaging with any of the systems tested. Furthermore, in vivo imaging was performed in mice to provide insight into the effect of AuNP size on animal biodistribution at CT dose levels, which has not previously been explored. Both in vivo imaging and ex vivo analysis with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) indicated that AuNP that are 15 nm or smaller have long blood circulation times, while larger AuNP accumulated in the liver and spleen more rapidly. Therefore, while we observed no AuNP size effect on CT contrast generation, there is a significant effect of size on AuNP diagnostic utility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daniel, M.-C., & Astruc, D. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030698+ · Cited by 12,446
A study of the nucleation and growth processes in the synthesis of colloidal gold
Turkevich, J., Stevenson, P. C., & Hillier, J. (1951) · Discussions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/df9511100055 · Cited by 7,792
Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells
Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl052396o · Cited by 4,879
Determination of Size and Concentration of Gold Nanoparticles from UV−Vis Spectra
Haiss, W., Thanh, N. T. K., Aveyard, J., & Fernig, D. G. (2007) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0702084 · Cited by 3,677
Long-Circulating and Target-Specific Nanoparticles: Theory to Practice
Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C., & Murray, J. C. (2001) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01494-7 · Cited by 3,515
Nanoparticle PEGylation for Imaging and Therapy
Jokerst, J. V., Lobovkina, T., Zare, R. N., & Gambhir, S. S. (2011) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.11.19 · Cited by 2,046
New-Concept Chemotherapy by Nanoparticles of Biodegradable Polymers: Where Are We Now?
Feng, S.-S. (2006) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.1.3.297 · Cited by 1,951
Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis
Lee, D.-E., Koo, H., Sun, I.-C., Ryu, J. H., Kim, K., & Kwon, I. C. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs15261d · Cited by 1,410
Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances
Hsieh, J. (2015) · doi:10.1117/3.2197756 · Cited by 1,400
X-ray-Computed Tomography Contrast Agents
Lusic, H., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200358s · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
El Hallal, R., Lyu, N., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26030567 · Cited by 51
Tomitaka, A., Vashist, A., Kolishetti, N., & Nair, M. (2023) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d3na00180f · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, Y. C., Hajfathalian, M., Maidment, P. S. N., Hsu, J. C., Naha, P. C., Si-Mohamed, S., Breuilly, M., Kim, J., Chhour, P., Douek, P., Litt, H. I., & Cormode, D. P.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2019-10-17
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14912-14912
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981077120
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41598-019-50332-8
- The paper
- Dong, Y. C., Hajfathalian, M., Maidment, P. S. N., Hsu, J. C., Naha, P. C., Si-Mohamed, S., Breuilly, M., Kim, J., Chhour, P., Douek, P., Litt, H. I., & Cormode, D. P. (2019). Effect of Gold Nanoparticle Size on Their Properties as Contrast Agents for Computed Tomography. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50332-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.